Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department: Contrasting Evidence from Registries and Randomized Controlled Trials
- 135 Downloads
Purpose of Review
To compare outcomes between registries and randomized controlled trials of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)-based versus standard of care approaches to the initial evaluation of patients with acute chest pain.
Randomized trials have demonstrated CCTA to be a safe and efficient tool for triage of low- to intermediate-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Recent studies demonstrate heterogeneous result using different standard of care approaches for evaluation of hard endpoints in comparison with standard evaluation. Also, there has been continued concern for increase in subsequent testing after coronary CTA.
Although CCTA improves detection of coronary artery disease, it is uncertain if it will bring improvement of long-term health outcomes at this point of time. Careful analysis of the previous results and further investigation will be required to validate evaluation of hard endpoints.
KeywordsCardiac Coronary CT CCTA Standard of care Emergency department
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Nam Ju Lee declares no conflict of interest. Harold Litt reports grants from Siemens Healthineers and Heartflow LLC.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Bhuiya FA, Pitts SR, McCaig LF. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008. NCHS Data Brief 2010:1–8.Google Scholar
- 2.Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). Circulation. 2002;106:1893–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bittencourt MS, Hulten EA, Murthy VL, et al. Clinical outcomes after evaluation of stable chest pain by coronary computed tomographic angiography versus usual care: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; Apr;9(4):e004419. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e139–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation. 2007;115:1762–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, Peacock WF, et al. 2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging in emergency department patients with chest pain: a joint document of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology Appropriate use Criteria Task Force. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:e1–e29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.•• Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, Peacock WF, et al. 2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS Appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging in emergency department patients with chest pain: a joint document of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:853–79. This publication presents new appropriate use criteria for imaging of emergency department chest pain patients.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Roe MT, Harrington RA, Prosper DM, et al. Clinical and therapeutic profile of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes who do not have significant coronary artery disease. The platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial investigators. Circulation. 2000;102:1101–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.• Hermann LK, Newman DH, Pleasant WA, et al. Yield of routine provocative cardiac testing among patients in an emergency department-based chest pain unit. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1128–33. This single-center retrospective analysis demonstrated low diagnostic and therapeutic yield from stress testing of emergency department chest pain patients.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Karthikeyan G, Guzic Salobir B, Jug B, et al. Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: an international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study). J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(2):507–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Uretsky S, Argulian E, Supariwala A, et al. Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(4):1267–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53.Rozanski A, Gransar H, Shaw LJ, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1622–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 56.• Hulten E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:880–92. Meta-analysis of the role of CT in evaluation of emergency department chest pain patients.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.El-Hayek G, Benjo A, Uretsky S, et al. Meta-analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography versus standard of care strategy for the evaluation of low risk chest pain: are randomized controlled trials and cohort studies showing the same evidence? Int J Cardiol. 2014;177:238–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.Truong QA, Hayden D, Woodard PK, et al. Sex differences in the effectiveness of early coronary computed tomographic angiography compared with standard emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the rule-out myocardial infarction with Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT)-II Trial. Circulation. 2013;127:2494–502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 69.Bittner DO, Mayrhofer T, Bamberg F, et al. Impact of coronary calcification on clinical management in patients with acute chest pain. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005893
- 72.Foy AJ, Liu G, Davidson WR Jr, Sciamanna C, Leslie DL. Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies in emergency department patients with chest pain: an analysis of downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:428–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar