Advertisement

Current HIV/AIDS Reports

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 292–303 | Cite as

Interventions to Improve Linkage to HIV Care in the Era of “Treat All” in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Systematic Review

  • Nicole KellyEmail author
  • Werner Maokola
  • Omobola Mudasiru
  • Sandra I. McCoy
Implementation Science (E Geng, Section Editor)
  • 224 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Implementation Science

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

In 2015, antiretroviral therapy (ART) was recommended for all people living with HIV (PLHIV) regardless of CD4 count (“Treat All”). To better understand how to improve linkage to care under these new guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating linkage interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa under Treat All.

Recent Findings

We identified 14 eligible articles and qualitatively analyzed the effectiveness of the interventions. Increases in linkage were reported by supply-side and counseling interventions. Mobile testing and economic incentives did not increase linkage.

Summary

Given the lag time between adoption and implementation, only two of the studies were conducted in a Treat All setting. None of the interventions specifically focused on re-linking PLHIV who had disengaged from care. Future studies must design interventions that target not only newly diagnosed or treatment naïve PLHIV, but should explicitly focus on PLHIV who have disengaged from care.

Keywords

HIV Linkage to care Intervention Treat all ART initiation Sub-Saharan Africa Treatment as prevention 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

The article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

11904_2019_451_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. WHO: World Health Organization; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):493–505.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1105243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):830–9.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, Vernazza P, Collins S, van Lunzen J, et al. Sexual activity without condoms and risk of HIV transmission in Serodifferent couples when the HIV-positive partner is using suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. 2016;316(2):171–81.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    • Miles to Go…. In: UNAIDS. Miles to go: closing gaps breaking barriers righting injustices. UNAIDS; 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03542.x. This report highlights global and regional gaps in linkage to HIV care by providing current estimates of PLHIV who are not accessing ART despite all PLHIV being eligible under Treat All.
  6. 6.
    Collaborators GH. Estimates of global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980–2015: the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(8):e361–e87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30087-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kharsany AB, Karim QA. HIV infection and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: current status, challenges and opportunities. Open AIDS J. 2016;10:34–48.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601610010034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox MP, Rosen S. A new cascade of HIV care for the era of "treat all". PLoS Med. 2017;14(4):e1002268.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babalola S, Van Lith LM, Mallalieu EC, Packman ZR, Myers E, Ahanda KS, et al. A framework for health communication across the HIV treatment continuum. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(Suppl 1):S5–S14.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNairy ML, Lamb MR, Gachuhi AB, Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha H, Burke S, Mazibuko S, et al. Effectiveness of a combination strategy for linkage and retention in adult HIV care in Swaziland: the Link4Health cluster randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002420.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maughan-Brown B, Smith P, Kuo C, Harrison A, Lurie MN, Bekker LG, et al. A conditional economic incentive fails to improve linkage to care and antiretroviral therapy initiation among HIV-positive adults in Cape Town, South Africa. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2018;32(2):70–8.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2017.0238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ayieko J, Petersen ML, van Rie A, Wafula E, Opudo W, Clark TD, et al. Effect of a patient-centered phone call by a clinical officer at time of HIV testing on linkage to care in rural Kenya. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(6):ofy126.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Labhardt ND, Ringera I, Lejone TI, Klimkait T, Muhairwe J, Amstutz A, et al. Effect of offering same-day ART vs usual health facility referral during home-based HIV testing on linkage to care and viral suppression among adults with HIV in Lesotho: the CASCADE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(11):1103–12.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elul B, Lamb MR, Lahuerta M, Abacassamo F, Ahoua L, Kujawski SA, et al. A combination intervention strategy to improve linkage to and retention in HIV care following diagnosis in Mozambique: a cluster-randomized study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002433.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cherutich P, Golden MR, Wamuti B, Richardson BA, Asbjornsdottir KH, Otieno FA, et al. Assisted partner services for HIV in Kenya: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2017;4(2):e74–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30214-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruzagira E, Grosskurth H, Kamali A, Baisley K. Brief counselling after home-based HIV counselling and testing strongly increases linkage to care: a cluster-randomized trial in Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(2):e25014.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asiimwe S, Ross JM, Arinaitwe A, Tumusiime O, Turyamureeba B, Roberts DA, et al. Expanding HIV testing and linkage to care in southwestern Uganda with community health extension workers. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(Suppl 4):21633.  https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.5.21633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sanga ES, Lerebo W, Mushi AK, Clowes P, Olomi W, Maboko L, et al. Linkage into care among newly diagnosed HIV-positive individuals tested through outreach and facility-based HIV testing models in Mbeya, Tanzania: a prospective mixed-method cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013733.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoffmann CJ, Mabuto T, Ginindza S, Fielding KL, Kubeka G, Dowdy DW, et al. Strategies to accelerate HIV care and antiretroviral therapy initiation after HIV diagnosis: a randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(5):540–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hewett PC, Nalubamba M, Bozzani F, Digitale J, Vu L, Yam E, et al. Randomized evaluation and cost-effectiveness of HIV and sexual and reproductive health service referral and linkage models in Zambia. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:785.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3450-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barnabas RV, van Rooyen H, Tumwesigye E, Brantley J, Baeten JM, van Heerden A, et al. Uptake of antiretroviral therapy and male circumcision after community-based HIV testing and strategies for linkage to care versus standard clinic referral: a multisite, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa and Uganda. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(5):e212–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)00020-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Desai MA, Okal DO, Rose CE, Ndivo R, Oyaro B, Otieno FO, et al. Effect of point-of-care CD4 cell count results on linkage to care and antiretroviral initiation during a home-based HIV testing campaign: a non-blinded, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2017;4(9):e393–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30091-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amanyire G, Semitala FC, Namusobya J, Katuramu R, Kampiire L, Wallenta J, et al. Effects of a multicomponent intervention to streamline initiation of antiretroviral therapy in Africa: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(11):e539–e48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30090-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosen S, Fox MP. Retention in HIV care between testing and treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2011;8(7):e1001056.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Govindasamy D, Meghij J, Kebede Negussi E, Clare Baggaley R, Ford N, Kranzer K. Interventions to improve or facilitate linkage to or retention in pre-ART (HIV) care and initiation of ART in low- and middle-income settings--a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19032.  https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.19032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruzagira E, Baisley K, Kamali A, Biraro S, Grosskurth H. Working group on linkage to HIVC. Linkage to HIV care after home-based HIV counselling and testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Tropical Med Int Health. 2017;22(7):807–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharma M, Ying R, Tarr G, Barnabas R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of community and facility-based HIV testing to address linkage to care gaps in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature. 2015;528(7580):S77–85.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. ImplementationSci. 2006;1(1).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.
  30. 30.
    Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2010;38(2):65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    The World Bank. Sub-Saharan Africa. https://data.worldbank.org/region/ sub-saharanafrica. 2018.
  32. 32.
    Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
  33. 33.
    Use of antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants. WHO: World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    The Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health. Consolidated guidelines for prevention and treatment of HIV in Uganda.; 2016.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    The Zambian Ministry of Health. Zambia consolidated guidelines for treatment and prevention of HIV infection.; 2014.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ministry of Health; National AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP). Guidelines on use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: a rapid advice; 2014.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    National AIDS/STI Control Program (NASCOP). Guidelines for antiretroviral therapy in Kenya. 4th Edition. Nairobi, Kenya; 2011.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Yotebieng M, Brazier E, Addison D, Kimmel AD, Cornell M, Keiser O, et al. Research priorities to inform "treat all" policy implementation for people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a consensus statement from the international epidemiology databases to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA). J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(1):e25218.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25218 This paper specifically notes that improving linkage to HIV care is a critical research priority for Sub-Saharan Africa in the era of Treat All. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    World Health Organization. WHO HIV policy adoption and implementation status in countries. WHO; 2018.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fox MP, Rosen S. Retention of adult patients on antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis 2008-2013. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(1):98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gentilini U. Revisiting the ‘cash versus food’ debate: new evidence for an old puzzle. World Bank Res Obs. 2016;31:135–67.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thurow L. Cash versus in-kind transfers. Am Econ Rev. 1974;64(2):190–5.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Knol MJ, Le Cessie S, Algra A, Vandenbroucke JP, Groenwold RH. Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: alternatives to logistic regression. CMAJ. 2012;184(8):895–9.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Kelly
    • 1
    Email author
  • Werner Maokola
    • 1
    • 2
  • Omobola Mudasiru
    • 1
  • Sandra I. McCoy
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and ChildrenMinistry of HealthDar es SalaamTanzania

Personalised recommendations