Skip to main content
Log in

Is There a Role for Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?

  • Head and Neck Cancer (J-P Machiels, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Given the potential for long-term toxicities from concurrent chemoradiation, there is great interest in surgery as a primary treatment modality for head and neck cancers, particularly in the younger HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patient. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has proven to be an effective technique to safely treat oropharyngeal and select supraglottic tumors surgically. Sound, traditional surgical principles are employed using improved endoscopic visualization and precise instrumentation to perform oncologic surgery without the morbidity of transmandibular or transcervical approaches. Although level 1 evidence prospective clinical trials are currently underway for TORS, the literature supports its safety and efficacy based on numerous studies. Currently, prospective randomized trials are underway to provide better evidence for or against TORS in oropharyngeal cancer. Patient selection based on comorbidities, anatomy, and available pathological data is critical in choosing patients for TORS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: ••Of major importance

  1. Stern SJ. Anatomy of the lateral pharyngotomy approach. Head Neck. 1992;14(2):153–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaha AR. Mandibulotomy and mandibulectomy in difficult tumors of the base of the tongue and oropharynx. Semin Surg Oncol. 1991;7(1):25–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spiro RH, Gerold FP, Shah JP, Sessions RB, Strong EW. Mandibulotomy approach to oropharyngeal tumors. Am J Surg. 1985;150(4):466–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM, Stringer SP, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: surgery, radiation therapy, or both. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2967–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calais G, Alfonsi M, Bardet E, et al. Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91(24):2081–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):24–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pignon JP, le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J, Group M-NC. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2009;92(1):4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White HN, Frederick J, Zimmerman T, Carroll WR, Magnuson JS. Learning curve for transoral robotic surgery: a 4-year analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(6):564–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(12):1220–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116(1):19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boudreaux BA, Rosenthal EL, Magnuson JS, et al. Robot-assisted surgery for upper aerodigestive tract neoplasms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(4):397–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Genden EM, Desai S, Sung CK. Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: a preliminary experience. Head Neck. 2009;31(3):283–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(8):1465–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solares CA, Strome M. Transoral robot-assisted CO2 laser supraglottic laryngectomy: experimental and clinical data. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(5):817–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holsinger FC, Ferris RL. Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery and its role within the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm of oropharynx cancer: robotics, lasers, and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3285–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rich JT, Milov S, Lewis Jr JS, Thorstad WL, Adkins DR, Haughey BH. Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) +/- adjuvant therapy for advanced stage oropharyngeal cancer: outcomes and prognostic factors. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(9):1709–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haughey BH, Hinni ML, Salassa JR, et al. Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer: a United States multicenter study. Head Neck. 2011;33(12):1683–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haus BM, Kambham N, Le D, Moll FM, Gourin C, Terris DJ. Surgical robotic applications in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(7):1139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(7):1315–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Magnuson JS, et al. Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(8):1701–7. Multicenter study establishing safety and feasibility of transoral robotic surgery.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zevallos JP, Mitra N, Swisher-McClure S. Patterns of care and perioperative outcomes in transoral endoscopic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2016;38(3):402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kucur C, Durmus K, Gun R, et al. Safety and efficacy of concurrent neck dissection and transoral robotic surgery. Head Neck. 2015.

  23. Mandal R, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Kaffenberger TM, Choby GW, Kim S. Analysis of post-transoral robotic-assisted surgery hemorrhage: frequency, outcomes, and prevention. Head Neck. 2015.

  24. Olsen SM, Moore EJ, Koch CA, Price DL, Kasperbauer JL, Olsen KD. Transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33(4):379–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozer E, Alvarez B, Kakarala K, Durmus K, Teknos TN, Carrau RL. Clinical outcomes of transoral robotic supraglottic laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2013;35(8):1158–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lallemant B, Chambon G, Garrel R, et al. Transoral robotic surgery for the treatment of T1-T2 carcinoma of the larynx: preliminary study. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(10):2485–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park YM, Kim WS, Byeon HK, Lee SY, Kim SH. Surgical techniques and treatment outcomes of transoral robotic supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(3):670–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mendelsohn AH, Remacle M, Van Der Vorst S, Bachy V, Lawson G. Outcomes following transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):208–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Park YM, Byeon HK, Chung HP, Choi EC, Kim SH. Comparison of treatment outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and supraglottic partial laryngectomy: our experience with seventeen and seventeen patients respectively. Clin Otolaryngol Off J ENT-UK Off J Netherlands Soc Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Cervico-Facial Surg. 2013;38(3):270–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ansarin M, Zorzi S, Massaro MA, et al. Transoral robotic surgery vs transoral laser microsurgery for resection of supraglottic cancer: a pilot surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assisted Surg MRCAS. 2013.

  31. Razafindranaly V, Lallemant B, Aubry K, et al. Clinical outcomes with transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: experience of a French evaluation cooperative subgroup of GETTEC. Head Neck. 2015.

  32. Nichols AC, Yoo J, Hammond JA, et al. Early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: radiotherapy vs. trans-oral robotic surgery (ORATOR)—study protocol for a randomized phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. de Almeida JR, Byrd JK, Wu R, et al. A systematic review of transoral robotic surgery and radiotherapy for early oropharynx cancer: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2096–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Morisod B, Simon C. Meta-analysis on survival of patients treated with transoral surgery versus radiotherapy for early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Head Neck. 2014.

  35. de Almeida JR, Li R, Magnuson JS, et al. Oncologic outcomes after transoral robotic surgery: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(12):1043–51. The largest prospective study to date demonstrating oncologic efficacy of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Li JG. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(11):2218–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eisbruch A, Harris J, Garden AS, et al. Multi-institutional trial of accelerated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage oropharyngeal cancer (RTOG 00-22). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(5):1333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Garden AS, Morrison WH, Wong PF, et al. Disease-control rates following intensity-modulated radiation therapy for small primary oropharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(2):438–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mehta V, Johnson P, Tassler A, et al. A new paradigm for the diagnosis and management of unknown primary tumors of the head and neck: a role for transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):146–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Motz K, Qualliotine JR, Rettig E, Richmon JD, Eisele DW, Fakhry C. Changes in unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck at initial presentation in the era of human papillomavirus. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016:1–7.

  41. Byrd JK, Smith KJ, de Almeida JR, et al. Transoral robotic surgery and the unknown primary: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(6):976–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Durmus K, Rangarajan SV, Old MO, Agrawal A, Teknos TN, Ozer E. Transoral robotic approach to carcinoma of unknown primary. Head Neck. 2013.

  43. Kang SY, Dziegielewski PT, Old MO, Ozer E. Transoral robotic surgery for carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(7):697–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Patel SA, Magnuson JS, Holsinger FC, et al. Robotic surgery for primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown site. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(11):1203–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Richmon JD, Quon H, Gourin CG. The effect of transoral robotic surgery on short-term outcomes and cost of care after oropharyngeal cancer surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(1):165–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moore EJ, Hinni ML, Olsen KD, Price DL, Laborde RR, Inman JC. Cost considerations in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(6):946–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gold M. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Med Care. 1996;34(12 Suppl):DS197–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. de Almeida JR, Villanueva NL, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Preferences and utilities for health states after treatment for oropharyngeal cancer: transoral robotic surgery versus definitive (chemo) radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2014;36(7):923–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. de Almeida JR, Moskowitz AJ, Miles BA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus (chemo) radiotherapy for early T classification oropharyngeal carcinoma: a cost-utility analysis. Head Neck. 2014;38(4):589–600. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrating that surgical based strategies for oropharyngeal cancer are less costly and associated with increased quality-adjusted life years compared to nonsurgical treatment.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Maxwell JH, Ferris RL, Gooding W, et al. Extracapsular spread in head and neck carcinoma: impact of site and human papillomavirus status. Cancer. 2013;119(18):3302–8. Retrospective study demonstrating that extracapsular extension does not carry the same prognosis for oropharyngeal cancers.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sinha P, Lewis Jr JS, Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Haughey BH. Extracapsular spread and adjuvant therapy in human papillomavirus-related, p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(14):3519–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF, et al. Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck. 2005;27(10):843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Machtay M, Moughan J, Trotti A, et al. Factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3582–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Francis DO, Weymuller Jr EA, Parvathaneni U, Merati AL, Yueh B. Dysphagia, stricture, and pneumonia in head and neck cancer patients: does treatment modality matter? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119(6):391–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hutcheson KA, Holsinger FC, Kupferman ME, Lewin JS. Functional outcomes after TORS for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review. Eur Arch Oto Rhino Laryngol Off J Eur Fed Otorhinolaryngol Soc (EUFOS): Affiliated German Soc Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;272(2):463–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wilson JA, Carding PN, Patterson JM. Dysphagia after nonsurgical head and neck cancer treatment: patients’ perspectives. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(5):767–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS, Barringer DA, et al. Late dysphagia after radiotherapy-based treatment of head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(23):5793–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Maxwell JH, Rath TJ, Byrd JK, et al. Accuracy of computed tomography to predict extracapsular spread in p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(7):1613–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. White H, Ford S, Bush B, et al. Salvage surgery for recurrent cancers of the oropharynx: comparing TORS with standard open surgical approaches. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(8):773–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. de Almeida JR, Park RC, Genden EM. Reconstruction of transoral robotic surgery defects: principles and techniques. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28(7):465–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Ferris M.D. Ph.D..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Head and Neck Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byrd, J.K., Ferris, R.L. Is There a Role for Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 17, 29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-016-0405-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-016-0405-5

Keywords

Navigation