Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What role does professional noticing play? Examining connections with affect and mathematical knowledge for teaching among preservice teachers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 13 February 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

This study examined the intersections of preservice elementary teachers’ (PSET) professional noticing (PN) of children’s mathematical thinking, two mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) domains: mathematics content knowledge (MCK) and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge (MPCK), and two affective domains: attitudes and dispositions toward teaching mathematics. An instructional module focused on PN of children’s early algebraic thinking, as defined by Jacobs et al. (J Res Math Educ 41: 169–202, 2010) to include three components: attending, interpreting, and deciding, was implemented with 170 PSETs. The PSETs, who participated in the instructional module, the implementation group, showed significant positive growth in attending, interpreting, and attitudes toward mathematics. There was no significant change in dispositions toward teaching mathematics and a decrease was observed in PSET deciding and MKT. A comparison group of 126 PSETs enrolled in mathematics methods courses did not participate in the instructional module. PSETs in the comparison group showed a decrease across all measures including attending, interpreting, deciding, attitudes, dispositions, and MKT. Results showed statistically significant connections within and between some of the constructs; however, the limitations of the study call for further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. It is important to note that Blömeke et al. (2015) refer to dispositional resources as encompassing affect and cognition while the MECSD (Jong & Hodges, 2015) measures dispositions as defined by Philipp (2007).

References

  • Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. M. (1999). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brese, F., & Tatto, M. T. (2012). User guide for the TEDS-M international database. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro Superfine, A., Fisher, A., Bragelman, J., & Amador, J. M. (2017). Shifting perspectives on preservice teachers’ noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 409–426). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, C. Y. (2015). Working at the intersection of teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, and teaching practice: A multiple-case study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9318-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, C. Y., Hill, H. C., Chin, M. J., & McGinn, D. (2020). Mathematical content knowledge and knowledge for teaching: Exploring their distinguishability and contribution to student learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23, 579–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09443-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 300–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, L. K. (2017). Investigating the relationship between professional noticing and specialized content knowledge. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 339–358). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. H., Schack, E. O., Thomas, J., Jong, C., Eisenhardt, S., Tassell, J., & Yoder, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics and professional noticing capacities. In J.-J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 219–237). Berlin: Springer International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J., Schack, E. O., Jong, C., & Tassel, J. (2018). Noticing numeracy now!: Examining changes in preservice teachers’ noticing, knowledge, and attitudes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(2), 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J., Jong, C., Schack, E. O., & Dueber, D. (2019). Comparing preservice teachers’ professional noticing skills in elementary mathematics classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 119(3), 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floro, B., & Bostic, J. (2017). A case study of middle school teachers’ noticing during modeling with mathematics tasks. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 73–89). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, W. G. (2012). Examining what inservice elementary teachers notice when presented with instances of students mathematical thinking. Proceedings of the 34rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.

  • Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105, 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, N., Linsell, C., & Offen, B. (2018). Growing mathematics teachers: Pre-service primary teachers’ relationships with mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(3), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., & Spangler, D. A. (2017). Research on core practices in K-12 mathematics teaching. In J. Cai (Ed.) Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 766–792. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., Philipp, R. A., & Schappelle, B. P. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 97–116). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Sherin, M. G., & Philipp, R. A., (2013). Mathematics teacher noticing: A hidden skill of teaching. Work Group presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 723–729. Chicago, IL.

  • Jacobson, E., & Kilpatrick, J. (2015). Understanding teacher affect, knowledge, and instruction over time: An agenda for research on productive disposition for teaching mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(5), 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong, C., & Hodges, T. E. (2015). Assessing attitudes toward mathematics across teacher education contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(5), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2015). About the complexities of video-based assessments: Theoretical and methodological approaches to overcoming shortcomings of research on teachers’ competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanyongo, G. Y., Brook, G. P., Kyei-Blankson, L., & Gocmen, G. (2007). Reliability and statistical power: How measurement fallibility affects power and required sample sizes for several parametric and nonparametric statistics. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N. (2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 845–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupa, E. E., Huey, M., Lesseig, K., Casey, S., & Monson, D. (2017). Investigating secondary preservice teacher noticing of students’ mathematical thinking. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 49–72). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutaka, T. S., Ren, L., Smith, W. M., Beattie, H. L., Edwards, C. P., Green, J. L., et al. (2018). Examining change in K-3 teachers’ mathematical knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs: The case of Primarily Math. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(2), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larochelle, R., & Mammo, B. (2019). Correlations between professional noticing of students’ mathematical thinking and specialized content knowledge. In S. Otten, A. G. Candela, Z. de Araujo, C. Haines, & C. Munter (Eds.), Proceedings of the forty-first annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. St Louis: University of Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2018). Winsteps® (Version 4.3.1) [Computer Software]. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.

  • Pehkonen, E., & Toerner, G. (1996). Introduction to the theme: Mathematical beliefs. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 28, 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1, 257–315. Information Age.

  • Pourdavood, R. G., & Liu, X. (2017). Pre-service elementary teachers’ experiences, expectations, beliefs, and attitudes toward mathematics teaching and learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(11), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesken, B., Pepin, B., & Toerner, G. (2011). Beliefs and beyond: Affect and the teaching and learning of mathematics. ZDM, 43(4), 451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM, 48(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J., Eisenhardt, S., Tassell, J., & Yoder, M. (2013). Prospective elementary school teachers’ professional noticing of children’s early numeracy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9240-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., & Wilhelm, J. (Eds.). (2017). Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schack, E. O., Dueber, D., Jong, C., Thomas, J., & Fisher, M. H. (2019). Computer-programmed decision trees for assessing teacher noticing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Toronto, Canada.

  • Schackow, J. B. (2005). Examining the attitudes toward mathematics of preservice elementary school teachers enrolled in an introductory mathematics methods course and the experiences that have influenced the development of these attitudes. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/853.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2015). What counts, when? Reflection on beliefs, affect, attitude, orientations, habits of mind, grain size, time scale, context, theory, and method. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 395–404). Berlin: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of teacher noticing: Commentary. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 401–408). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand?: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: A systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM, 48, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockero, S. L. (2008). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9079-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swars, S. L., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., Carothers, J., & Myers, K. (2018). The preparation experiences of elementary mathematics specialists: examining influences on beliefs, content knowledge, and teaching practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(2), 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E., II. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8, 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.

  • Thomas, J., Jong, C., Fisher, M. H., & Schack, E. O. (2017). Noticing and knowledge: Exploring theoretical connections between professional noticing and mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 26(2), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 97–116). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. L. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a collaborative grant from the National Science Foundation IUSE Awards: 1431098, 1431133, and 1431631. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kentucky, 105 Taylor Education Building, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA

    Cindy Jong, Molly H. Fisher & Jonathan Thomas

  2. Morehead State University, 304 Ginger Hall, Morehead, KY, 40351, USA

    Edna O. Schack

  3. University of Kentucky, 237 Dickey Hall, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA

    David Dueber

Authors
  1. Cindy Jong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edna O. Schack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Molly H. Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonathan Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Dueber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy Jong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jong, C., Schack, E.O., Fisher, M.H. et al. What role does professional noticing play? Examining connections with affect and mathematical knowledge for teaching among preservice teachers. ZDM Mathematics Education 53, 151–164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01210-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01210-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation