Purpose of Review
Up to 20–30% of patients with Peyronie’s disease (PD) suffer from some degree of erectile dysfunction (ED). When medical management fails, the surgical approach towards those with PD and ED relies on the penile prosthesis.
Graft material has advanced in recent years, and hemostatic patch material has emerged as a promising, easy to use, and cost-effective approach. Intracorporal techniques that obviate the need for neurovascular bundle mobilization have recently been described, and can be considered a frontier for further investigation.
A thorough literature review was performed using the PubMed online database with query: “Penile Prosthesis” and “Peyronie’s disease” with “Plaque excision,” “Plaque incision,” “Tunica albuginea plication,” “Modeling,” and “Excision and grafting.” While the three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is commonly used, malleable implants may also achieve success where three-pieces are unavailable or not appropriate for use. When implant alone does not correct the deformity, manual modeling is a mainstay in treating residual curvature. Tunica plication, incision, and excision/graft techniques are required in patients with more severe/complicated plaques.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Khera M, Bella A, Karpman E, Brant W, Christine B, Kansas B, et al. Penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease: results of the PROPPER study demonstrates a decrease in patient-reported depression. J Sex Med. 2018;15(5):786–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.024.
Anaissie J, Yafi FA. A review of surgical strategies for penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(3):342–50. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.04.04.
Rajpurkar A, Dhabuwala CB. Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. J Urol. 2003;170(1):159–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000072524.82345.6d.
Mulhall J, Ahmed A, Anderson M. Penile prosthetic surgery for Peyronie’s disease: defining the need for intraoperative adjuvant maneuvers. J Sex Med. 2004;1(3):318–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.04046.x.
Lyons MD, Carson CC, Coward RM. Special considerations for placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis for the patient with Peyronie’s disease: techniques and patient preference. Med Devices Auckl NZ. 2015;8:331–40. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S57252.
Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM, Ingleright BJ. AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1633–5.
Segal RL, Burnett AL. Surgical management for Peyronie’s disease. World J Mens Health. 2013;31(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2013.31.1.1.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1121–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32519-3.
DiBlasio CJ, Kurta JM, Botta S, et al. Peyronie’s disease compromises the durability and component-malfunction rates in patients implanted with an inflatable penile prosthesis. BJU Int. 2010;106(5):691–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09194.x.
Krishnappa P, Fernandez-Pascual E, Carballido J, Moncada I, Lledo-Garcia E, Martinez-Salamanca JI. Surgical management of Peyronie’s disease with co-existent erectile dysfunction. Sex Med. 2019;7(4):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2019.08.009.
Garaffa G, Minervini A, Christopher NA, Minhas S, Ralph DJ. The management of residual curvature after penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1152–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10023.x.
Stember DS, Kohler TS, Morey AF. Management of perforation injuries during and following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2015;12(Suppl 7):456–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12997.
Sadeghi-Nejad H. Penile prosthesis surgery: a review of prosthetic devices and associated complications. J Sex Med. 2007;4(2):296–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00434.x.
Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. Distal penile shaft reconstruction and reinforcement: the “double-windsocks” technique. J Sex Med. 2013;10(10):2571–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12263.
Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):1880–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02281.x.
Antonini G, De Berardinis E, Del Giudice F, et al. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement, scratch technique and postoperative vacuum therapy as a combined approach to definitive treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2018;200(3):642–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.060.
Shaeer O, Soliman Abdelrahman IF, Mansour M, Shaeer K. Shaeer’s punch technique: transcorporeal Peyronie’s plaque surgery and penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2020;17(7):1395–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.03.018.
Gholami SS, Lue TF. Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patients. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2066–9.
Chung PH, Scott JF, Morey AF. High patient satisfaction of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion with synchronous penile plication for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2014;11(6):1593–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12530.
Cordon BH, Osmonov D, Hatzichristodoulou G, Morey AF. Peyronie’s penile plication. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):639–44. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.18.
Yafi FA, Sangkum P, McCaslin IR, Hellstrom WJG. Strategies for penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie’s disease and corporal fibrosis. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(4):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0491-0.
Papagiannopoulos D, Yura E, Levine L. Examining postoperative outcomes after employing a surgical algorithm for management of Peyronie’s disease: a single-institution retrospective review. J Sex Med. 2015;12(6):1474–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12910.
Levine LA, Dimitriou RJ. A surgical algorithm for penile prosthesis placement in men with erectile failure and Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12(3):147–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900515.
Farrell MR, Abdelsayed GA, Ziegelmann MJ, Levine LA. A comparison of hemostatic patches versus pericardium allograft for the treatment of complex Peyronie’s disease with penile prosthesis and plaque incision. Urology. 2019;129:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.008.
Hatzichristodoulou G. The PICS technique: a novel approach for residual curvature correction during penile prosthesis implantation in patients with severe Peyronie’s disease using the collagen fleece TachoSil. J Sex Med. 2018;15(3):416–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.12.012.
Hatzichristodoulou G, Yang DY, Ring JD, Hebert KJ, Ziegelman MJ, Köhler TS. Multicenter experience using collagen fleece for plaque incision with grafting to correct residual curvature at the time of inflatable penile prosthesis placement in patients with Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2020;17(6):1168–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.02.019.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Male Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders
About this article
Cite this article
Tonzi, M., Shridharani, A. Management of Peyronie’s Disease During Placement of Penile Prosthesis. Curr Sex Health Rep (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00301-4
- Penile prosthesis
- Peyronie’s disease
- Plaque excision
- Plaque incision
- Tunica albuginea plication
- Excision and grafting