Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conscious Awareness in Patients in Vegetative States: Myth or Reality?

  • Behavior (HS Kirshner, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Do vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) patients experience emotions and have conscious awareness of themselves and their surroundings? Can neuroimaging clarify these questions? Neuroimaging responses to stimuli are classified into four levels: level 0 indicates no response; level 1 indicates responses limited to the primary sensory cortices; level 2 indicates activation of primary sensory cortices and higher-order associative areas; level 3 indicates activation of cortical regions to either mental imagery tasks or high-level language stimuli requiring distinction of ambiguous from unambiguous words. Level 0 or level 1 was noted in 125 of 193 VS patients (65 %) and 46 of 121 MCS patients (38 %), suggesting no evidence of conscious awareness. Level 2 or level 3 was observed in 68 of 193 VS patients (35 %) and 75 of 121 MCS patients (62 %), indicating some cognitive processing. These data may denote the presence of conscious awareness or may simply identify neuronal processing without phenomenological awareness. The pro and cons of these conflicting interpretations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giacino JT, Zasler ND, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Filley CM. Development of practice guidelines for assessment and management of the vegetative and minimally conscious states. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997;12:79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. •• Monti MM. Cognition in the vegetative state. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:431–54. This review shows that contrary to the initial belief, the “vegetative” brain can retain several high-level aspects of cognitive functions, across sensory modalities, including language processing and learning dynamics. Nonetheless, the residual cognitive functions observed in vegetative patients might reflect intact but functionally disconnected cortical modules that do not give rise to the subjective feeling of phenomenological awareness.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. To Him, It Was Still 1988: The ‘Coma Cop’ Awakens. In: Newsweek New York, NY: Newsweek; February 26, 1996.

  5. Brooks D. Beyond the brain. New York Times. 2013 Jun 18:A25.

  6. Celesia G. Persistent vegetative state: clinical and ethical issues. Theor Med. 1997;18(3):221–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cranford RE. The persistent vegetative state: the medical reality (getting the facts straight). Hastings Cent Rep. 1988;18:27–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: a syndrome in search of a name. Lancet. 1972;l:734–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jennett B. Thirty years of the vegetative state: clinical, ethical and legal problems. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:537–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The “death panel” debate. In: Chicago Tribume. 8/16/2009 edn. Chicago: Chicago tribune; 2009: page 22.

  11. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, Lavrijsen J, Leon-Carrion J, Sannita WG, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8:68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Childs NL, Mercer WN, Childs HW. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology. 1993;43(8):1465–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andrews K, Murphy L, Munday R, Littlewood C. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ. 1996;313(7048):13–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9(1):35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fingelkurts AA, Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Galardi G. Prognostic value of resting-state electroencephalography structure in disentangling vegetative and minimally conscious states: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(4):345–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Lanzillo B, Cozzolino A, Saltalamacchia A, et al. Predictors of recovery of responsiveness in prolonged anoxic vegetative state. Neurology. 2013;80(5):464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cruse D, Chennu S, Fernandez-Espejo D, Payne WL, Young GB, Owen AM. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state: electroencephalographic evidence for attempted movements to command. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49933.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heiss WD. PET in coma and in vegetative state. Eur J Neurol. 2011;19(2):207–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez-Espejo D, Bekinschtein T, Monti MM, Pickard JD, Junque C, Coleman MR, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging distinguishes the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):103–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bekinschtein TA, Manes FF, Villarreal M, Owen AM, Della-Maggiore V. Functional imaging reveals movement preparatory activity in the vegetative state. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011;5:5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. • Bardin J, Fins JJ, Katz DI, Hersh J, Heier LA, Tabelow K, et al. Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. Brain. 2011;134:769–82. This work studied fMRI of MCS patients instructed to respond to choices of whether or not to use imagery. No activation during these tasks reveals significant challenges in developing validated fMRI-based methods for clinical use and raises interesting questions about underlying brain function assayed using these methods in brain-injured subjects.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnakers C. Clinical assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. Arch Ital Biol. 2012;150(2–3):36–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Giacino J, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guldenmund P, Stender J, Heine L, Laureys S. Mindsight: diagnostics in disorders of consciousness. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:624724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bosco A, Lancioni GE, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Singh NN, O'Reilly MF, Sigafoos J. Vegetative state: efforts to curb misdiagnosis. Cogn Process. 2010;11(1):87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (2). N Engl J Med. 1994;330(22):1572–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Panksepp J, Fuchs T, Garcia VA, Lesiak A. Does any aspect of mind survive brain damage that typically leads to a persistent vegetative state? Ethical considerations. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007;2:32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fins JJ, Master MG, Gerber LM, Giacino JT. The minimally conscious state: a diagnosis in search of an epidemiology. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(10):1400–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schiff ND, Rodriguez-Moreno D, Kamal A, Kim KH, Giacino JT, Plum F, et al. fMRI reveals large-scale network activation in minimally conscious patients. Neurology. 2005;64(3):514–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Riganello F, Sannita WG. Residual brain processing in the vegetative state. J Psychophysiol. 2009;23(1):18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Overgaard M. How can we know if patients in coma, vegetative state or minimally conscious state are conscious? Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Levy D, Sidtis JJ, Rottenberg DA, Jarden JO, Strother SC, Dhawan V, et al. Differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in vegetative versus locked-in patients. Ann Neurol. 1987;22(6):673–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. De Volder AG, Goffinet AM, Bol A, Michel C, de Barsy T, Laterre C. Brain glucose metabolism in postanoxic syndrome. Positron emission tomographic study. Arch Neurol. 1990;47:197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Laureys S, Goldman S, Phillips C, et al. Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. Neuroimage. 1999;9:377–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rudolf J, Sobesky J, Grond M, Heiss WD. Identification by positron emission tomography of neuronal loss in acute vegetative state. Lancet. 2000;355:155.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Juengling FD, Kassubek J, Huppertz HJ, Krause T, Els T. Separating functional and structural damage in persistent vegetative state using combined voxel-based analysis of 3-D MRI and FDG-PET. J Neurol Sci. 2005;228(2):179–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim YW, Kim HS, An YS. Brain metabolism in patients with vegetative state after post-resuscitated hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: statistical parametric mapping analysis of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(5):888–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hall DA. Hemodynamic imaging of auditory cortex. In: Celesia GG, Heckok GS, editors. The human auditory system: fundamental organization and clinical disorders. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. In press.

  39. Newcombe VF, Williams GB, Scoffings D, Cross J, Carpenter TA, Pickard JD, et al. Aetiological differences in neuroanatomy of the vegetative state: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and functional implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(5):552–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brugge JF. Anatomy and physiology of auditory pathways and cortex. In: Celesia GG, editor. Disorders of peripheral and central auditory processing handbook of clinical neurophysiology, vol. 10. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013. p. 24–60.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bekinschtein T, Leiguarda R, Armony J, Owen A, Carpintiero S, Niklison J, et al. Emotion processing in the minimally conscious state. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(5):788.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Boly M, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P, Lambermont B, Damas P, Del Fiore G, et al. Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(2):233–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Laureys S, Perrin F, Faymonville ME, Schnakers C, Boly M, Bartsch V, et al. Cerebral processing in the minimally conscious state. Neurology. 2004;63(5):916–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science. 2006;313(5792):1402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Staffen W, Kronbichler M, Aichhorn M, Mair A, Ladurner G. Selective brain activity in response to one's own name in the persistent vegetative state. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(12):1383–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Coleman MR, Rodd JM, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS, Menon DK, Pickard JD, et al. Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Brain. 2007;130(10):2494–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Di HB, Yu SM, Weng XC, Laureys S, Yu D, Li JQ, et al. Cerebral response to patient's own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neurology. 2007;68(12):895–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fernandez-Espejo D, Junque C, Vendrell P, Bernabeu M, Roig T, Bargallo N, et al. Cerebral response to speech in vegetative and minimally conscious states after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008;22(11):882–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rousseau MC, Confort-Gouny S, Catala A, Graperon J, Blaya J, Soulier E, et al. A MRS-MRI-fMRI exploration of the brain. Impact of long-lasting persistent vegetative state. Brain Inj. 2008;22(2):123–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Coleman M, Davis MH, Rodd M, Robson T, Ali A, Owen AM, et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain. 2009;132:2541–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Fernandez-Espejo D, Junque C, Cruse D, Bernabeu M, Roig-Rovira T, Fabregas N, et al. Combination of diffusion tensor and functional magnetic resonance imaging during recovery from the vegetative state. BMC Neurol. 2010;10:77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rodriguez Moreno D, Schiff ND, Giacino J, Kalmar K, Hirsch J. A network approach to assessing cognition in disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2010;75(21):1871–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bruno MA, Majerus S, Boly M, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Gosseries O, et al. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol. 2011;259(6):1087–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Crone JS, Ladurner G, Höller Y, Golaszewski S, Trinka E, et al. Deactivation of the default mode network as a marker of impaired consciousness: an fMRI study. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26373.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, Boly M, Pickard JD, Tshibanda L, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(7):579–89.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Markl A, Yu T, Vogel D, Muller F, Kotchoubey B, Lang S. Brain processing of pain in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Brain Behav. 2013;3(2):95–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Boly M, Faymonville ME, Schnakers C, Peigneux P, Lambermont B, Phillips C, et al. Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:1013–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yu T, Lang S, Vogel D, Markl A, Müller F, Kotchoubey B. Patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome respond to the pain cries of other people. Neurology. 2013;80:345–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kotchoubey B, Merz S, Lang S, Markl A, Muller F, Yu T, et al. Global functional connectivity reveals highly significant differences between the vegetative and the minimally conscious state. J Neurol. 2013;260:975–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kassubek J, Juengling FD, Els T, Spreer J, Herpers M, Krause T, et al. Activation of a residual cortical network during painful stimulation in long-term postanoxic vegetative state: a 15O-H2O PET study. J Neurol Sci. 2003;212(1–2):85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhu J, Wu X, Gao L, Mao Y, Zhong P, Tang W, et al. Cortical activity after emotional visual stimulation in minimally conscious state patients. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(5):677–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Silva S, Alacoque X, Fourcade O, Samii K, Marque P, Woods R, et al. Wakefulness and loss of awareness: brain and brainstem interaction in the vegetative state. Neurology. 2010;74(4):313–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu XH, Zhu JH, Gao L, Zhong P, Tang WJ, Zhou LF. Functional magnetic imaging of brain cortical activities in minimally conscious patients stimulated by visual presentation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;87(27):1894–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nachev P, Hacker PM. Covert cognition in the persistent vegetative state. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;91(1):68–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Sara M, Pistoia F, Cernera G, Sacco S. The consciousness dilemma: feel or feel of feeling? Arch Neurol. 2008;65(3):418. author reply 418-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Melloni L, Molina C, Pena M, Torres D, Singer W, Rodriguez E. Synchronization of neural activity across cortical areas correlates with conscious perception. J Neurosci. 2007;27(11):2858–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Naccache L, Gaillard R, Adam C, Hasboun D, Clemenceau S, Baulac M, et al. Cohen L A direct intracranial record of emotions evoked by subliminal words. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(21):7713–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Schwartz R, Schwartz M. The risks of reducing consciousness to neuroimaging. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(9):25–6. discussion W21-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Shea N, Bayne T. The vegetative state and the science of consciousness. Br J Philos Sci. 2010;61(3):459–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Greenberg DL. Comment on "Detecting awareness in the vegetative state". Science. 2007;315(5816):1221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Nachev P, Husain M. Comment on "Detecting awareness in the vegetative state". Science. 2007;315(5816):1221. author reply 1221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Celesia GG, Sannita WG. Can patients in vegetative state experience pain and have conscious awareness? Neurology. 2013;80(4):328–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. •• Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Demertzi A, Majerus S, Laureys S. What about pain in disorders of consciousness? AAPS J. 2012;14(3):437–44. In this review, the authors summarize recent findings about the neural substrates of nociception and pain in VS patients as well as recent behavioral assessment methods of nociception specifically designed for patients in altered states of consciousness. They discuss the implications for pain treatment in these patients.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Harrison AH, Connolly JF. Finding a way in: a review and practical evaluation of fMRI and EEG for detection and assessment in disorders of consciousness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(8):1403–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. De Salvo S, Bramanti P, Marino S. Clinical differentiation and outcome evaluation in vegetative and minimally conscious state patients: the neurophysiological approach. Funct Neurol. 2013;27(3):155–62.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Babiloni C, Sara M, Vecchio F, Pistoia F, Sebastiano F, Onorati P, et al. Cortical sources of resting-state alpha rhythms are abnormal in persistent vegetative state patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(4):719–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Isono M, Wakabayashi Y, Fujiki MM, Kamida T, Kobayashi H. Sleep cycle in patients in a state of permanent unconsciousness. Brain Inj. 2002;16(8):705–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Cruse D, Chennu S, Chatelle C, Bekinschtein TA, Fernandez-Espejo D, Pickard JD, et al. Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9809):2088–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Goldfine AM, Victor JD, Conte MM, Bardin JC, Schiff ND. Determination of awareness in patients with severe brain injury using EEG power spectral analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(11):2157–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Schabus M, Pelikan C, Chwala-Schlegel N, Weilhart K, Roehm D, Donis J, et al. Oscillatory brain activity in vegetative and minimally conscious state during a sentence comprehension task. Funct Neurol. 2011;26(1):31–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Boly M, Garrido MI, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, Boveroux P, Schnakers C, et al. Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science. 2011;332(6031):858–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Perrin F, Schnakers C, Schabus M, Degueldre C, Goldman S, Bredart S, et al. Brain response to one's own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(4):562–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Cavinato M, Volpato C, Silvoni S, Sacchetto M, Merico A, Piccione F. Event-related brain potential modulation in patients with severe brain damage. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(4):719–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Fischer C, Luaute J, Morlet D. Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(7):1032–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Schnakers C, Perrin F, Schabus M, Majerus S, Ledoux D, Damas P, et al. Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2008;71(20):1614–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Satel S, Lilienfeld SO. Brainwashed: the seductive appeal of mindless neuroscience. New York: Basic Books; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Gastone G. Celesia declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Loyola University of Chicago, 3016 Heritage Oak Lane, Oakbrook, IL, 60523, USA

    Gastone G. Celesia

  2. Chicago Council on Science and Technology, Illinois Institute of Technology, 10 W 35th St, Chicago, IL, 60616, USA

    Gastone G. Celesia

Authors
  1. Gastone G. Celesia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gastone G. Celesia.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Behavior

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Celesia, G.G. Conscious Awareness in Patients in Vegetative States: Myth or Reality?. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 13, 395 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-013-0395-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-013-0395-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation