Making Smarter Decisions Faster: Systems Engineering to Improve the Global Public Health Response to HIV
- 194 Downloads
Purpose of Review
This review offers an operational definition of systems engineering (SE) as applied to public health, reviews applications of SE in the field of HIV, and identifies opportunities and challenges of broader application of SE in global health.
SE involves the deliberate sequencing of three steps: diagnosing a problem, evaluating options using modeling or optimization, and providing actionable recommendations. SE includes diverse tools (from process improvement to mathematical modeling) applied to decisions at various levels (from local staffing decisions to planning national-level roll-out of new interventions). Contextual factors are crucial to effective decision-making, but there are gaps in understanding global decision-making processes. Integrating SE into pre-service training and translating SE tools to be more accessible could increase utilization of SE approaches in global health.
SE is a promising, but under-recognized approach to improve public health response to HIV globally.
KeywordsImplementation science Systems engineering HIV Public health approach
ADW was supported by F32HD088204, JC was supported by R01MH113435, BHW was supported by K01MH110599, and support was provided by the Implementation Science Core of the University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS Research, an NIH-funded program under award number AI027757 which is supported by the following NIH Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NIMH, NIDA, NICHD, NHLBI, NIA, NIGMS, and NIDDK. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.UNAIDS (2018) Miles to go: closing gaps, breaking barriers, righting injustices. Geneva.Google Scholar
- 3.Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
- 7.NASA (2007) NASA Systems Engineering Handbook.Google Scholar
- 9.Deming WE (2018) The new economics for industry, government, education, third. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- 10.Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 13.Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 14.• Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G. Building a better delivery system: a new engineering/health care partnership. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. This work describes systems engineering applied to health care, both a framework and action plan. Google Scholar
- 15.Tu SP, Feng S, Storch R, Yip MP, Sohng HY, Fu M, et al. Applying systems engineering to implement an evidence-based intervention at a community health center. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23:1399–409. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2012.0190.
- 18.Korenromp E, Komatsu R, Katz I, et al (2007) Operational research on HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria control in Global Fund-supported programmes: round 1-6 grants. In: 5th European conference on tropical medicine and international health. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- 20.•• Monks T. Operational research as implementation science: definitions, challenges and research priorities. Implement Sci. 2016;11:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0444-0. This text highlights the role of operations research within implementation science and offers practical examples of models used to answer questions that saved time and money. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Boy GA, Narkevicius JM. Unifying human centered design and systems engineering for human systems integration. Complex Syst Des Manag. 2014:151–62.Google Scholar
- 25.Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
- 26.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
- 27.•• Sherr K, Gimbel S, Rustagi A, et al. Systems analysis and improvement to optimize pMTCT (SAIA): a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2014;9:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-55. This is an example of three systems engineering tools packaged together into an effective intervention to improve prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in 3 African countries. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Armitage G, Hodgson I, Wright J, Bailey K, Mkhwana E. Exploring the delivery of antiretroviral therapy for symptomatic HIV in Swaziland: threats to the successful treatment and safety of outpatients attending regional and district clinics. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:52–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.• Golden LM, Fairlie L, Might F, Mojela S, Motsamai D, Motshepe S, et al. HIV retesting in pregnant women in South Africa: outcomes of a quality improvement project targeting health systems’ weaknesses. South Afr J HIV Med. 2018;19:784. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.784.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Pintye J, Kinuthia J, Roberts DA, Wagner AD, Mugwanya K, Abuna F, et al. Integration of PrEP services into routine antenatal and postnatal care: experiences from an implementation program in Western Kenya. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79:590–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Baddour AA, Saleh HA. Use Six Sigma approach to improve healthcare worker safety. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2013;18:54–68.Google Scholar
- 39.Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) science of improvement: how to improve. www.ihi.org/resources/pages/howtoimprove/scienceofimprovementhowtoimprove.aspx. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
- 40.Wagner AD, Mugo C, Bluemer-Miroite S, Mutiti PM, Wamalwa DC, Bukusi D, et al. Continuous quality improvement intervention for adolescent and young adult HIV testing services in Kenya improves HIV knowledge. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;31:S243–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001531.Google Scholar
- 41.Kohler PK, Namate D, Barnhart S, Chimbwandira F, Tippet-Barr BA, Perdue T, et al. Classification and rates of adverse events in a Malawi male circumcision program: impact of quality improvement training. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1305-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Run Chart Tool. www.ihi.org/resources/pages/tools/runchart.aspx. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
- 45.Gimbel S, Voss J, Mercer MA, Zierler B, Gloyd S, Coutinho MJ, et al. The prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV cascade analysis tool: supporting health managers to improve facility-level service delivery. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-743.
- 47.Sibanda EL, Weller IV, Hakim JG, Cowan FM. The magnitude of loss to follow-up of HIV-exposed infants along the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission continuum of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;27:2787–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000027.Google Scholar
- 48.Deo S, Topp SM, Garcia A, Soldner M, Yagci Sokat K, Chipukuma J, et al. Modeling the impact of integrating HIV and outpatient health services on patient waiting times in an urban health clinic in Zambia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.•• Francke JA, Penazzato M, Hou T, Abrams EJ, MacLean RL, Myer L, et al. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of diagnosing HIV infection during early infancy in South Africa: test timing and frequency. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:1319–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw379. This is an example of using a complex mathematical model to decide between introduction of a new infant HIV testing timepoint or optimizing system performance for existing timepoints. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 59.Suraratdecha C, Stuart RM, Manopaiboon C, Green D, Lertpiriyasuwat C, Wilson DP, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in two hospitals in Thailand. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21:E25129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.Price JT, Wheeler SB, Stranix-Chibanda L, Hosek SG, Watts DH, Siberry GK, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding in sub-Saharan Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72:S145–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.Smith JA, Sharma M, Levin C, Baeten JM, van Rooyen H, Celum C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of community-based strategies to strengthen the continuum of HIV care in rural South Africa: a health economic modelling analysis. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e159–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00016-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 64.•• Cherutich P, Farquhar C, Wamuti B, et al. HIV partner services in Kenya: a cost and budget impact analysis study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:721. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3530-y. This is an example of a budget impact analysis that had direct impact on national policy in Kenya and accelerated translation of randomized controlled trial efficacy findings to programmatic scale up. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 65.• de Savigny D, Adam T. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. Excellent introduction to systems thinking in practical terms, with focus on context. Google Scholar
- 66.World Health Organization. Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva, Switzerland; 2007.Google Scholar
- 67.Hoffmann CJ, Milovanovic M, Kinghorn A, et al (2018) Value stream mapping to characterize value and waste associated with accessing HIV care in South Africa.Google Scholar
- 69.Kwena ZA, Njoroge BW, Cohen CR, Oyaro P, Shikari R, Kibaara CK, et al. The feasibility, time savings and economic impact of a designated time appointment system at a busy HIV care clinic in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18:19876. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.1.19876.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Henley C, Forgwei G, Welty T, Golden M, Adimora A, Shields R, et al. Scale-up and case-finding effectiveness of an HIV partner services program in Cameroon: an innovative HIV prevention intervention for developing countries. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;40:909–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.World Health Organization (2016) Guidelines on HIV self-testing and partner notification: supplement to consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services.Google Scholar
- 73.Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearb Med Inform. 2000;1:65–70.Google Scholar
- 74.•• Masyuko S, Mukui I, Njathi O, Kimani M, Oluoch P, Wamicwe J, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis rollout in a national public sector program: the Kenyan case study. Sex Health. 2018;15:578–86. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH18090. This is an example of a partnership between Kenyan Ministry of Health and technical modeling experts to design a rollout strategy for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis using a publically available and user-friendly simplified model interface. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 75.Avenir Health (2018) SPECTRUM.Google Scholar
- 76.Bhavaraju N, Muther K, Kiragu M, et al. Who, where, and how? Developing scenarios for the rollout of oral PrEP in Kenya. Paris, France: International AIDS Society; 2017.Google Scholar
- 77.AVAC PrEPWatch: OPTIONS plan 4 PrEP tool offers countries support for rollout. www.prepwatch.org/plan-4-prep-tool/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018.
- 78.Deo S, Crea L, Quevedo J, Lehe J, Vojnov L, Peter T, et al. Implementation and operational research: expedited results delivery systems using GPRS technology significantly reduce early infant diagnosis test turnaround times. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;70:e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 82.Gloyd S, Wagenaar BH, Woelk GB, Kalibala S. Opportunities and challenges in conducting secondary analysis of HIV programmes using data from routine health information systems and personal health information. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19:20847. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.5.20847.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 83.Wagenaar BH, Gimbel S, Hoek R, Pfeiffer J, Michel C, Manuel JL, et al. Effects of a health information system data quality intervention on concordance in Mozambique: time-series analyses from 2009-2012. Popul Health Metrics. 2015;13:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-015-0043-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 84.Njoroge A, Dunbar M, Betz B, et al (2016) Feasibility and acceptability of a biometric identification system using iris recognition in routine HIV services in Kenya. In: 9th International AIDS Society Conference (IAS). Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
- 85.Gimbel S, Coutinho J, Kawakyu N, et al (2018) Usability and feasibility of a provider decision support smartphone application for frontline health workers in Kenya and Mozambique. In: 5th Global Symposium on Health Services Research. Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
- 89.Petkovic J, Welch V, Jacob MH, Yoganathan M, Ayala AP, Cunningham H, et al. The effectiveness of evidence summaries on health policymakers and health system managers use of evidence from systematic reviews: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0530-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 91.Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, et al. Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD009401. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2.Google Scholar
- 93.• Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6:e1196–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3. These three texts frame the need for systems engineering within the global focus on quality.
- 94.• Berwick D, Snair M, Nishtar S. Crossing the global health quality chasm: a key component of universal health coverage. JAMA. 2018;320:1317–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13696. These three texts frame the need for systems engineering within the global focus on quality.
- 95.• World Health Organization, World Bank (2018) Delivering quality health services: a global imperative for universal health coverage. Geneva, Switzerland. These three texts frame the need for systems engineering within the global focus on quality. Google Scholar