Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How the Smartphone Is Changing Allergy Diagnostics

  • Immunologic/Diagnostic Tests in Allergy (P Matricardi, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Evidence-based clinical diagnosis of allergic disorders is increasingly challenging. Clinical decision support systems implemented in mobile applications (apps) are being developed to assist clinicians in diagnostic decisions at the point of care. We reviewed apps for allergic diseases general diagnosis, diagnostic refinement and diagnostic personalisation. Apps designed for specific medical devices are not addressed.

Recent Findings

Apps with potential usefulness in the initial diagnosis and diagnostic refinement of respiratory, food, skin and drug allergies are described. Apps to support diagnostic personalisation are not yet available. There is an urgent need to increase the scientific evidence on the real usefulness of these apps, as well as to develop new scientifically grounded apps designed and validated to support all allergic diseases and diagnostic levels.

Summary

Apps have the potential to change the diagnosis of allergic diseases becoming part of the routine diagnostics toolset, but its usefulness needs to be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Scott IA. Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies. BMJ. 2009;338:b1860. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johansson S. New nomenclature and clinical aspects of allergic diseases. In: Pawankar R, Holgate S, Rosenwasser LJ, editors. Allergy Frontiers: Classification and Pathomechanisms. vol Allergy Frontiers (2nd). Tokyo: Springer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johansson SG, Hourihane JO, Bousquet J, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Dreborg S, Haahtela T, et al. A revised nomenclature for allergy. An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. Allergy. 2001;56(9):813–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: report of the nomenclature review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(5):832–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. • Tanno LK, Calderon MA, Smith HE, Sanchez-Borges M, Sheikh A, Demoly P, et al. Dissemination of definitions and concepts of allergic and hypersensitivity conditions. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-016-0115-2 This review provides an update on the current definitions and concepts concerning allergic disorders, focusing its implementation in ICD-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. • Ring J, Marek J, Papadopoulos N, Pfaar O, Akdis C. Provocative proposal for a revised nomenclature for allergy and other hypersensitivity diseases. Allergy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13561 The authors propose a revised nomenclature for allergy and suggest it as a basis for discussion and improvement of allergy speciality.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddel HK, Bateman ED, Becker A, Boulet L-P, Cruz AA, Drazen JM, et al. A summary of the new GINA strategy: a roadmap to asthma control. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(3):622–39. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00853-2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bateman ED, Hurd SS, Barnes PJ, Bousquet J, Drazen JM, FitzGerald JM, et al. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J. 2008;31(1):143–78. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00138707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wise J. Use clinical tests to diagnose asthma and to avoid overdiagnosis, says NICE. BMJ. 2015;350:h522. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. NICE. Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management. 2017. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng80. Accessed 20-06-2018.

  11. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. 2018. www.ginasthma.org. Accessed 15-06-2018.

  12. Jacobs TS, Forno E, Brehm JM, Acosta-Perez E, Han YY, Blatter J, et al. Underdiagnosis of allergic rhinitis in underserved children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(3):737–9 e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Huisstede A, Castro Cabezas M, van de Geijn GJ, Mannaerts GH, Njo TL, Taube C, et al. Underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of asthma in the morbidly obese. Respir Med. 2013;107(9):1356–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2013.05.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez-Garcia M, Caballero A, Jaramillo C, Maldonado D, Torres-Duque CA. Prevalence, risk factors and underdiagnosis of asthma and wheezing in adults 40 years and older: a population-based study. J Asthma. 2015;52(8):823–30. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1010733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sclar DA, Lieberman PL. Anaphylaxis: underdiagnosed, underreported, and undertreated. Am J Med. 2014;127(1 Suppl):S1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sussman G, Abuzakouk M, Berard F, Canonica W, Oude Elberink H, Gimenez-Arnau A, et al. Angioedema in chronic spontaneous urticaria is underdiagnosed and has a substantial impact: analyses from ASSURE-CSU. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1724–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Aaron SD, Vandemheen KL, FitzGerald JM, Ainslie M, Gupta S, Lemiere C, et al. Reevaluation of diagnosis in adults with physician-diagnosed asthma. JAMA. 2017;317(3):269–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleischer DM, Bock SA, Spears GC, Wilson CG, Miyazawa NK, Gleason MC, et al. Oral food challenges in children with a diagnosis of food allergy. J Pediatr. 2011;158(4):578–83 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.09.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rebelo Gomes E, Fonseca J, Araujo L, Demoly P. Drug allergy claims in children: from self-reporting to confirmed diagnosis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(1):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02870.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morais-Almeida M, Santos N, Pereira AM, Branco-Ferreira M, Nunes C, Bousquet J, et al. Prevalence and classification of rhinitis in preschool children in Portugal: a nationwide study. Allergy. 2013;68(10):1278–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gronhoj Larsen C, Gyldenlove M, Linneberg A. Allergic rhinitis is often undiagnosed and untreated: results from a general population study of Danish adults. Clin Respir J. 2013;7(4):354–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Esteban CA, Klein RB, Kopel SJ, McQuaid EL, Fritz GK, Seifer R, et al. Underdiagnosed and undertreated allergic rhinitis in urban school-aged children with asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2014;27(2):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1089/ped.2014.0344.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Brozek JL, Bousquet J, Agache I, Agarwal A, Bachert C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines—2016 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(4):950–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cvetkovski B, Kritikos V, Yan K, Bosnic-Anticevich S. Tell me about your hay fever: a qualitative investigation of allergic rhinitis management from the perspective of the patient. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018;28(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-018-0071-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Matricardi PM, Kleine-Tebbe J, Hoffmann HJ, Valenta R, Hilger C, Hofmaier S, et al. EAACI molecular allergology user’s guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016;27(Suppl 23):1–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Papadopoulos NG, Bernstein JA, Demoly P, Dykewicz M, Fokkens W, Hellings PW, et al. Phenotypes and endotypes of rhinitis and their impact on management: a PRACTALL report. Allergy. 2015;70(5):474–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hekking PP, Bel EH. Developing and emerging clinical asthma phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014;2(6):671–80; quiz 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2014.09.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jimenez-Rodriguez TW, Garcia-Neuer M, Alenazy LA, Castells M. Anaphylaxis in the 21st century: phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers. J Asthma Allergy. 2018;11:121–42. https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S159411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cicardi M, Aberer W, Banerji A, Bas M, Bernstein JA, Bork K, et al. Classification, diagnosis, and approach to treatment for angioedema: consensus report from the hereditary angioedema international working group. Allergy. 2014;69(5):602–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Deschildre A, Lejeune S, Cap M, Flammarion S, Jouannic L, Amat F, et al. Food allergy phenotypes: the key to personalized therapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017;47(9):1125–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Amaral R, Fonseca JA, Jacinto T, Pereira AM, Malinovschi A, Janson C, et al. Having concomitant asthma phenotypes is common and independently relates to poor lung function in NHANES 2007-2012. Clin Transl Allergy. 2018;8:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0201-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bourdin A, Chanez P. Clustering in asthma: why, how and for how long? Eur Respir J. 2013;41(6):1247–8. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00003313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Deliu M, Sperrin M, Belgrave D, Custovic A. Identification of asthma subtypes using clustering methodologies. Pulm Ther. 2016;2:19–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-016-0017-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fingleton J, Hardy J, Beasley R. Treatable traits of chronic airways disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018;24(1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bousquet PJ, Devillier P, Tadmouri A, Mesbah K, Demoly P, Bousquet J. Clinical relevance of cluster analysis in phenotyping allergic rhinitis in a real-life study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;166(3):231–40. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(21):2217–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009;84(8):1022–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kasper D, Fauci A, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson JL, J. L. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 19th ed. 2015.

  39. Das N, Topalovic M, Janssens W. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of obstructive lung disease: current status and future potential. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018;24(2):117–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loh BCS, Then PHH. Deep learning for cardiac computer-aided diagnosis: benefits, issues & solutions. mHealth. 2017;3:45. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2017.09.01.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. 4th ed. London: Springer Science & Business Media; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Scott I. What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care? Intern Med J. 2009;39(6):389–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01798.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. American Medical Association. Digital Health study physicians’ motivations and requirements for adopting digital clinical tools. 2016. https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/default/files/media-browser/specialty%20group/washington/ama-digital-health-report923.pdf. Accessed 20-06-2018.

  45. Jabez Christopher J, Khanna Nehemiah H, Kannan A. A clinical decision support system for diagnosis of allergic rhinitis based on intradermal skin tests. Comput Biol Med. 2015;65:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.07.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, Brakel TM, Wubs M, Skidmore B, Kocks JWH, Oude Elberink JNG, et al. The feasibility of an allergy management support system (AMSS) for IgE-mediated allergy in primary care. Clin Transl Allergy. 2018;8(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0206-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jacinto T. A decision support system for exhaled nitric oxide values—model and evaluation. Porto: University of Porto; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Christopher JJ, Nehemiah HK, Arputharaj K, Moses GL. Computer-assisted medical decision-making system for diagnosis of urticaria. MDM Policy Pract. 2016;1(1):238146831667775. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468316677752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Otto AK, Dyer AA, Warren CM, Walkner M, Smith BM, Gupta RS. The development of a clinical decision support system for the management of pediatric food allergy. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017;56(6):571–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922816669097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Courbis AL, Murray R, Arnavielhe S, Caimmi D, Bedbrook A, Van Eerd M, et al. Electronic clinical decision support system for allergic rhinitis management. Clin Exp Allergy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13230.

  51. Pew Research Center. Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies. 2016. http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2016/02/pew_research_center_global_technology_report_final_february_22__2016.pdf. Accessed 15-06-2018.

  52. • Mobasheri MH, King D, Johnston M, Gautama S, Purkayastha S, Darzi A. The ownership and clinical use of smartphones by doctors and nurses in the UK: a multicentre survey study. BMJ Innov. 2015;1(4):174–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000062 Cross-sectional survey, at a large London-based NHS Trust, showing that almost all doctors owned a smartphone and that around 90% of medical apps owners used them as part of their clinical practice.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cuervo-Pardo L, Barcena-Blanch MA, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Schroer B. Apps for food allergy: a critical assessment. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3(6):980–1 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2015.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. • Huckvale K, Morrison C, Ouyang J, Ghaghda A, Car J. The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0303-x Systematic review on apps providing asthma self-management information and tools demonstrating that between 2011 and 2013 the number of asthma apps more than doubled (93 to 191), but apps containing diagnostic or assessment functions remained low 10% (6 to 15).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Instantly diagnose and manage respiratory disease using only a smartphone. ResApp Health Limited. 2018. https://www.resapphealth.com.au/. Accessed 04-07-2018.

  56. Moschovis PP. Diagnosing Respiratory Disease in Children Using Cough Sounds 2 (SMARTCOUGH-C-2). NCT03392363. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2018. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03392363. Accessed 15-06-2018.

  57. Ithnin M, Mohd Rani MD, Abd Latif Z, Kani P, Syaiful A, Nor Aripin KN, et al. Mobile app design, development, and publication for adverse drug reaction assessments of causality, severity, and preventability. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(5):e78. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Gallagher RM, Kirkham JJ, Mason JR, Bird KA, Williamson PR, Nunn AJ, et al. Development and inter-rater reliability of the Liverpool adverse drug reaction causality assessment tool. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ithnin MT, Mohd T, Abd Latif Z, Dzulkhairi Mohd Rani M, Kani P, Syaiful A, et al. Mobile Applications (Apps) For Assessment of Adverse Drugs Reactions (ADRs): Causality, Severity and Preventability Assessment. Malay J Pharm Sci. 2016;13(1):80.

    Google Scholar 

  60. • Blumenthal KG, Wickner PG, Hurwitz S, Pricco N, Nee AE, Laskowski K, et al. Tackling inpatient penicillin allergies: assessing tools for antimicrobial stewardship. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(1):154–61.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.005 The use of a computerized CDSS to stratify risk of true penicillin allergy improved antibiotic choice among medical inpatients reporting prior penicillin allergy.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Blumenthal KG, Shenoy ES, Varughese CA, Hurwitz S, Hooper DC, Banerji A. Impact of a clinical guideline for prescribing antibiotics to inpatients reporting penicillin or cephalosporin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115(4):294–300 e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Nogueira-Silva L, Martins SV, Cruz-Correia R, Azevedo LF, Morais-Almeida M, Bugalho-Almeida A, et al. Control of allergic rhinitis and asthma test—a formal approach to the development of a measuring tool. Respir Res. 2009;10:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Jácome C, Almeida R, Teixeira J, Vieira-Marques P, Vilaça R, Fernandes J, et al. Inspirers: An app to measure and improve adherence to inhaled treatment. In: Macedo M, editor. Proceedings of the International Conference e-Health: Lisboa; 2017. p. 135–9.

  64. Jácome C, Guedes R, Almeida R, Teixeira JF, Pinho B, Vieira-Marques P, et al. mINSPIRERS—Estudo da exequibilidade de uma aplicação móvel para medição e melhoria da adesão à medicação inalada de controlo em adolescentes e adultos com asma persistente. Protocolo de um estudo observacional multicêntrico [mINSPIRERS—Feasibility of a mobile application to measure and improve adherence to inhaled controller medications among adolescents and adults with persistent asthma. Protocol for a multicentre observational study]. Rev Port Imunoalergologia. 2018;26:47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Ferrie PJ. Interpretation of rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire data. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;98(4):843–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70135-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. • Cingi C, Yorgancioglu A, Cingi CC, Oguzulgen K, Muluk NB, Ulusoy S, et al. The “physician on call patient engagement trial” (POPET): measuring the impact of a mobile patient engagement application on health outcomes and quality of life in allergic rhinitis and asthma patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(6):487–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21468 This trial with 327 patients with allergic rhinitis or asthma showed that the POPET app can have a significant impact on disease control and quality of life.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bousquet J, Arnavielhe S, Bedbrook A, Fonseca J, Morais Almeida M, Todo Bom A, et al. The allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) score of allergic rhinitis using mobile technology correlates with quality of life: the MASK study. Allergy. 2018;73(2):505–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Caimmi D, Baiz N, Tanno LK, Demoly P, Arnavielhe S, Murray R, et al. Validation of the MASK-rhinitis visual analogue scale on smartphone screens to assess allergic rhinitis control. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017;47(12):1526–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. • Samreth D, Arnavielhe S, Ingenrieth F, Bedbrook A, Onorato GL, Murray R, et al. Geolocation with respect to personal privacy for the Allergy Diary app—a MASK study. World Allergy Organ J. 2018;11(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-018-0194-3 First study concerned with geolocation anonymization methods for health apps, showing that k-anonymity is an acceptable method for data privacy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. • Bousquet J, Devillier P, Anto JM, Bewick M, Haahtela T, Arnavielhe S, et al. Daily allergic multimorbidity in rhinitis using mobile technology: a novel concept of the MASK study. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1622–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13448 Uses an innovative investigatory approach with mobile technology to facilitate and more precisely characterize allergic multimorbidity, including a new phenotype description.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. • Bianchi A, Tsilochristou O, Gabrielli F, Tripodi S, Matricardi PM. The smartphone: a novel diagnostic tool in pollen allergy? J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26(3):204–7. https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.0060 Pilot description on how the smartphone can be used to refine diagnosis in pollen allergic patients.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Florack J, Brighetti MA, Perna S, Pizzulli A, Pizzulli A, Tripodi S, et al. Comparison of six disease severity scores for allergic rhinitis against pollen counts a prospective analysis at population and individual level. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016;27(4):382–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pizzulli A, Perna S, Florack J, Pizzulli A, Giordani P, Tripodi S, et al. The impact of telemonitoring on adherence to nasal corticosteroid treatment in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(10):1246–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Costa C, Menesatti P, Brighetti MA, Travaglini A, Rimatori V, Di Rienzo BA, et al. Pilot study on the short-term prediction of symptoms in children with hay fever monitored with e-Health technology. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;46(6):216–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. AIT2020. Welcome to AIT2020: an observational longitudinal multicenter clinical study. 2017. http://www.ait2020.com/. Accessed 01-07-2018.

  77. Vourc'h-Jourdain M, Barbarot S, Taieb A, Diepgen T, Ambonati M, Durosier V, et al. Patient-oriented SCORAD: a self-assessment score in atopic dermatitis. A preliminary feasibility study. Dermatology. 2009;218(3):246–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000193997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Stalder JF, Barbarot S, Wollenberg A, Holm EA, De Raeve L, Seidenari S, et al. Patient-oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD): a new self-assessment scale in atopic dermatitis validated in Europe. Allergy. 2011;66(8):1114–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02577.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Kunz B, Oranje AP, Labreze L, Stalder JF, Ring J, Taieb A. Clinical validation and guidelines for the SCORAD index: consensus report of the European task force on atopic dermatitis. Dermatology. 1997;195(1):10–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000245677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Leshem YA, Hajar T, Hanifin JM, Simpson EL. What the eczema area and severity index score tells us about the severity of atopic dermatitis: an interpretability study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1353–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Barbier N, Paul C, Luger T, Allen R, De Prost Y, Papp K, et al. Validation of the eczema area and severity Index for atopic dermatitis in a cohort of 1550 patients from the pimecrolimus cream 1% randomized controlled clinical trials programme. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150(1):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05696.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Schmitt J, Spuls PI, Thomas KS, Simpson E, Furue M, Deckert S, et al. The harmonising outcome measures for eczema (HOME) statement to assess clinical signs of atopic eczema in trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(4):800–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Weller K, Groffik A, Church MK, Hawro T, Krause K, Metz M, et al. Development and validation of the Urticaria Control Test: a patient-reported outcome instrument for assessing urticaria control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(5):1365–72, 72 e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.12.1076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hollis K, Proctor C, McBride D, Balp MM, McLeod L, Hunter S, et al. Comparison of urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) values obtained from once-daily and twice-daily versions: results from the ASSURE-CSU study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(2):267–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-017-0331-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Weller K, Groffik A, Magerl M, Tohme N, Martus P, Krause K, et al. Development, validation, and initial results of the angioedema activity score. Allergy. 2013;68(9):1185–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. • Tignor N, Wang P, Genes N, Rogers L, Hershman SG, Scott ER, et al. Methods for clustering time series data acquired from mobile health apps. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2017;22:300–11. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813207813_0029 Describes an innovative approach to the challenges of clustering time series data collected from mobile health apps in which there is a high proportion of missing data.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Yii ACA, Tay TR, Choo XN, Koh MSY, Tee AKH, Wang DY. Precision medicine in united airways disease: a “treatable traits” approach. Allergy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Agusti A, Bel E, Thomas M, Vogelmeier C, Brusselle G, Holgate S, et al. Treatable traits: toward precision medicine of chronic airway diseases. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):410–9. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01359-2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

During the conduct of the work, the authors were supported by ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) through the operation POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029130 (“mINSPIRERS—mHealth para medição e melhoria da adesão à medicação nas doenças respiratórias obstrutivas crónicas—generalização e avaliação de tecnologias de gamificação, suporte por pares e processamento avançado de imagem”) funded by the Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização—COMPETE2020 and by National Funds through FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia); and by NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-033275 (AIRDOC - “Aplicação móvel Inteligente para suporte individualizado e monitorização da função e sons Respiratórios de Doentes Obstrutivos Crónicos ”) by NORTE 2020 (Programa Operacional Regional do Norte).

Cristina Jácome has a post-doctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/115169/2016) funded by FCT, co-financed by the European Social Fund (POCH) and Portuguese national funds from MCTES (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior).

Rute Almeida has a post-doctoral grant from Project NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000016 (NanoSTIMA) funded by North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, and through ERDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Almeida Fonseca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Ana Margarida Pereira and João Fonseca are investigators in studies with InspirerMundi, Allergy Diary and AllergyMonitor. Cristina Jácome is an investigator in studies with InspirerMundi. Rute Almeida is an investigator in studies with InspirerMundi and Allergy Diary.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Immunologic/Diagnostic Tests in Allergy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira, A.M., Jácome, C., Almeida, R. et al. How the Smartphone Is Changing Allergy Diagnostics. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 18, 69 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-018-0824-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-018-0824-4

Keywords

Navigation