Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Low-Magnitude Forces for Bone Modeling and Remodeling in Dentofacial Orthopedics

  • Craniofacial Skeleton (G Roberts, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Osteoporosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To examine the evidence in support of light continuous forces for enhancing bone adaptation (modeling and remodeling) in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.

Recent Findings

Clinical evidence suggests that light continuous orthodontic force can achieve physiologic expansion of the maxillary arch, but the long-term stability and the biological effects of the procedure are unclear. Compared to conventional orthodontic appliances that deliver heavy interrupted forces for tooth movement, the application of low-magnitude forces in animal models leads to anabolic modeling and remodeling of the alveolar bone in the path of orthodontic tooth movement. This results in dental translation and expansion of the alveolar process.

Summary

Light continuous forces are preferable to heavy forces for more physiologic dentofacial orthopedics. The interaction of low-magnitude loads with soft tissue posture achieves therapeutic adaptation of the craniofacial skeleton. The increasing emphasis on genomic medicine and personalized treatment planning should focus on low-magnitude loads in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance ••Of major importance

  1. McCormack SW, Witzel U, Watson PJ, Fagan MJ, Groning F. The biomechanical function of periodontal ligament fibres in orthodontic tooth movement. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts WE, Huja SS. Bone Physiology, Metabolism, and Biomechanics in Orthodontic Practice. In: Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, KWL V, Huang GJ, editors. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, 6e. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. p. 99–153.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wise GE, King GJ. Mechanisms of tooth eruption and orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res. 2008;87(5):414–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Melsen B. Tissue reaction and biomechanics. Front Oral Biol. 2016;18:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang H, Williams RC, Kyrkanides S. Accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: molecular mechanisms. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146(5):620–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang C, Li Z, Quan H, Xiao L, Zhao J, Jiang C, et al. Osteoimmunology in orthodontic tooth movement. Oral Dis. 2015;21(6):694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moin S, Kalajzic Z, Utreja A, Nihara J, Wadhwa S, Uribe F, et al. Osteocyte death during orthodontic tooth movement in mice. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(6):1086–92. https://doi.org/10.2319/110713-813.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thilander B, Hatch N, Sun Z. The Biologic Basis of Orthodontics. In: Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, KWL V, Huang GJ, editors. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, 6e. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. p. 51–98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(4):469 e1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Masella RS, Meister M. Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(4):458–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Narimiya T, Wada S, Kanzaki H, Ishikawa M, Tsuge A, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Orthodontic tensile strain induces angiogenesis via type IV collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinase-12. J Periodontal Res. 2017;52(5):842–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuge A, Noda K, Nakamura Y. Early tissue reaction in the tension zone of PDL during orthodontic tooth movement. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;65:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.01.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roerink ME, van der Schaaf ME, Dinarello CA, Knoop H, van der Meer JW. Interleukin-1 as a mediator of fatigue in disease: a narrative review. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0796-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Long P, Hu J, Piesco N, Buckley M, Agarwal S. Low magnitude of tensile strain inhibits IL-1beta-dependent induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and induces synthesis of IL-10 in human periodontal ligament cells in vitro. J Dent Res. 2001;80(5):1416–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800050601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Long P, Liu F, Piesco NP, Kapur R, Agarwal S. Signaling by mechanical strain involves transcriptional regulation of proinflammatory genes in human periodontal ligament cells in vitro. Bone. 2002;30(4):547–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Viecilli RF, Kar-Kuri MH, Varriale J, Budiman A, Janal M. Effects of initial stresses and time on orthodontic external root resorption. J Dent Res. 2013;92(4):346–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513480794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts WE, Viecilli RF, Chang C, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Biology of biomechanics: finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(6):943–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. On a path to unfolding the biological mechanisms of orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res. 2009;88(7):597–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509338914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0003:AUOBPA>2.0.CO;2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Akkaya S, Lorenzon S, Ucem TT. Comparison of dental arch and arch perimeter changes between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(3):255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tyrovola JB. The “Mechanostat theory” of frost and the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. J Cell Biochem. 2015;116(12):2724–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yee JA, Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Cheng LL, Darendeliler MA. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136(2):150 e1–9; discussion -1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.026.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quinn RS, Yoshikawa DK. A reassessment of force magnitude in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1985;88(3):252–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(1):86–92. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0086:OFMFOT>2.0.CO;2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iwasaki LR, Haack JE, Nickel JC, Morton J. Human tooth movement in response to continuous stress of low magnitude. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;117(2):175–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Antoun JS, Mei L, Gibbs K, Farella M. Effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontal tissues. Periodontol. 2017;74(1):140–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saffar JL, Lasfargues JJ, Cherruau M. Alveolar bone and the alveolar process: the socket that is never stable. Periodontol. 1997;13:76–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Edwards CB, Marshall SD, Qian F, Southard KA, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Longitudinal study of facial skeletal growth completion in 3 dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(6):762–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McNamara JA. Maxillary transverse deficiency. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;117(5):567–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Betts NJ, Vanarsdall RL, Barber HD, Higgins-Barber K, Fonseca RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10(2):75–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McNamara JA Jr. Long-term adaptations to changes in the transverse dimension in children and adolescents: an overview. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(4 Suppl):S71–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cross DL, McDonald JP. Effect of rapid maxillary expansion on skeletal, dental, and nasal structures: a postero-anterior cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22(5):519–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Iseri H, Ozsoy S. Semirapid maxillary expansion—a study of long-term transverse effects in older adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(1):71–8. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0071:SMESOL>2.0.CO;2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):1046–52. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[1046:LSCWRM]2.0.CO;2.

  35. Arat FE, Arat ZM, Tompson B, Tanju S. Muscular and condylar response to rapid maxillary expansion. Part 3: magnetic resonance assessment of condyle-disc relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(6):830–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Baysal A, Karadede I, Hekimoglu S, Ucar F, Ozer T, Veli I, et al. Evaluation of root resorption following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(3):488–94. https://doi.org/10.2319/060411-367.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1(1):52–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. LaBlonde B, Vich ML, Edwards P, Kula K, Ghoneima A. Three dimensional evaluation of alveolar bone changes in response to different rapid palatal expansion activation rates. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.089-097.oar.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gould MS, Picton DC. A study of pressures exerted by the lips and cheeks on the teeth of subjects with normal occlusion. Arch Oral Biol. 1964;9:469–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Proffit WR. Equilibrium theory revisited: factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthod. 1978;48(3):175–86. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1978)048<0175:ETRFIP>2.0.CO;2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Weinstein S. Minimal forces in tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1967;53(12):881–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ruan WH, Chen MD, Gu ZY, Lu Y, Su JM, Guo Q. Muscular forces exerted on the normal deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(5):785–90. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[785:MFEOTN]2.0.CO;2.

  43. Ruan WH, Su JM, Ye XW. Pressure from the lips and the tongue in children with class III malocclusion. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007;8(5):296–301. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0296.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. • Kraus CD, Campbell PM, Spears R, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Bony adaptation after expansion with light-to-moderate continuous forces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145(5):655–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.017. This study shows bone formation on the periosteal surfaces of cortical bone following expansion with a ligh-to-moderate continuous orthodonitc force.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. •• Utreja A, Bain C, Turek B, Holland R, AlRasheed R, Roberts WE. Maxillary expansion in an animal model with light, continuous force. Angle Orthod. 2018; https://doi.org/10.2319/070717-451.1. The authors demonstrate sutural expansion as well as buccal bone modeling and remodeling remodleing using a light, continuous orthodontic force for maxillary expansion.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1121 W Michigan St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA

    Achint Utreja

Authors
  1. Achint Utreja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achint Utreja.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Achint Utreja declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Craniofacial Skeleton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Utreja, A. Low-Magnitude Forces for Bone Modeling and Remodeling in Dentofacial Orthopedics. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16, 277–282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0437-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0437-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation