Skip to main content
Log in

Ozone: a critical contaminant produced during gas metal arc welding (GMAW) on aluminum alloys—resolving the short- versus long-duration sampling discrepancy

  • Published:
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ozone is one of the gases produced during argon-shielded arc welding on aluminum alloys. Arc welding superimposes multiple episodes of intense emission of short duration onto the background level during the work shift. Short-duration exposures during welding were measured using colorimetric detector tubes and long-duration exposures, by colorimetric badges utilizing similar chemistry. Both devices were positioned on the lapel in the breathing zone. Many of the short-duration samples exceeded the 8-h TLV–TWA (threshold limit value–time-weighted average) of 0.08 ppm for moderate work during argon-shielded gas metal arc welding (GMAW) also known as metal inert gas (MIG) welding. Some short-duration samples exceeded the transient limit of 0.24 ppm (3× the TLV–TWA), and several exceeded the maximum of 0.40 ppm (5× the TLV–TWA). Exceedance of the maximum in jurisdictions using TLVs as exposure limits necessitates control measures including effective local exhaust ventilation and respiratory protection. Ozone was undetectable (< 0.04 ppm) during gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) also known as tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding. During long-duration sampling, almost all levels during GMAW were ≤ 0.08 ppm h (≤ 0.01 ppm averaged over 8 h), the limit of detection of the sampling device. As a result, ozone is a critical gaseous contaminant (requiring control measures) during GMAW (MIG welding). Protection of the eyes against irritation in sensitive individuals dominates other considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 3M (Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing) (2009) 2009 Respirator selection guide. 3M, Occupational Health and Environmental Safety Division, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) (2001) Ozone. In Documentation of the TLVs7 and BEIs7. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, [CD-ROM]

  • ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) (2018) TLVs and BEIs for chemical substances and physical agents & biological exposure indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Althouse AD, Turnquist CH, Bowditch WA, Bowditch KE (1988) Modern welding. Goodheart-Willock Company, Inc., South Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger N (2004) NIOSH respirator selection logic (DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-100). Department of Health and Human Services (US), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • CSA Group (2011) Certification of companies for fusion welding of aluminum (CAN/CSA W47.2-11). CSA Group, Mississauga

    Google Scholar 

  • Dräger (2011) Dräger—tubes & CMS—handbook. Dräger Safety, Lubeck

    Google Scholar 

  • Goller JW, Paik NW (1985) A comparison of iron oxide fume inside and outside of welding helmets. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 46:89–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leidel NA, Busch KA, Lynch JR (1977) Occupational exposure sampling manual (DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 77-173). Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (US), Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus TN, Haddad AN (2013) UV and blue light exposures in an aluminum shipbuilding environment. Int J Open Scient Res 1(6):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus TN, Haddad AN (2014) Use of methanol as a coolant during machining of aluminum in a shipbuilding environment: a failure to assess and manage risk. Adv Mater Res 955-959:1061–1064. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.955-959.1061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McManus N, Haddad AN (2015a) Oxygen levels during welding assessment in an aluminum shipbuilding environment. Prof Saf 60(7):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus N, Haddad AN (2015b) Argon-related fatigue: an investigation in an aluminum shipbuilding environment. Prof Saf 60(10):47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus TN, Haddad AN (2016) Chromium emissions during welding in an aluminum shipbuilding environment. Weld J 95(03):86-s–92-s

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphix Technologies (2017) ChromAir System. Operating instructions for ozone monitor (Part Number 380010). Morphix Technologies, Virginia Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) (1988) Criteria for a recommended standard, welding, brazing, and thermal cutting (DHHS (NIOSH) publication no. 88–110). Department of Health and Human Services (US), Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) (2007) NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards (DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-149, August 2006 with minor technical changes, September 2007, with minor technical changes). Department of Health and Human Services (US), Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid N, Yap D, Bloxam R (2008) The potential role of background ozone on current and emerging air issues: an overview. Air Qual Atmos Health 1:19–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics—from air pollution to climate change. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thermo Electron (2004) Model 42C, chemiluminescence NO-NO2-NOx analyzer. Thermo Electron Corporation, Franklin

    Google Scholar 

  • White WH (2009) Considerations in the use of ozone and PM2.5 data for exposure assessment. Air Qual Atmos Health 2:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is financially supported by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), Brasilia, DF, Brasil and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), formerly Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas, Brasilia, DF, Brasil (the Brazililian National Research Council).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Neil McManus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McManus, T.N., Haddad, A.N. Ozone: a critical contaminant produced during gas metal arc welding (GMAW) on aluminum alloys—resolving the short- versus long-duration sampling discrepancy. Air Qual Atmos Health 12, 97–106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0634-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0634-9

Keywords

Navigation