A Systematic Approach for the Prevention and Reduction of Hypoglycemia in Hospitalized Patients
- 339 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia (SH) in the inpatient setting are associated with poor outcomes. This review is designed to highlight approaches to predict and prevent inpatient hypoglycemia that has been successfully implemented focusing on developing overlapping policies and procedures that allow safe glycemic management to occur at all levels of the institution.
Standardizing point-of-care (POC) testing, nursing protocols, meal delivery, and formulary restriction are useful tools to prevent hypoglycemia. Informatics and real-time alert processes are highly effective tools to reduce hypoglycemia but require a significant investment in time and infrastructure as well as clear policies on how alerts are acted upon. Computerized dosing support technology and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology are an emerging area of investigation showing promising results.
Inpatient hypoglycemia is often predictable and preventable and requires institutional support to deliver targeted and safe diabetes care. This requires each institution to do periodic reassessment of policies and technologies. Future research needs to focus on the cost/benefits of interventions including studies of automated dosing algorithms as well as CGM in higher-risk patient populations.
KeywordsInpatient hypoglycemia Inpatient diabetes Insulin therapy Prediction and prevention of hypoglycemia
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Paulina Cruz Bravo and Mary Clare Blackburn declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Garry S. Tobin reports personal fees from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Janssen, and MannKind.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 9.Standards of medical care in diabetes—2017: summary of revisions. Diabetes care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S4–S5.Google Scholar
- 13.Gomez AM, Umpierrez GE, Munoz OM, Herrera F, Rubio C, Aschner P, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring versus capillary point-of-care testing for inpatient glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients hospitalized in the general ward and treated with a basal bolus insulin regimen. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;10(2):325–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.•• Milligan PE, Bocox MC, Pratt E, Hoehner CM, Krettek JE, Dunagan WC. Multifaceted approach to reducing occurrence of severe hypoglycemia in a large healthcare system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015;72(19):1631–41. This study reports the results of implementing glucometric measurements, standardized order sets and policies as well as best practices for diabetes care in 13 hospitals. It is an excellent example of a relatively low cost targeted intervetion and shows the additional value one achieves with implementing a predictive alert for hypoglycemia. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Hermayer K, Khan A, Olson DE, Newton C, et al. Randomized study comparing a basal-bolus with a basal plus correction insulin regimen for the hospital management of medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes: basal plus trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(8):2169–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Pasquel FJ, Gianchandani R, Rubin DJ, Dungan KM, Anzola I, Gomez PC, et al. Efficacy of sitagliptin for the hospital management of general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (Sita-Hospital): a multicentre, prospective, open-label, non-inferiority randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(2):125–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.•• Aloi J, Bode BW, Ullal J, Chidester P, RS MF, Bedingfield AE, et al. Comparison of an electronic glycemic management system versus provider-managed subcutaneous basal bolus insulin therapy in the hospital setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(1):12–6. This study was a crossover multicenter study looking at 999 non ICU patients comparing electronic glycemic management (EGM) versus provider directed basal bolus therapy. The study showed that the EGM group achieved improved glycemic control with lower incidence of hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL and <70 mg/dl) compared to basal bolus treatment managed by a provider. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.•• Maynard GA, Childers D, Holdych J, Kendall H, Hoag T, Harrison K. Improving glycemic control safely in non-critical care patients: a collaborative systems approach in nine hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017;43(4):179–88. This study reports the results of implementing glucometric measurements, standardized order sets and policies as well as best practices for diabetes care in 9 hospitals. It is an excellent example of a relatively low cost targeted intervetion. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.• Kilpatrick CR, Elliott MB, Pratt E, Schafers SJ, Blackburn MC, Heard K, et al. Prevention of inpatient hypoglycemia with a real-time informatics alert. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(10):621–6. This study was a prospective cohort study showing the value of a predictive hypoglycemia alert in an academic medical center. The alert process resulted in a significant decrease by 68% in the rate of SH in alerted high-risk patients versus nonalerted high-risk patients (3.1% vs 9.7%, P = 0.012). It was subsequently utilized in reference 21 above. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.• Rushakoff RJ, Sullivan MM, HW MM, Shah AD, Rajkomar A, Glidden DV, et al. Association between a virtual glucose management service and glycemic control in hospitalized adult patients: an observational study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(9):621–7. This study reports the value of a remote intervention and monitoring process targeting patients with persistent hyperglycemia as defined by 2 or more glucose values >12.5 mmol/l (225 mg/dl) or < 3.9 mmol/l ( 70mg/dl) in the last 24 hours. A virtual consult recommendation was placed in the patients electronic medical record after a virtual review of the chart. The recommendations were then reviewed by the patient’s treating providers and could then be implemented. The virtual consult process reduced hypoglycemia and improved the rates of hyperglycemia. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar