Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 315–324 | Cite as

Exploration of the bearing capacity of Taparura Artificial Beach using the standard penetration test

Article

Abstract

This work was undertaken within the framework of an environmental follow-up program of the Taparura zone after completion of depollution and artificial beach nourishment works along a coastline of 6 km in the northern coast of Sfax town, Tunisia. The realized recognition investigation aimed to explore the geomechanical characteristics of the surface sediment in the coastal fringe of the project site by evaluating its bearing capacity up to 500 m in the seaside from the new coastline in order to check the safety of the users. A Standard Penetration Test (SPT) with a penetration of approximately 45 cm concerned a total of 288 coastal stations along the zone. The results provided a detailed description of the geotechnical aspects of the sediment including the bearing capacity of the beach corresponding to the relaxed position on two feet, and the user load in motion on one foot, or half a foot. Finally, prognostic maps were respectively drawn that can serve as a guide for the safety of the beach users in a contribution to a local beach occupation plan.

Keywords

SPT Artificial beach Bearing capacity Load distribution Prognostic maps 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was done with the collaboration of the Company of Studies and Development of the Northern Coast of the City of Sfax as the managing institution of the Taparura project, and the Tunisian Agency of Coastal Protection and Management as a contribution to the realization of a Beach Occupation Plan.

References

  1. ASTM (1984), Designation: D 1586-84 standard test method for penetration test and split-barrel sampling of soils: American Society for Testing and Materials: annual book of standards, Vol 408 Soil and Rock (I): D 420–D-4914, pp. 137–141Google Scholar
  2. Callaert B, Hentati R (2011) Sustainable development in the City of Sfax (Tunisia) - Taparura project, IWWG proceedings Sardinia, p12Google Scholar
  3. Fletcher, G. F. A. (1965) Standard Penetration Test: Its uses and abuses. Journal Soil Mechanics Foundations Division, ASCE, 91(SM4), pp. 67–75Google Scholar
  4. Gouider M, Choura M (2013) Sfax City southern coast reclamation drawn on the Taparua project acquired know-how, proceedings of the 26th AFA international fertilizers technology conference, Tunisia P56Google Scholar
  5. Koffler A, Choura M, Bendriss A, Zengerink E (2008) Geosynthetics in protection against erosion for river and coastal banks and marine and hydraulic construction. J Coast Conserv 12:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lutenegger AJ (2008) The Standard Penetration Test – more than just a one number test, Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization – Huang & Mayne (eds) Taylor & Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Nassaji F, Kalantari B (2011) SPT capability to estimate Undrained shear strength of fine-grained soils of Tehran, Iran. The. Electron J Geotech Eng 16:42Google Scholar
  8. NF P94–116 (1991) Sols : reconnaissance et essais – Essai de pénétration au carottier (Indice de classement : P94–116)Google Scholar
  9. Riggs CO (1986) North American Standard Penetration Test Practice: An Essay, in Use of in Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering: ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No 6Google Scholar
  10. Robertson K, Campanella RG, Wightman A (1983) SPT-CPT correlations. ASCE J Geotech Eng 109(11):1449–1459Google Scholar
  11. Rogers JD (2006) Subsurface Exploration using the Standard Penetration Test and the Cone Penetrometer Test, the Geological Society of America. Environ Eng Geosci XIII(2):161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging and overconsolidation. Geotechnique 36(3):425–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tayibi H, Mo C, Lopez FA, Alguacil FJ, Lopez-Delgado A (2009) Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum. J Environ Manag 90:2377–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1967) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New York 729Google Scholar
  15. Zatuwa M (2005) Beware, soft ground and the standard penetration test (in Japanese) Public Works Research Institute University of Missouri - Rolla Class notes on the SPTGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radio-analysis and Environment Laboratory. National Engineering SchoolSfax UniversitySfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations