Current Diabetes Reports

, 17:107 | Cite as

A Review of Technology-Assisted Interventions for Diabetes Prevention

Lifestyle Management to Reduce Diabetes/Cardiovascular Risk (B Conway and H Keenan, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Lifestyle Management to Reduce Diabetes/Cardiovascular Risk

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The high prevalence of prediabetes and success of the diabetes prevention program (DPP) has led to increasing efforts to provide readily accessible, cost-effective DPP interventions to the general public. Technology-assisted DPP interventions are of particular interest since they may be easier to widely distribute and sustain as compared to traditional in-person DPP. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of currently available technology-assisted DPP interventions.

Recent Findings

This review focuses on studies that have examined the use of mobile phone text messaging, smartphone/web-based apps, and telehealth programs to help prevent or delay the onset of incident type 2 diabetes. While there is variability in the results of studies focused on technology-assisted DPP and weight loss interventions, there is evidence to suggest that these programs have been associated with clinically meaningful weight loss and can be cost-effective.

Summary

Patients who are at risk for diabetes can be offered technology-assisted DPP and weight loss interventions to lower their risk of incident diabetes. Further research should determine what specific combination of intervention features would be most successful.

Keywords

Technology Mobile Diabetes prevention Weight loss Digital health 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Shira Grock, Jeong-hee Ku, Julie Kim, and Tannaz Moin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 6th ed. Brussels: International. Diabetes Federation; 2014. Available at: http://www.idf.og/diabetesatlas Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes in America: diabetes data compiled 1984. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prediabetes infographic, 2014. Availabe at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/prediabetes-infographic.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    • Long-term effects of lifestyle intervention or metformin on diabetes development and microvascular complications over 15-year follow-up: the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(11):866–75. This study provides the most recent evidence that the traditional DPP can prevent diabetes after 15 years follow-up.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Florez H, Pan Q, Ackermann RT, Marrero DG, Barrett-Connor E, Delahanty L, et al. Impact of lifestyle intervention and metformin on health-related quality of life: the diabetes prevention program randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(12):1594–601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diabetes Prevention Program Research G. The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(4):723–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, An Y, Gong Q, Gregg EW, et al. Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and diabetes incidence after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 23-year follow-up study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2014;2(6):474–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(4):537–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindstrom J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Eriksson JG, Hemio K, et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet. 2006;368(9548):1673–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cefalu WT, Buse JB, Tuomilehto J, Fleming GA, Ferrannini E, Gerstein HC, et al. Update and next steps for real-world translation of interventions for type 2 diabetes prevention: reflections from a diabetes care editors’ expert forum. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(7):1186–201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, Barr EA, Ballew SH, Gruber-Baldini AL. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):1934–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray GA, Delahanty L, et al. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(9):2102–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Ram J, Selvam S, Simon M, Nanditha A, et al. Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India: a prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1(3):191–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fischer HH, Fischer IP, Pereira RI, Furniss AL, Rozwadowski JM, Moore SL, et al. Text message support for weight loss in patients with prediabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(8):1364–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin M, Mahmooth Z, Dedhia N, Frutchey R, Mercado CE, Epstein DH, et al. Tailored, interactive text messages for enhancing weight loss among African American adults: the TRIMM randomized controlled trial. Am J Med. 2015;128(8):896–904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shapiro JR, Koro T, Doran N, Thompson S, Sallis JF, Calfas K, et al. Text4Diet: a randomized controlled study using text messaging for weight loss behaviors. Prev Med. 2012;55(5):412–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    • Block G, Azar KM, Romanelli RJ, Block TJ, Hopkins D, Carpenter HA, et al. Diabetes prevention and weight loss with a fully automated behavioral intervention by email, web, and mobile phone: a randomized controlled trial among persons with prediabetes. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(10):e240. This articles reviews a fully algorithm-driven behavioral support program to decrease the risk of T2DM. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fukuoka Y, Gay CL, Joiner KL, Vittinghoff E. A novel diabetes prevention intervention using a mobile app: a randomized controlled trial with overweight adults at risk. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2):223–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michaelides A, Raby C, Wood M, Farr K, Toro-Ramos T. Weight loss efficacy of a novel mobile diabetes prevention program delivery platform with human coaching. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4(1):e000264.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Sepah SC, Jiang L, Peters AL. Translating the diabetes prevention program into an online social network: validation against CDC standards. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(4):435–43. This article evaluates an online DPP intervention that utilizes many of the key technological features currently available. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sweet C CV, Gumpina R, Abbott P, Madero E.N., Payne M, Happe L, Matanich R, Renda A, Prewitt T. Outcomes of a digital health program with human coaching for diabetes risk reduction in a medicare population. Journal of Aging and Health. 2017:1–19.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahrendt AD, Kattelmann KK, Rector TS, Maddox DA. The effectiveness of telemedicine for weight management in the MOVE! program. The Journal of Rural Health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association. 2014;30(1):113–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Azar KM, Aurora M, Wang EJ, Muzaffar A, Pressman A, Palaniappan LP. Virtual small groups for weight management: an innovative delivery mechanism for evidence-based lifestyle interventions among obese men. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2015;5(1):37–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rutledge T, Skoyen JA, Wiese JA, Ober KM, Woods GN. A comparison of MOVE! versus TeleMOVE programs for weight loss in Veterans with obesity. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. 2017;11(3):344–51.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vadheim LM, McPherson C, Kassner DR, Vanderwood KK, Hall TO, Butcher MK, et al. Adapted diabetes prevention program lifestyle intervention can be effectively delivered through telehealth. Diabetes Educ. 2010;36(4):651–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://nccd.cdc.gov/DDT_DPRP/Registry.aspx?STATE=OTH
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Sepah SC, Jiang L, Peters AL. Long-term outcomes of a web-based diabetes prevention program: 2-year results of a single-arm longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moin T, Ertl K, Schneider J, Vasti E, Makki F, Richardson C, et al. Women veterans’ experience with a web-based diabetes prevention program: a qualitative study to inform future practice. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    • Schippers M, Adam PC, Smolenski DJ, Wong HT, de Wit JB. A meta-analysis of overall effects of weight loss interventions delivered via mobile phones and effect size differences according to delivery mode, personal contact, and intervention intensity and duration. Obes Rev. 2017;18(4):450–9. This meta-analysis provides a thorough review of mobile phone weight loss interventions. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chin SO, Keum C, Woo J, Park J, Choi HJ, Woo JT, et al. Successful weight reduction and maintenance by using a smartphone application in those with overweight and obesity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34563.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wieland LS, Falzon L, Sciamanna CN, Trudeau KJ, Brodney S, Schwartz JE, et al. Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012(8):CD007675.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations. Annals of Behavioral Medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;38(1):40–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Laing BY, Mangione CM, Tseng CH, Leng M, Vaisberg E, Mahida M, et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone application for weight loss compared with usual care in overweight primary care patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(10 Suppl):S5–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Allen JK, Stephens J, Dennison Himmelfarb CR, Stewart KJ, Hauck S. Randomized controlled pilot study testing use of smartphone technology for obesity treatment. J Obes. 2013;2013:151597.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shuger SL, Barry VW, Sui X, McClain A, Hand GA, Wilcox S, et al. Electronic feedback in a diet- and physical activity-based lifestyle intervention for weight loss: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee J, Kim J. Development and efficacy testing of a social network-based competitive application for weight loss. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(5):410–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Svetkey LP, Batch BC, Lin PH, Intille SS, Corsino L, Tyson CC, et al. Cell phone intervention for you (CITY): a randomized, controlled trial of behavioral weight loss intervention for young adults using mobile technology. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(11):2133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Patrick K, Norman GJ, Davila EP, Calfas KJ, Raab F, Gottschalk M, et al. Outcomes of a 12-month technology-based intervention to promote weight loss in adolescents at risk for type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(3):759–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD. Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(1):25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Smith KJ, Kuo S, Zgibor JC, McTigue KM, Hess R, Bhargava T, et al. Cost effectiveness of an internet-delivered lifestyle intervention in primary care patients with high cardiovascular risk. Prev Med. 2016;87:103–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Su W, Chen F, Dall TM, Iacobucci W, Perreault L. Return on investment for digital behavioral counseling in patients with prediabetes and cardiovascular disease. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McTigue KM, Conroy MB, Hess R, Bryce CL, Fiorillo AB, Fischer GS, et al. Using the internet to translate an evidence-based lifestyle intervention into practice. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(9):851–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Braithwaite RS, Meltzer DO, King JT Jr, Leslie D, Roberts MS. What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule? Med Care. 2008;46(4):349–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
  52. 52.
    Alva ML, Hoerger TJ, Jeyaraman R, Amico P, Rojas-Smith L. Impact of the YMCA of the USA diabetes prevention program on Medicare spending and utilization. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2017;36(3):417–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Consumer Health Information Corporation. Motivating patients to use smartphone health apps. 2011. Available at: http://www.consumer-health.com/motivating-patients-to-use-smartphone-health-apps/.
  54. 54.
    Gold BC, Burke S, Pintauro S, Buzzell P, Harvey-Berino J. Weight loss on the web: a pilot study comparing a structured behavioral intervention to a commercial program. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(1):155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Carter MC, Burley VJ, Cade JE. Weight loss associated with different patterns of self-monitoring using the mobile phone app My Meal Mate. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2017;5(2):e8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kim JY, Wineinger NE, Taitel M, Radin JM, Akinbosoye O, Jiang J, et al. Self-monitoring utilization patterns among individuals in an incentivized program for healthy behaviors. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Khaylis A, Yiaslas T, Bergstrom J, Gore-Felton C. A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: five key components. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(9):931–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Semper HM, Povey R, Clark-Carter D. A systematic review of the effectiveness of smartphone applications that encourage dietary self-regulatory strategies for weight loss in overweight and obese adults. Obes Rev. 2016;17(9):895–906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Coughlin SS, Hardy D, Caplan LS. The need for culturally-tailored smartphone applications for weight control. Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association. 2016;5(3):228–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sullivan DK, Goetz JR, Gibson CA, Mayo MS, Washburn RA, Lee Y, et al. A virtual reality intervention (second life) to improve weight maintenance: rationale and design for an 18-month randomized trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2016;46:77–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Azar KM, Lesser LI, Laing BY, Stephens J, Aurora MS, Burke LE, et al. Mobile applications for weight management: theory-based content analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(5):583–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shira Grock
    • 1
  • Jeong-hee Ku
    • 1
  • Julie Kim
    • 1
  • Tannaz Moin
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Department of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemsLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations