Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 423–429 | Cite as

The efficacy of news releases, news reports, and public nuisance complaints for determining smoke impacts to air quality from wildland fire

  • Ricardo Cisneros
  • Donald W. Schweizer


Understanding air quality impacts caused by smoke from wildland fire is a major concern in the western USA. The objectives of this paper were to examine news releases, news reports, and public nuisance complaints about smoke impacts caused by forest fires to determine if these different media sources were accurate indicators of wildland fire impacts to daily air quality from 2008 to 2013. Our findings suggest that media and complaints are poorly correlated to smoke impacts to air quality and should not be used as a proxy to establish days where air quality is impacted by smoke from forest fires. With the exception of 2008, media sources failed in accurately capturing ground level smoke impacts. Media sources were found to predict a smoke impact to air quality 32% of the time, while nuisance complaints predicted 15%. Successful smoke management and wildland fire policy should include a more consistently accurate message of smoke impacts. The majority of the smoke observed in Fresno originated from northern California forest fires and on a few days from forests south of the San Joaquin Valley (SJV). Urban cities in the SJV should be concern with land management strategies outside their air basin jurisdiction.


Media News releases Newspapers Complaints Smoke impacts Smoke management 



We thank Dr. Haiganoush Preisler, statistical scientist, of the US Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station for providing information on the statistical model and for reviewing this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Bloch-Elkon Y (2007) Studying the media, public opinion, and foreign policy in international crises: the United States and the Bosnian crisis, 1992-1995. Int J of Press/Polit 12(4):20–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boogaard H, Fische PH, Janssen NAH, Kos GPA, Weijers EP, Cassee FR, Van der Zee SC, de Hartog JJ, Meliefste K, Wang M, Brunekreef B, Hoek G (2013) Respiratory effects of a reduction in outdoor air pollution concentrations. Epidemiology 24:753–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38:1190–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burley JD, Bytnerowicz A, Buhler M, Zielinska B, Schweizer D, Cisneros R, Schilling S, Varela JC, McDaniel M, Horn M, Dulen D (2016) Air quality at Devils Postpile National Monument, Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA. Aerosol Air Qual Res 16:2315–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cisneros R, Schweizer D, Zhong S, Hammond K, Perez MA, Guo Q, Traina S, Bytnerowicz A, Bennett DH (2012) Analysing the effects of the 2002 McNally fire on air quality in the San Joaquin Valley and southern sierra Nevada, California. Int J Wildland Fire 21(8):1065–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cisneros R, Schweizer D, Preisler H, Bennett DH, Shaw G, Bytnerowicz A (2014) Spatial and seasonal patterns of particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California. Atmos Pollut Res 5:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cisneros R, Brown P, Cameron L, Gaab E, Gonzalez M, Ramondt S, Veloz D, Son A, Schweizer D (2017) Understanding public views about air quality and air pollution sources in the San Joaquin Valley, California. J Environ Public Health
  8. Jiang W, Wang Y, Tsou MH, Fu X (2015) Using social media to detect outdoor air pollution and monitor air quality index (AQI): a geo-targeted spatiotemporal analysis framework with Sina Weibo (Chinese Twitter). PLoS One.
  9. Johnson BB (2012) Experience with urban air pollution in Patterson, New Jersey and implications for air pollution communication. Risk Anal 32(1):39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li P, Xin JY, Wang YS, Wang SG, Li GX, Pan XC, Liu ZR, Wang LL (2013) The acute effects of fine particles on respiratory mortality and morbidity in Beijing, 2004–2009. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:6433–6444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Naeher LP, Brauer M, Lipsett M, Zelikoff JT, Simpson CD, Koenig JQ, Smith KR (2007) Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol 19:67–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Navarro KM, Cisneros R, O’Neil S, Schweizer D, Larkin NK, Balmes JR (2016) Air-quality impacts and intake fraction of PM2.5 during the 2013 Rim Megafire. Environ Sci Technol 50(21):11965–11973Google Scholar
  13. NOAA (2016). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration hazard mapping system fire and smoke product [WWW document]. URL (accessed 10.27.16)
  14. Preisler HK, Schweizer D, Cisneros R, Procter T, Ruminski M, Tarnay L (2015) A statistical model for determining impact of wildland fires on particulate matter (PM2.5) in Central California aided by satellite imagery of smoke. Environ Pollut 205:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. SJVAPCD (2016). San Joaquin Valley air pollution control news archive. [WWW document]. URL Accessed 15 Dec 2016
  16. Sachdeva S, McCaffrey S, Locke D (2016) Social media approaches to modeling wildfire smoke dispersion: spatiotemporal and social scientific investigations. Inf Commun Soc 20(8):1146–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sapkota A, Symons JM, Kleissl J, Wan L, Parlange MB, Ondov J, Breysse PN, Diette GB, Eggleston PA, Buckley TJ (2005) Impact of the 2002 Canadian Forest fires on particulate matter air quality in Baltimore City. Environ Sci Technol 39:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schweizer D, Cisneros R (2014) Wildland fire management and air quality in the southern Sierra Nevada: using the Lion Fire as a case study with a multi-year perspective on PM 2.5 impacts and fire policy. J Environ Manag 144:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schweizer DW, Cisneros R (2016) Forest fire policy: change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health. Air Qual Atmosphere Health 10(1):33–36Google Scholar
  20. Schweizer D, Cisneros R, Shaw G (2016) A comparative analysis of temporary and permanent beta attenuation monitors: the importance of understanding data and equipment limitations when creating PM2.5 air quality health advisories. Atmos Pollut Res 7:865–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schweizer D, Cisneors R, Traina S, Ghezzehei TA, Shaw G (2017) Using National Ambient air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter to assess regional wildland fire smoke and air quality management. J Environ Manag 201:345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stein AF, Draxler RR, Rolph GD, Stunder BJB, Cohen MD, Ngan F (2015) NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, Bull. Amer. Meteor Soc 96:2059-2077.
  23. U.S. EPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2004) Air quality criteria for particulate matter: (final report, Oct 2004), EPA600/P–99/002aF–bF, 2004. Washington, DC, 900 pagesGoogle Scholar
  24. Vedal S, Dutton SJ (2006) Wildfire air pollution and daily mortality in a large urban area. Environ Res 102:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wakefield SE, Elliott SJ (2003) Constructing the news: the role of local newspapers in environmental risk communication. Prof Geogr 55(2):216–226Google Scholar
  26. Zamith R, Pinto J, Villar ME (2012) Constructing climate change in the Americas: an analysis of news coverage in U.S. and south American newspapers. Sci Commun 35(3):334–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Sciences Research InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaMercedUSA

Personalised recommendations