Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal Management of Neurogenic Bladder due to Spinal Cord Injury in Pediatric Patients

  • Neurogenic Bladder (C Powell, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Spinal cord injuries are a well-known cause of neurogenic bladder in children. The aim of this review is to bring the reader up to date on the management of neurogenic bladder in patients with spinal cord injuries.

Recent Findings

After spinal shock resolution, the most common treatments are anticholinergic medications and intermittent catheterization. Alpha-adrenergic blockers and beta-agonists are the other available medical therapies. Nonetheless, surgery is an alternative when medical treatment alone fails. Slings and urinary sphincters aim to increase bladder outlet resistance, while bladder augmentations increase continence and promote safe storage pressures.

Summary

Initially, spinal cord injuries cause spinal shock and bladder atony. For this reason, acute management involves adequate bladder emptying with catheterization. Catheterization is essential to protect renal function during the spinal shock phase. Similarly, long-term management also focuses on protecting renal function. However, long-term management should also aim to optimize bladder capacity and pressure, achieve continence, and prevent complications. Several medical and surgical management options are safe and effective for treating neurogenic bladder. Improving the quality of life and considering patient preferences are essential components to treating neurogenic bladder in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Ginsberg DA, Boone TB, Cameron AP, Gousse A, Kaufman MR, Keays E, et al. The AUA/SUFU guideline on adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: diagnosis and evaluation. J Urol NLM (Medline). 2021;206:1097–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer SB. Neurogenic bladder: etiology and assessment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23:541–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain NB, Ayers GD, Peterson EN, Harris MB, Morse L, O KC, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States. The Journal of the American Medical Association [Internet]. 2015;313:2236–43. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/

  4. Chen Y, Tang Y, Vogel LC, DeVivo MJ. Causes of spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil [Internet]. 2013;19:1–8. Available from: https://www.thomasland.com

  5. Parent S, Mac-Thiong J-M, Roy-Beaudry M, Sosa JF, Labelle H. Spinal cord injury in the pediatric population: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:1515–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ginsberg D. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of neurogenic bladder. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19.

  7. Ziu E, Mesfin FB. Spinal Shock - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf [Internet]. Spinal Shock. 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448163/

  8. Welk B, Schneider MP, Thavaseelan J, Traini LR, Curt A, Kessler TM. Early urological care of patients with spinal cord injury. World J Urol Springer Verlag. 2018;36:1537–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lucas E. Medical management of neurogenic bladder for children and adults: a review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil [Internet]. 2019;25:195–204. Available from: https://www.thomasland.com

  10. Eswara JR, Castellan M, González R, Mendieta N, Cendron M. The urological management of children with spinal cord injury. World Journal of Urology Springer Verlag. 2018;36:1593–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koff SA. Estimating bladder capacity in children. Urology. 1983;21:248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nijman RJM. Urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract. Pediatric Urology. Elsevier; 2010. p. 127–40.

  13. Cheol Shin J, Lee Y, Yang H, Hyun Kim D. Clinical significance of urodynamic study parameters in maintenance of renal function in spinal cord injury patients. 2014; Available from: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.353

  14. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol. 1981;126:205–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson DA, Prince JR. MR Imaging determination of the location of the normal conus medullaris throughout childhood. Am J Neuroradiol. 1989;10:259–62.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Samson G, Cardenas DD. Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007;18:255–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Welk B, Lenherr S, Elliott S, Stoffel J, Presson AP, Zhang C, et al. The Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS): a secondary assessment of its validity, reliability among people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord [Internet]. 2018;56:259–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-017-0028-0

  18. Sturm RM, Cheng EY. The management of the pediatric neurogenic bladder. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2016;11:225–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Abrams P, Agarwal M, Drake M, El-Masri W, Fulford S, Reid S, et al. A proposed guideline for the urological management of patients with spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2008;101:989–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander MA, Matthews DJ. Pediatric rehabilitation: principles and practice [Internet]. 5th ed. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2015 [cited 2022 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.demosmedical.com

  21. Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000;163:768–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Generao SE, Dall’Era JP, Stone AR, Kurzrock EA. Spinal cord injury in children: long-term urodynamic and urological outcomes. Journal of Urology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004;172:1092–4. Retrospectively reviewed pediatric cases of SCI and identified age of injury, mechanism of injury and bladder management strategy.

  23. Schottler J, Vogel LC, Sturm P. Spinal cord injuries in young children: a review of children injured at 5 years of age and younger. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:1138–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chao R, Mayo ME. Long-term urodynamic follow up in pediatric spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1994;32:806–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fortin A, Morin V, Ramsay S, Gervais P, Bolduc S, Frcsc MD. Adherence to antimuscarinics in children with overactive bladder. 2017;255–8. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/pch/article/22/5/255/3829186

  26. Noh JW, Lee B, Kim JH. Efficacy and safety of anticholinergics for children or adolescents with idiopathic overactive bladder: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol [Internet]. Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 [cited 2022 Jun 28];51:1459–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31243632/

  27. Veenboer PW, Huisman J, Chrzan RJ, Kuijper CF, Dik P, de Kort LMO, et al. Behavioral effects of long-term antimuscarinic use in patients with spinal dysraphism: a case control study. J Urol. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;190:2228–32.

  28. Wöllner J, Pannek J. Initial experience with the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity with a new beta-3 agonist (mirabegron) in patients with spinal cord injury. International Spinal Cord Society [Internet]. 2016;54:78–82. Available from: https://www.nature.com/sc

  29. Blais A-S, Nadeau G, Moore K, Genois L, Bolduc S. Prospective pilot study of mirabegron in pediatric patients with overactive bladder. Eur Urol. 2016;70:9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kareem DA, Hassan OA. The role of alpha blockers in the treatment of children with voiding dysfunction. Iraqui Postgrad Med J. 2016;15.

  31. al Taweel W, Seyam R. Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. Research and Reports in Urology [Internet]. 2015;7–85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S29644

  32. Holmes NM, Kogan BA, Baskin LS. Placement of artificial urinary sphincter in children and simultaneous gastrocystoplasty. The Journal of Urology. 2001;2366–8.

  33. Li G-P, Wang X-Y, Zhang Y. Efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity caused by spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22:275–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Schurch B, Schulte-Baukloh H. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of neurogenic bladder in adults and children. Eur Urol Suppl. 2006;5:679–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Akbar M, Abel R, Seyler TM, Gerner HJ, Möhring K. Repeated botulinum-A toxin injections in the treatment of myelodysplastic children and patients with spinal cord injuries with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. BJU Int. 2007;100:639–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Greer T, Abbott J, Breytenbach W, McGuane D, Barker A, Khosa J, et al. Ten years of experience with intravesical and intrasphincteric onabotulinumtoxinA in children. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2016;12:94.e1–94.e6. Demonstrated that intravesical Botox remained effective in response quality and response time in children up to an eleventh injection.

  37. Bennett CJ, Bennett JK. Augmentation cystoplasty and urinary diversion in patients with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1993;4:377–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rhee AC, Yerkes EB, Rink RC. Incontinent and continent urinary diversion. Pediatric Surgery. Mosby; 2012;1487–96.

  39. Gurung PMS, Attar KH, Abdul-Rahman A, Morris T, Hamid R, Julian P, et al. Long-term outcomes of augmentation ileocystoplasty in patients with spinal cord injury: a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. BJU Int. 2012;109:1236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mills RD, Studer UE. Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. J Urol. 1999;161:1057–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Maldonado N, Michel J, Barnes K. Thirty-day hospital readmissions after augmentation cystoplasty: a nationwide readmissions database analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14:533.e1–533.e9. Maldonado et al. determined the rate, causes, risk factors, and costs associated with 30-day readmissions for children undergoing augmentation cystoplasty.

  42. Husmann DA. Long-term complications following bladder augmentations in patients with spina bifida: bladder calculi, perforation of the augmented bladder and upper tract deterioration. Transl Androl Urol [Internet]. AME Publications; 2016 [cited 2022 Jun 30];5:3. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4739984/

  43. Best KL, Ethans K, Craven BC, Noreau L, Hitzig SL. Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for neurogenic bladder function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. https://doi.org/101080/1079026820161226700 [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2016 [cited 2022 Jun 30];40:505–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2016.1226700

  44. Hwang M, Zebracki K, Lawrence VC, Mulcahey MJ, Varni JW. Development of the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM Spinal Cord Injury (PedsQLTM SCI) module: qualitative methods. Spinal Cord [Internet]. 2020;58:1134–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0450-6

  45. Garma SI, Kelly EH, Daharsh EZ, Vogel LC. Health-related quality of life after pediatric spinal cord injury. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jpepsy/article/36/2/226/890960

  46. Shalaby MS, Gibson A, Granitsiotis P, Conn G, Cascio S. Assessment of the introduction of an adolescent transition urology clinic using a validated questionnaire. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11:89.e1–89.e5. Reported that the transition of adolescents with complex urological conditions to adult urology clinic is beneficial in addressing the patients’ needs.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Suite 4230, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA

    Nestor F. Suria Cordero, Ashley W. Johnston & Pankaj P. Dangle

Authors
  1. Nestor F. Suria Cordero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashley W. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pankaj P. Dangle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj P. Dangle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical collection on Neurogenic Bladder

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suria Cordero, N.F., Johnston, A.W. & Dangle, P.P. Optimal Management of Neurogenic Bladder due to Spinal Cord Injury in Pediatric Patients. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 18, 71–77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-022-00681-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-022-00681-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation