Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coronary Artery Calcium Score: the “Mammogram” of the Heart?

  • Public Health Policy (E Klodas, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To discuss the classic analogy of “coronary artery calcium (CAC) as a mammogram of the heart”, by evaluating the conceptual strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a potential cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening strategy using CAC in apparently healthy adults.

Recent Findings

CAC is typically used for further CVD risk assessment. CAC is also currently being used as a screening test in specific subgroups of individuals, particularly in some Asian countries. Although this has yielded valuable insights on the determinants and pathophysiology of CVD, whether this approach results in improved clinical outcomes compared to other assessment and management approaches is currently unclear.

Summary

Although CAC and mammograms share a number of characteristics, there are also important conceptual differences. The evidence supporting CAC, which is a robust CVD risk assessment tool, for CVD screening purposes is currently very limited, and further research is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of major importance

  1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. European Heart Network. European cardiovascular disease statistics 2017. Available online at: http://www.ehnheart.org/cvd-statistics/cvd-statistics-2017.html. Accessed June 1st, 2018.

  3. Sasayama S. Heart disease in Asia. Circulation. 2008;118(25):2669–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grey C, Jackson R, Schmidt M, Ezzati M, Asaria P, Exeter DJ, et al. One in four major ischaemic heart disease events are fatal and 60% are pre-hospital deaths: a national data-linkage study (ANZACS-QI 8). Eur Heart J. 2017;38(3):172–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(5):e259–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Cheh C, et al. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(25):2631–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lluis-Ganella C, Subirana I, Lucas G, Tomás M, Muñoz D, Sentí M, et al. Assessment of the value of a genetic risk score in improving the estimation of coronary risk. Atherosclerosis. 2012;222(2):456–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeevarethinam A, Venuraju S, Dumo A, Ruano S, Rosenthal M, Nair D, et al. Usefulness of carotid plaques as predictors of obstructive coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(8):910–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cainzos-Achirica M, Miedema MD, McEvoy JW, Cushman M, Dardari Z, Greenland P, et al. The prognostic value of high sensitivity C-reactive protein in a multi-ethnic population after >10 years of follow-up: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Int J Cardiol. 2018;264:158–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1336–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tota-Maharaj R, Blaha MJ, McEvoy JW, Blumenthal RS, Muse ED, Budoff MJ, et al. Coronary artery calcium for the prediction of mortality in young adults <45 years old and elderly adults >75 years old. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(23):2955–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Silverman MG, Blaha MJ, Krumholz HM, Budoff MJ, Blankstein R, Sibley CT, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium on coronary heart disease events in individuals at the extremes of traditional risk factor burden: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(33):2232–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Blankstein R, Agatston A, Rivera JJ, Virani SS, et al. Dyslipidemia, coronary artery calcium, and incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: implications for statin therapy from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2014;129(1):77–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S49–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamashima C, Ohta K, Kasahara Y, Katayama T, Nakayama T, Honjo S, et al. A meta-analysis of mammographic screening with and without clinical breast examination. Cancer Sci. 2015;106(7):812–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):330–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society recommendations for the early detection of breast cancer. Available online at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection/american-cancer-society-recommendations-for-the-early-detection-of-breast-cancer.html. Accessed June 1st, 2018.

  20. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(10):716–26, W-236.

  21. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(1):18–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. • Qazi AH, Zallaghi F, Torres-Acosta N, Thompson RC, O'Keefe JH. Computed tomography for coronary artery calcification scoring: mammogram for the heart. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58(5):529–36. Recent example of the notion of CAC as “mammogram of the heart” in the scientific literature.–36.

  23. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2889–934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. • Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Effectiveness of breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis to update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):244–55. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mammogram for breast cancer screening, conducted by the US Preventive Services Task Force

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paci E, Puliti D, Lopes Pegna A, Carrozzi L, Picozzi G, Falaschi F, et al. Mortality, survival and incidence rates in the ITALUNG randomised lung cancer screening trial. Thorax. 2017;72(9):825–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cancer Research UK. Lung cancer statistics. Available online at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/lung-cancer. Accessed June 1st, 2018.

  27. Cancer Research UK. Bowel cancer statistics. Available online at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bowel-cancer. Accessed June 1st, 2018.

  28. Januzzi JL Jr., Suchindran S, Coles A, Ferencik M, Patel MR, Hoffmann U, Ginsburg GS, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. High-sensitivity troponin I and coronary computed tomography in symptomatic outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease: insights from the PROMISE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar 9. pii: S1936-878X(18)30132–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.021. [Epub ahead of print].

  29. • Yeboah J, Young R, McClelland RL, Delaney JC, Polonsky TS, Dawood FZ, et al. Utility of nontraditional risk markers in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(2):139–47. Side by side comparison of several novel CVD risk assessment tools for further CVD risk assessment; among them, CAC showed the best performance.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Rivera JJ, Budoff MJ, Khan AN, Shaw LJ, et al. Mortality rates in smokers and nonsmokers in the presence or absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(10):1037–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferrières J. The French paradox: lessons for other countries. Heart. 2004;90(1):107–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Weidner G, Cain VS. The gender gap in heart disease: lessons from Eastern Europe. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:768–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cainzos-Achirica M, Rampal S, Chang Y, Ryu S, Zhang Y, Zhao D, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is associated with coronary calcium in young and middle-aged asymptomatic adults: the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(2):350–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jee SH, Batty GD, Jang Yu BY14, Oh DJ, Oh BH, Lee SH, et al. The Korean Heart Study: rationale, objectives, protocol, and preliminary results for a new prospective cohort study of 430,920 men and women. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(12):1484–92.

  35. Zhang Y, Chang Y, Ryu S, Cho J, Lee WY, Rhee EJ, et al. Thyroid hormones and mortality risk in euthyroid individuals: the Kangbuk Samsung health study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(7):2467–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang Y, Kim BK, Yun KE, Cho J, Zhang Y, Rampal S, et al. Metabolically-healthy obesity and coronary artery calcification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(24):2679–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Miedema MD, Petrone A, Shikany JM, Greenland P, Lewis CE, Pletcher MJ, et al. Association of fruit and vegetable consumption during early adulthood with the prevalence of coronary artery calcium after 20 years of follow-up: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Circulation. 2015;132(21):1990–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(13):1081–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. • Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Kazerooni EA, Narula J, et al. SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;11(1):74–84. Recommendations from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and the Society of Thoracic Radiology for CVD risk assessment using CAC, which include recommendations for CT re-scanning during follow-up.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Al Rifai M, Cainzos-Achirica M, Blaha MJ. Establishing the warranty of a coronary artery calcium score of zero. Atherosclerosis. 2015;238(1):1–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Naghavi M, Falk E, Hecht HS, Shah PK, Task Force SHAPE. The first SHAPE (Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education) guideline. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2006;5(4):187–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Preventive Services Task Force US. Using nontraditional risk factors in coronary heart disease risk assessment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(7):474–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. • Vonder M, van der Aalst CM, Vliegenthart R, van Ooijen PMA, Kuijpers D, Gratama JW, et al. Coronary artery calcium imaging in the ROBINSCA trial. Rationale, Design, and Technical Background Acad Radiol. 2018;25(1):118–28. Methods of the ROBINSCA trial, which will be aimed at assessing the value of CAC for CVD screening.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Blaha M, Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Khosa F, Rumberger JA, Berman D, et al. Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(6):692–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McClelland RL, Chung H, Detrano R, Post W, Kronmal RA. Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2006;113(1):30–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Raggi P. Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(10):1931–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Michos ED, Nasir K, Braunstein JB, Rumberger JA, Budoff MJ, Post WS, et al. Framingham risk equation underestimates subclinical atherosclerosis risk in asymptomatic women. Atherosclerosis. 2006;184(1):201–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. McEvoy JW, Diamond GA, Detrano RC, Kaul S, Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, et al. Risk and the physics of clinical prediction. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(8):1429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. • Gupta A, Lau E, Varshney R, Hulten EA, Cheezum M, Bittencourt MS, et al. The identification of calcified coronary plaque is associated with initiation and continuation of pharmacological and lifestyle preventive therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(8):833–42. Systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the implications of CAC for clinicians and patients in terms of subsequent preventive interventions.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Byrne D, O’Connor L, Jennings S, Bennett K, Murphy AW. A survey of GPs awareness and use of risk assessment tools and cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Irish Med J. 2015;108:204–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Reiner Z, Sonicki Z, Tedeschi-Reiner E. Physicians’ perception, knowledge and awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and adherence to prevention guidelines: the PERCRO-DOC survey. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:598–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2016. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus16.pdf#070. Accessed June 1st, 2018.

  54. Eurostat. Breast cancer screening statistics. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Breast_cancer_screening_statistics. Accessed June 1st, 2018.

  55. Kravchenko J, Berry M, Arbeev K, Lyerly HK, Yashin A, Akushevich I. Cardiovascular comorbidities and survival of lung cancer patients: Medicare data based analysis. Lung Cancer. 2015;88(1):85–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino C, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1267–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Grundy SM. Statins for all? Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(9):1443–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wald NJ, Law MR. A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%. BMJ. 2003;326(7404):1419–0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rozanski A, Gransar H, Shaw LJ, Kim J, Miranda-Peats L, Wong ND, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(15):1622–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. • McEvoy JW, Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Polonsky TS, Nasir K, Kaul S, et al. The Case For and Against a Coronary Artery Calcium Trial: means, motive, and opportunity. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(8):994–1002. Insightful discussion of the implications and challenges of potential experimental studies assessing CAC-guided CVD risk management strategies.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ambrosius WT, Polonsky TS, Greenland P, Goff DC Jr, Perdue LH, Fortmann SP, et al. Design of the value of imaging in enhancing the wellness of your heart (VIEW) trial and the impact of uncertainty on power. Clin Trials. 2012;9(2):232–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Cainzos-Achirica.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Miguel Cainzos-Achirica reports that he collaborates with RTI Health Solutions, an independent nonprofit research organization that does work for government agencies and pharmaceutical companies.

Catherine E. Handy reports grants from Conquer Cancer Foundation/Bristol Meyers Squibb.

Xavier Pinto reports grants from FIS-ISCIII and CIBER-ISCIII and personal fees from Amgen, Abbott, Sanofi, Lacer, Rubio, and Esteve.

Michael J. Blaha reports grants from NIH, FDA, AHA, and Aetna Foundation; grants and personal fees from Amgen Foundation; and personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, MedImmune, and Akcea.

Philip A. Di Carlo, Renato Quispe, Gerard Roura, Roger S. Blumentha, Josep Comin-Colet, and Xavier Corbella declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Public Health Policy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cainzos-Achirica, M., Di Carlo, P.A., Handy, C.E. et al. Coronary Artery Calcium Score: the “Mammogram” of the Heart?. Curr Cardiol Rep 20, 70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-018-1020-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-018-1020-9

Keywords

Navigation