Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of Failed Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery

  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (H Goldman and G Badlani, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing volume of surgery being performed for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), especially with the widespread use of midurethral slings (MUS), recurrent urinary incontinence is becoming an increasingly common condition. Various preoperative and intraoperative factors have been associated with failed SUI surgery. Treatment options for failed SUI surgery include conservative management and/or surgical management, which include pubovaginal sling, MUS, retropubic suspension, periurethral bulking agents, and artificial sphincters. The choice of treatment option will depend on the etiology of the patient’s failure, patient comorbidities, and patient preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1306–14. discussion 1314-1305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tegerstedt G, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyren O, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(6):497–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dooley Y, Kenton K, Cao G, et al. Urinary incontinence prevalence: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Urol. 2008;179(2):656–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rovner ES, Dmochowski RR, Leach GE, et al. A randomized, controlled clinical trial of a novel intravesical pressure attenuation device for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2013;190(6):2243–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapple CR. Retropubic suspension surgery for incontinence in women. In: Wein A, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, et al., editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p. 2047–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dmochowski RR, Blaivas JM, Gormley EA, et al. Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1906–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Costa P, Poinas G, Ben Naoum K, et al. Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):753–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Albo ME, Litman HJ, Richter HE, et al. Treatment success of retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings at 24 months. J Urol. 2012;188(6):2281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2143–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ward KL, Hilton P. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008;115(2):226–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merlin T, Arnold E, Petros P, et al. A systematic review of tension-free urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence: intravaginal slingplasty and the tension-free vaginal tape procedures. BJU Int. 2001;88(9):871–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4, CD006375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL. Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(9):740–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Athanasiou S, Grigoriadis T, Zacharakis D, et al. Seven years of objective and subjective outcomes of transobturator (TVT-O) vaginal tape: why do tapes fail? Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haverkorn RM, Williams BJ, Kubricht 3rd WS, et al. Is obesity a risk factor for failure and complications after surgery for incontinence and prolapse in women? J Urol. 2011;185(3):987–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hellberg D, Holmgren C, Lanner L, et al. The very obese woman and the very old woman: tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(4):423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Svenningsen R, Staff AC, Schiotz HA, et al. Risk factors for long-term failure of the retropubic tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013. doi:10.1002/nau.22466.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Staack A, Vitale J, Ragavendra N, et al. Translabial ultrasonography for evaluation of synthetic mesh in the vagina. Urology. 2014;83(1):68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lo TS, Horng SG, Liang CC, et al. Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Urology. 2004;63(4):671–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Agur W, Riad M, Secco S, et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur Urol. 2013;64(2):323–36. A recent review and meta-analysis that suggests there is a lack of quality evidence assessing the various treatments for recurrent SUI.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Riad M, Familusi A, El Sayed M, et al. Current practice in the UK for the assessment and management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22 Suppl 1:S63–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lovatsis D, Easton W, Wilkie D. Guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of recurrent urinary incontinence following pelvic floor surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(9):893–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bradley CS, Rovner ES. Urodynamically defined stress urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction coexist in women. J Urol. 2004;171(2 Pt 1):757–60. discussion 760-751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petrou SP, Young PR. Rate of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after retropubic urethrolysis. J Urol. 2002;167(2 Pt 1):613–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldman HB, Rackley RR, Appell RA. The efficacy of urethrolysis without re-suspension for iatrogenic urethral obstruction. J Urol. 1999;161(1):196–8. discussion 198-199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldman HB. Simple sling incision for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction. Urology. 2003;62(4):714–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Petrou SP, Frank I. Complications and initial continence rates after a repeat pubovaginal sling procedure for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2001;165(6 Pt 1):1979–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chaikin DC, Rosenthal J, Blaivas JG. Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1312–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, Pringle S, et al. Evaluation of transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes in management of women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2011;77(5):1070–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Tension-free vaginal tape in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous failed midurethral tape. Eur Urol. 2009;55(6):1450–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Repeat synthetic mid urethral sling procedure for women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183(1):241–6. A large cohort study comparing outcomes between primary and secondary suburethral slings.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rezapour M, Falconer C, Ulmsten U. Tension-Free vaginal tape (TVT) in stress incontinent women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD)–a long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12 Suppl 2:S12–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bakali E, Buckley BS, Hilton P, et al. Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2, CD009407. Cochrane Review that found there was no data to recommend or refute any of the different management strategies for recurrent SUI after failed suburethral tape surgery.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lo TS, Wang AC, Liang CC, et al. Treatment for unsuccessful tension-free vaginal tape operation by shortening pre-implanted tape. J Urol. 2006;175(6):2196–9. discussion 2199-2200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Landsheere L, Lucot JP, Foidart JM, et al. Management of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence after TVT-O by mesh readjustment. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(11):1347–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Han JY, Moon KH, Park CM, et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: tape tightening or repeat sling? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(9):1279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. De Cuyper EM, Ismail R, Maher CF. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(5):681–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Giarenis I, Mastoroudes H, Cardozo L, et al. What do we do when a midurethral tape fails? Rediscovery of open colposuspension as a salvage continence operation. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(8):1117–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee HN, Lee YS, Han JY, et al. Transurethral injection of bulking agent for treatment of failed mid-urethral sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(12):1479–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Webster GD, Perez LM, Khoury JM, et al. Management of type III stress urinary incontinence using artificial urinary sphincter. Urology. 1992;39(6):499–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Costa P, Mottet N, Rabut B, et al. The use of an artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III incontinence and a negative Marshall test. J Urol. 2001;165(4):1172–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Lara S. MacLachlan and Dr. Eric S. Rovner each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric S. Rovner.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacLachlan, L.S., Rovner, E.S. Management of Failed Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery. Curr Urol Rep 15, 429 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0429-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0429-y

Keywords

Navigation