Abstract
Purpose of Review
In this review, the current literature available to patients and providers on the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer in patients with neurogenic bladder will be discussed. Topics include prostate cancer screening and diagnosis, radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy for prostate cancer, as well as surveillance.
Recent Findings
Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) patients are living longer due to better care, and cancer is becoming more frequent. This is partly due to the aging of this population, as well as intrinsic factors related to the underlying condition or urinary diversion, which poses them a greater risk of developing genitourinary malignancies. Although multiple studies have investigated this patient population, most are derived from large cohorts of spinal cord injury patients.
Summary
Many studies reported how PSA changes for different NGB patients. Few studies have investigated the management of prostate cancer, and good quality evidence for tailoring the care of this population is lacking. Although more evidence is available, improvement is still needed in using biomarkers for early diagnosis, specific screening protocols for different underlying conditions and urinary diversion, and standardized treatment recommendations based on long-term follow-up and surveillance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Hartkopp A, et al. Survival and cause of death after traumatic spinal cord injury. A long-term epidemiological survey from Denmark. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(2):76–85.
Brandes SB, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in patients with prior spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001;24(4):251–6.
Ismail S, et al. Prevalence, management, and prognosis of bladder cancer in patients with neurogenic bladder: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(4):1386–95.
Nahm LS, et al. Bladder cancer mortality after spinal cord injury over 4 decades. J Urol. 2015;193(6):1923–8.
Siegel RL, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.
Scott PA Sr, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosed in spinal cord-injured patients is more commonly advanced stage than in able-bodied patients. Urology. 2004;63(3):509–12.
Strauss DJ, et al. Trends in life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(8):1079–85.
Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Torner JC. Epidemiologic association between prostatitis and prostate cancer. Urology. 2002;60(1):78–83.
Frisbie JH, Binard J. Low prevalence of prostatic cancer among myelopathy patients. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1994;17(3):148–9.
Barbonetti A, et al. Risk of prostate cancer in men with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(6):555–60. Recent Meta-analysis of prostate cancer risk in SCI. Highlights rates of cancer detection, and characteristics of disease staging for this subset of patients. It showed a reduction in prostate cancer risk in SCI than controls.
Bauman WA, et al. Metabolic and endocrine changes in persons aging with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol. 1999;11(2):88–96.
Huang TS, et al. Impaired hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in men with spinal cord injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77(2):108–12.
Safarinejad MR. Level of injury and hormone profiles in spinal cord-injured men. Urology. 2001;58(5):671–6.
Bartoletti R, et al. Prostate growth and prevalence of prostate diseases in early onset spinal cord injuries. Eur Urol. 2009;56(1):142–8.
Hvarness H, Jakobsen H, Biering-Sorensen F. Men with spinal cord injury have a smaller prostate than men without. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(2):120–3.
Lee WY, et al. Risk of prostate and bladder cancers in patients with spinal cord injury: a population-based cohort study. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(1):51-e1-7.
Pannek J, et al. Prostate volume in male patients with spinal cord injury: a question of nerves? BJU Int. 2013;112(4):495–500.
Zermann DH, et al. Central nervous system neurons labeled following the injection of pseudorabies virus into the rat prostate gland. Prostate. 2000;44(3):240–7.
Shin YS, et al. Prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen in men with Parkinson’s disease are not different compared to age-matched control group: a prospective, case-controlled multicenter study. Prostate Int. 2015;3(2):62–4.
Bowman RM, et al. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;34(3):114–20.
Shin M, et al. Improved survival among children with spina bifida in the United States. J Pediatr. 2012;161(6):1132–7.
Johnston AW, et al. Patterns of inpatient care for prostate cancer in men with spina bifida. Disabil Health J. 2020;13(2):100866. Clinical database analysis of prostate cancer in spina bifida patients, showing the trends of care in the care of SB population (from 1998 to 2014, extracted from National Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.
Wiener JS, Frimberger DC, Wood H. Spina Bifida health-care guidelines for men’s health. Urology. 2018;116:218–26.
Eastham JA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II: principles of Active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022;208(1):19–25.
Eastham JA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I: introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022;208(1):10–8.
Eastham JA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline. Part III: Principles of radiation and future directions. J Urol. 2022;208(1):26–33.
Eastham JA, Boorjian SA, Kirkby E. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline. J Urol. 2022;208(3):505–7.
Lowrance W, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023;209(6):1082–90.
Schaeffer EM, et al. Prostate cancer, version 42023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(10):1067–96. Most recent prostate cancer guidelines for prostate cancer care according to The National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
Wei JT, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline part I: prostate cancer screening. J Urol. 2023;210(1):46–53.
Wei JT, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline part II: considerations for a prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2023;210(1):54–63.
Crawford ED, et al. Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):355–61.
Chen RC, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017;317(11):1141–50.
Gammon SR, et al. Surgical treatment for prostate cancer in patients with prior spinal cord injury. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(8):674–8.
Leach GE, et al. Post-prostatectomy incontinence: urodynamic findings and treatment outcomes. J Urol. 1996;155(4):1256–9.
Smith CP, Chancellor MB. Emerging role of botulinum toxin in the management of voiding dysfunction. J Urol. 2004;171(6 Pt 1):2128–37.
Widmark A, Fransson P, Tavelin B. Self-assessment questionnaire for evaluating urinary and intestinal late side effects after pelvic radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer compared with an age-matched control population. Cancer. 1994;74(9):2520–32.
Quek ML, et al. Combined radical prostatectomy and bladder augmentation for concomitant prostate cancer and detrusor instability. Urology. 2005;65(5):964–7.
Harper ME, Pierrepoint CG, Griffiths K. Carcinoma of the prostate: relationship of pretreatment hormone levels to survival. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1984;20(4):477–82.
Ribeiro M, Ruff P, Falkson G. Low serum testosterone and a younger age predict for a poor outcome in metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997;20(6):605–8.
National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013:36(1):1-2. https://doi.org/10.1179/1079026813Z.000000000136. Most updated statistics for SCI patients in the US, with median age of presentation, overall survival. This data sheet is a quick reference on demographic and condition status for 36,275 person with tSCI collected through 2022 by 31 federally funded SCI Model Systems
Funding
No funding was received for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MB wrote the main manuscript text. KR provided the outline for the manuscript and the relevance of each topic. MB and KR reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bigarella, M.P., Richards, K.A. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment for Patients with Neurogenic Bladder: Does the Literature Support a Different Approach?. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-024-00746-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-024-00746-6