Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cholesterol Management in the Era of PCSK9 Inhibitors

  • Public Health Policy (E Klodas, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Cholesterol management in the current era is discussed. Aggressive reduction of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol plays a key role in primary and secondary prevention of heart disease. Statins are the recommended first-line therapy in patients with hyperlipidemia; however, additional complementary approaches are frequently needed for patients who fail to reach their target LDL.

Recent Findings

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are novel drugs that provide dramatic lowering of LDL and promise outcome benefit. Despite great enthusiasm about their cardiovascular benefit, concerns have been raised regarding their cost and added value to the healthcare system. Although cost-effectiveness studies have yielded inconclusive results, analyses suggest that the current cost of PCSK9 inhibitors is disproportionately high and must be significantly reduced to add positive net benefit to healthcare system.

Summary

PCSK9 inhibitors significantly lower LDL cholesterol. Further outcome data and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to overcome the current barriers with PCSK9 inhibitors that patients, physicians, and payers face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LDL:

Low density lipoprotein

PCSK9:

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

FH:

Familial hypercholesterolemia

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

MACE:

Major adverse cardiovascular events

QALY:

Quality-adjusted life-year

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–360. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S1–45. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson JG, Stone NJ. The 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: a new paradigm supported by more evidence. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(31):2110–8. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson TA, Ito MK, Maki KC, Orringer CE, Bays HE, Jones PH, et al. National Lipid Association recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia: part 1—executive summary. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8(5):473–88. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2014.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) developed with the special contribution of the European Assocciation for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Atherosclerosis. 2016;253:281–344. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stroes ES, Thompson PD, Corsini A, Vladutiu GD, Raal FJ, Ray KK, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy-European atherosclerosis society consensus panel statement on assessment, aetiology and management. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(17):1012–22. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenson RS, Baker SK, Jacobson TA, Kopecky SL, Parker BA. The National Lipid Association's muscle safety expert P: an assessment by the statin muscle safety task force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8(3 Suppl):S58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2014.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Banach M, Rizzo M, Toth PP, Farnier M, Davidson MH, Al-Rasadi K, et al. Statin intolerance—an attempt at a unified definition: position paper from an international lipid expert panel. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(6):935–55. doi:10.1517/14740338.2015.1039980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387–97. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1410489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giugliano RP, Sabatine MS. Are PCSK9 inhibitors the next breakthrough in the cardiovascular field? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(24):2638–51. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Perak AM, Ning H, de Ferranti SD, Gooding HC, Wilkins JT, Lloyd-Jones DM. Long-term risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in US adults with the familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype. Circulation. 2016;134(1):9–19. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, Gurbel PA, Tantry U, Lin Y, et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(1):40–51. doi:10.7326/M14-2957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Wiviott SD, Raal FJ, Blom DJ, Robinson J, et al. Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(16):1500–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1500858. Evolocumab reduces LDL cholesterol by over 50% and reduces cardiac events.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koren MJ, Giugliano RP, Raal FJ, Sullivan D, Bolognese M, Langslet G, et al. Efficacy and safety of longer-term administration of evolocumab (AMG 145) in patients with hypercholesterolemia: 52-week results from the open-label study of long-term evaluation against LDL-C (OSLER) randomized trial. Circulation. 2014;129(2):234–43. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, Bergeron J, Luc G, Averna M, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(16):1489–99. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1501031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moriarty PM, Thompson PD, Cannon CP, Guyton JR, Bergeron J, Zieve FJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with a statin rechallenge arm: the ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE randomized trial. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9(6):758–69. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2015.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1615664. Evolocumab reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reinhardt U. Probing our moral values in health care: the pricing of specialty drugs. JAMA. 2015;314(10):981–2. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.9593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. • Kazi DS, Moran AE, Coxson PG, Penko J, Ollendorf DA, Pearson SD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2016;316(7):743–53. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11004. PCSK9 inhibitors are not cost-effective in heterozygous FH and in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kazi DS, Moran AE, Bibbins-Domingo K. Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy-reply. JAMA. 2016;316(20):2152. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.16292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson JL, Heidenreich PA, Barnett PG, Creager MA, Fonarow GC, Gibbons RJ, et al. ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on performance measures and task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(21):2304–22. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tice JA, Kazi DS, Pearson SD. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for treatment of high cholesterol levels: effectiveness and value. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):107–8. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. • Gandra SR, Villa G, Fonarow GC, Lothgren M, Lindgren P, Somaratne R, et al. Cost-effectiveness of LDL-C lowering with evolocumab in patients with high cardiovascular risk in the United States. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39(6):313–20. doi:10.1002/clc.22535. Evolocumab is cost-effective in heterozygous FH but not atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Villa G, Lothgren M, Kutikova L, Lindgren P, Gandra SR, Fonarow GC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in patients with high cardiovascular risk in Spain. Clin Ther. 2017;39(4):771–786 e3. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.02.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arrieta A, Page TF, Veledar E, Nasir K. Economic evaluation of PCSK9 inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular risk from health system and private payer perspectives. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169761. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169761.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mercado C, DeSimone AK, Odom E, Gillespie C, Ayala C, Loustalot F. Prevalence of cholesterol treatment eligibility and medication use among adults—United States, 2005-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(47):1305–11. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6447a1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Devries S, Agatston A, Aggarwal M, Aspry KE, Esselstyn CB, Kris-Etherton P, et al. A deficiency of nutrition education and practice in cardiology. Am J Med. 2017; doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.04.043.

  28. Baum SJ, Toth PP, Underberg JA, Jellinger P, Ross J, Wilemon K. PCSK9 inhibitor access barriers-issues and recommendations: improving the access process for patients, clinicians and payers. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40(4):243–54. doi:10.1002/clc.22713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis T, Hughes J, Estrella L. Team approach to prescribing success for PCSK9 inhibitors. Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2017;11(3):810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L. Kopecky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Anna Svatikova declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Stephen L. Kopecky reports grants from Amgen and True Health, personal fees from Prime Therapeutics, and other from Mayo Clinic P&T task force.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Public Health Policy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Svatikova, A., Kopecky, S.L. Cholesterol Management in the Era of PCSK9 Inhibitors. Curr Cardiol Rep 19, 83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-017-0891-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-017-0891-5

Keywords

Navigation