Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: a Research-to-Practice Perspective
- 911 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Globally, the majority of those who need mental health care worldwide lack access to high-quality mental health services. Stigma, human resource shortages, fragmented service delivery models, and lack of research capacity for implementation and policy change contribute to the current mental health treatment gap. In this review, we describe how health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are addressing the mental health gap and further identify challenges and priority areas for future research.
Common mental disorders are responsible for the largest proportion of the global burden of disease; yet, there is sound evidence that these disorders, as well as severe mental disorders, can be successfully treated using evidence-based interventions delivered by trained lay health workers in low-resource community or primary care settings. Stigma is a barrier to service uptake. Prevention, though necessary to address the mental health gap, has not solidified as a research or programmatic focus. Research-to-practice implementation studies are required to inform policies and scale-up services.
Four priority areas are identified for focused attention to diminish the mental health treatment gap and to improve access to high-quality mental health services globally: diminishing pervasive stigma, building mental health system treatment and research capacity, implementing prevention programs to decrease the incidence of mental disorders, and establishing sustainable scale up of public health systems to improve access to mental health treatment using evidence-based interventions.
KeywordsGlobal mental health Implementation science Task-sharing Low- and middle-income countries Primary care
The editors would like to thank Drs. Nakita Natala, Heidi Burns, and Daniel Wurzelmann for taking the time to review this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Milton L. Wainberg, Pamela Scorza, James M. Shultz, Liat Helpman, Jennifer J. Mootz, Karen A. Johnson, Yuval Neria, Jean-Marie E. Bradford, and Melissa R. Arbuckle declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Maria A. Oquendo’s family owns stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Oquendo receives royalties for the commercial use of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 4.• Bass JK, Annan J, McIvor Murray S, Kaysen D, Griffiths S, Cetinoglu T, et al. Controlled trial of psychotherapy for Congolese survivors of sexual violence. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2182–91. A randomized controlled trial in a conflict-affected region of the Democratic Republic of Congo showed the effectiveness of an adapted group cognitive processing therapy intervention delivered by community-based paraprofessionals for reducing anxiety and depression symptoms in adults PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rahman A, Malik A, Sikander S, Roberts C, Creed F. Cognitive behaviour therapy-based intervention by community health workers for mothers with depression and their infants in rural Pakistan: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):902–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Patel V, Weiss HA, Chowdhary N, Naik S, Pednekar S, Chatterjee S, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention led by lay health counsellors for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care in Goa, India (MANAS): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9758):2086–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Vieira MA, Gadelha AA, Moriyama TS, Bressan RA, Bordin IA. Evaluating the effectiveness of a training program that builds teachers’ capability to identify and appropriately refer middle and high school students with mental health problems in Brazil: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):210.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.•• Chisholm D, Sweeny K, Sheehan P, Rasmussen B, Smit F, Cuijpers P, et al. Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(5):415–24. Return on investment analysis showed that returns to investment on scaling up effective treatment coverage for depression and anxiety disorders globally reults in benefit to cost ratios of up to 5.7 to 1 when the value of health returns is also included PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Petersen I, Evans-Lacko S, Semrau M, Barry MM, Chisholm D, Gronholm P, et al. Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population-and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low-and middle-income countries. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2016;10(1):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.WHO. mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in nonspecialized health settings version 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
- 18.Collins PY, Pringle BA. Building a global mental health research workforce: perspectives from the National Institute of Mental Health. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;40:1–4.Google Scholar
- 19.Saxena S, Saraceno B, Granstein J. Scaling up mental health care in resource-poor settings. Improving Mental Health Care: The Global Challenge. 2013;12–24.Google Scholar
- 20.Sweetland AC, Oquendo MA, Carlson C, Magidson JF, Wainberg ML. Mental health research in the global era: training the next generation. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;40:1–6.Google Scholar
- 29.• Lund C, Tomlinson M, Patel V. Integration of mental health into primary care in low-and middle-income countries: the PRIME mental healthcare plans. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208(s56):s1–3. A blueprint is given for developing and testing district mental health plans in low and middle income countries PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, Lovell K, Richards D, Gask L, et al. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Libr. 2012;10:CD006525.Google Scholar
- 33.Mendenhall E, De Silva MJ, Hanlon C, Petersen I, Shidhaye R, Jordans M, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of using non-specialist health workers to deliver mental health care: stakeholder perceptions from the PRIME district sites in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa, and Uganda. Soc Sci Med. 2014;118:33–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.• Brooke-Sumner C, Petersen I, Asher L, Mall S, Egbe CO, Lund C. Systematic review of feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia in low and middle income countries. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:19. Preliminary evidence suggests acceptability of community-based psychosocial intervents for schizophrenia in LMICs, however well-designed interventions studies are need to provide evidence for overall feasibility PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Da Silva TFC, Lovisi G, Conover S, Susser E. Critical time intervention–task shifting (CTI-TS): a psychosocial intervention for people with severe mental illness in Latin America. Global Advanced Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2014;3(5):087–9.Google Scholar
- 54.• Thornicroft G, Mehta N, Clement S, Evans-Lacko S, Doherty M, Rose D, et al. Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1123–32. Social contact was found to be the most effective type of intervention to improve stigma-related knowledge and attitudes in the short term, but evidence for longer-term benefits is weak PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.• Barry MM, Clarke AM, Jenkins R, Patel V. A systematic review of the effectiveness of mental health promotion interventions for young people in low and middle income countries. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:835. Mental health promotion interventions for young people have been implemented effectively in LMIC school and community settings with moderate to strong evidence of their impact on positive and negative mental health outcomes, but evidence for interventions for younger children is lacking PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.O'Donnell K, Dorsey S, Gong W, Ostermann J, Whetten R, Cohen JA, et al. Treating maladaptive grief and posttraumatic stress symptoms in orphaned children in Tanzania: group-based trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy. J Trauma Stress. 2014;27(6):664–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Abramsky T, Devries K, Kiss L, Nakuti J, Kyegombe N, Starmann E, et al. Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala. Uganda BMC Med. 2014;12(1):122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 66.Sumner SAMA, Saul J, et al. Prevalence of sexual violence against children and use of social services- seven countries, 2007–13. 2015.Google Scholar
- 68.Guedes A, Bott S, Garcia-Moreno C, Colombini M. Bridging the gaps: a global review of intersections of violence against women and violence against children. Global health action. 2016;9.Google Scholar
- 72.• Herba CM, Glover V, Ramchandani PG, Rondon MB. Maternal depression and mental health in early childhood: an examination of underlying mechanisms in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:983. A biopsychosocial model is used to show that the mechanisms underlying associations between maternal depression and child mental health outcomes are impacted by the problematic context in which maternal depression occurs in LMICs PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76.• Rahman A, Fisher J, Bower P, Luchters S, Tran T, Yasamy T, et al. Interventions for common perinatal mental disorders in women in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(8):593–601. The pooled effect size for maternal depression was moderately strong in interventions delivered by trained community health workers in LMICs PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.Organization WH. Thinking healthy: a manual for psychosocial management of perinatal depression, WHO generic field-trial version 1.0, 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.Google Scholar
- 84.Kates J, The U.S. Government and global LGBT health: opportunities and challenges in the current era. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: Menlo Park; 2014.Google Scholar
- 94.•• Becker AE, Kleinman A. Mental health and the global agenda. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(1):66–73. An outline is given for how to reduce the mental health treatment gap by building clinical capacity, developing new models of treatment, creating a focused and relevant research agenda, and overcoming barriers to equitable care PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 95.• Joshi R, Alim M, Kengne AP, Jan S, Maulik PK, Peiris D, et al. Task shifting for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income countries–a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103754. A review shows preliminary evidence of the effectiveness and affordability of the use of non-physician health care workers for improving access to healthcare for non-communicable diseases, including mental health, however, such programs need to be accompanied by health system re-structuring, and additional high-quality studies are required to support preliminary evidence PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 98.•• Meffert SM, Neylan TC, Chambers DA, Verdeli H. Novel implementation research designs for scaling up global mental health care: overcoming translational challenges to address the world's leading cause of disability. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016;10:19. A new type of implementation science study design, effectiveness-implementation hybrids, are proposed to speed the translation and scale up of mental health care in LMICs PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 105.• Chisholm D, Burman-Roy S, Fekadu A, Kathree T, Kizza D, Luitel NP, et al. Estimating the cost of implementing district mental healthcare plans in five low-and middle-income countries: the PRIME study. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208(s56):s71–s8. The cost of scaling up mental health services in four LMICs ranged from US$0.21 to 0.56 per person; in the higher income context of South Africa, it was US$1.86), and in all countries, the additional amount needed each year to reach target coverage goals after 10 years was below $0.10 per person PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar