Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 549–558 | Cite as

Life cycle assessment and greenhouse gas emission evaluation from Aksaray solid waste disposal facility

  • Afşın Yusuf Çetinkaya
  • Levent Bilgili
  • S. Levent Kuzu
Article
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a popular tool used to assess the environmental performance of municipal solid waste (MSW) management systems. In this study, LCA method was used to determine the best municipal solid waste management strategy for Aksaray city, Turkey. Four different scenarios were developed as an alternative to the existing waste management system and evaluated for the best environmental solution. The scenario with 75% landfilling–25% composting provided the best results in terms of human health and environmental impact. Current emissions from the present MSW facility were estimated for methane and carbon dioxide emissions. Annual emissions in 2017 were 8674 and 3161 t year−1 for CO2 and CH4, respectively. The estimated ground-level concentrations of these emissions were 30 and 50 μg m−3 for CO2 and CH4, respectively. Both modeled CO2 and CH4 concentrations were expressed as CO2(eq). The total radiative forcing was calculated as 0.021 W m−2.

Keywords

LCA SimaPro Municipal solid waste management Aksaray Turkey Greenhouse gas emissions 

References

  1. Agacayak T, Kindap T, Unal A, Pozzoli L, Mallet M, Solmon F (2015) A case study for Saharan dust transport over Turkey via RegCM4.1 model. Atmos Res 153:392–403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alver A, Altaş L (2013) Landfill leachate characterization of Aksaray Province and electrochemical treatability. Journal of Selcuk University Natural and Applied Science 2:665–680Google Scholar
  3. Banar M, Cokaygil Z, Ozkan A (2009) Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. Waste Manag 29:54–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogner J, Pipatti R, Hashimoto S, Diaz C, Mareckova K, Diaz L, Kjeldsen P, Monni S, Faaij A, Gao Q, Zhang T, Ahmed MA, Sutamihardja RT, Gregory R (2008) Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Waste Manag Res 26:11–32.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07088433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Damgaard A, Riber C, Fruergaard T, Hulgaard T, Christensen TH (2010) Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration. Waste Manag 30:1244–1250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devleesschauwer B, Havelaar AH, Noordhout CM, Haagsma JA, Praet N, Dorny P, Duchateau L, Torgerson PR, Oyen H, Speybroeck N (2014) Calculating disability-adjusted life years to quantify burden of disease. Int J Public Health 59:565–569.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0552-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghose A, Pizzol M, McLaren SJ (2017) Consequential LCA modelling of building refurbishment in New Zealand—an evaluation of resource and waste management scenarios. J Clean Prod 165:119–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilardino A, Rojas J, Mattos H, Larrea-Gallegos G, Vazquez-Rowe I (2017) Combining operational research and life cycle assessment to optimize municipal solid waste collection in a district in lima (Peru). J Clean Prod 156:589–603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gollapalli M, Kota SH (2018) Methane emissions from a landfill in north-east India: performance of various landfill gas emission models. Environ Pollut 234:174–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gronlund CJ, Humbert S, Shaked S, O’Neill MS, Jolliet O (2015) Characterizing the burden of disease of particulate matter for life cycle impact assessment. Air Qual Atmos Health 8:29–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0283-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humbert S, Schryver AD, Bengoa X, Margni M, Jolliet O (2012) IMPACT 2002+: user guide, Draft for version Q2.21 (version adapted by Quantis)Google Scholar
  12. Ikhlayel M (2018) A systematic life cycle thinking approach to develop sustainable municipal solid waste management systems for developing countries. J Clean Prod 180:571–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar A, Sharma MP (2014) GHG emission and carbon sequestration potential from MSW of Indian metro cities. Urban Clim 8:30–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuzu SL (2018) Estimation and dispersion modeling of landing and take-off (LTO) cycle emissions from Atatürk International Airport. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:153–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0525-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu G, Hao Y, Dong L, Yang Z, Zhang Y, Ulgiati S (2017a) An emergy-LCA analysis of municipal solid waste management. Resour Conserv Recycl 120:131–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu Y, Xing P, Liu J (2017b) Environmental performance evaluation of different municipal solid waste management scenarios in China. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 125:106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mälkki H, Alanne K (2017) An overview of life cycle assessment (LCA) and research-based teaching in renewable and sustainable energy education. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:218–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manfredi S, Tonini D, Christensen TH, Scharff H (2009) Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manag Res 27:825–836.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X09348529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Myhre G, Highwood EJ, Shine KP, Stordal F (1998) New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases. Geophys Res Lett 25:2715–2718.  https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL01908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozeler D, Yetis U, Demirer GN (2006) Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study. Environ Int 32:405–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rajcoomar A, Ramjaewon T (2017) Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management scenarios on the small island of Mauritius. Waste Manag Res 35:313–324.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16679883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ripa M, Fiorentino G, Vacca V, Ulgiati S (2017) The relevance of site-specific data in life cycle assessment (LCA), the case of the municipal solid waste Management in the Metropolitan City of Naples (Italy). J Clean Prod 142:445–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SAIC (Scientific Applications International Corporation) (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and practice. In: EPA/600/R-06/060Google Scholar
  25. Sharma A, Saxena A, Sethi M, Shree V, Varun (2011) Life cycle assessment of buildings: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:871–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Talaiekhozani A, Nematzadeh S, Eskandari Z, Dehkordi AA, Rezania S (2018) Gaseous emissions of landfill and modeling of their dispersion in the atmosphere of Shahrekord, Iran. Urban Clim.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.10.005
  27. Thomas B, McDougall F (2005) International expert group on life cycle assessment for integrated waste management. J Cleaner Prod 13:321–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tuna Tuygun G, Altuğ H, Elbir T, Gaga E (2017) Modeling of air pollutant concentrations in an industrial region of Turkey. Environ Sci Pol Res 24:8260–8241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8835-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2006) Background report for a UNEP guide to life cycle management—a bridge to sustainable productsGoogle Scholar
  30. USEPA (2004) Aermod: description of model formulation. EPA 454/R-03-004 North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. USEPA (2005) Landfill gas emissions model (LandGEM) version 3.02 user’s guide. EPA-600/R-05/047Google Scholar
  32. Xing K, Qian W, Zaman AU (2016) Development of a cloud-based platform for foot print assessment in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 139:191–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yay ASE (2015) Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. J Clean Prod 94:284–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Afşın Yusuf Çetinkaya
    • 1
  • Levent Bilgili
    • 2
  • S. Levent Kuzu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Protection Technologies, Technical Sciences Vocational SchoolAksaray UniversityAksarayTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Naval Architecture and Marine EngineeringBandirma Onyedi Eylül UniversityBalikesirTurkey
  3. 3.Civil Engineering Faculty, Environmental Engineering DepartmentYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations