Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying and structuring objectives for a coral reef protection plan at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Region 2 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency initiated a Coral Reef Protection Plan (CRPP) in 2014 to reduce anthropogenic stress on Caribbean coral reefs. The CRPP is intended to foster institutional practices that improve reef condition and focus regulatory and non-regulatory decision making on minimizing pollutant release to coastal systems. A framework incorporating two sets of objectives was constructed to examine the short- and long-term costs and benefits of tasks. The first set of objectives was derived from existing tasks in the CRPP and was intended to support an update of the CRPP for 2015. Fundamental objectives were constructed to communicate the end objectives across tasks and means objectives were constructed to communicate the means for achieving them. The second set of objectives was created to reflect costs and benefits of the CRPP beyond 2015. These objectives contained fundamental objectives comprising broad social, economic, learning and governance topics. The means objectives included tasks such as building capacity, providing regulatory oversight, and learning and reducing uncertainties. The second set of objectives also included strategic objectives that identify long-range benefits such as coral reef integrity and reef ecosystem services. The process of defining objectives helped to ascertain and better elucidate the important consequences for the CRPP. Understanding objectives not only provides a roadmap for coral reef protection but can help Region 2 communicate internally and externally with other agencies, industry, and the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belton V (1999) Multi-criteria problem structuring and analysis in a value theory framework. In: Gal T, Stewart TJ, Hanne T (eds) Multicriteria decision making: advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory and applications. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp 335–366

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley P, Fore L, Fisher W, Davis W (2010) Coral reef biological criteria: using the clean water act to protect a national treasure. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett. EPA/600/R-10/054, 153 p

  • Bradley P, Santavy DL, Gerritsen J (2014) Workshop on biological integrity of coral reefs, August 21–22, 2012, Caribbean Coral Reef Institute, Isla Magueyes, La Parguera, Puerto Rico. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett. EPA/600/R-13/350, 128 p

  • Browne NK, Smithers SG, Perry CT (2012) Coral reefs of the turbid inner-shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: an environmental and geomorphic perspective on their occurrence, composition and growth. Earth-Sci Rev 115:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Romero MJ, Chan KMA, McDaniels T, Dalmer DM (2011) Structuring decision-making for ecosystem-based management. Mar Policy 35:575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher WS (2007) Stony coral rapid bioassessment protocol. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/R-06/167, 60 p

  • Fore LS, Karr JR, Fisher WS, Davis WS (2008) Making waves with the Clean Water Act. Science 322:1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fore LS, Karr JR, Fisher WS, Bradley P, Davis WS (2009) Heeding a call to action for U.S. coral reefs: the untapped potential of the Clean Water Act. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1421–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R, Keeney RL (1994) Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manag Sci 40(8):1035–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RS, Keeney RL (2002) Making smarter environmental management decisions. J Am Water Res Assoc 38(6):1601–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D, García-Quijano C, Valdés-Pizzini M (2013) A fresh defense: a cultural biography of quality in Puerto Rican fishing. Am Anthropol 115(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall NM, Berry KLE, Rintoul L, Hoogenboom MO (2015) Microplastic ingestion by scleractinian corals. Mar Biol 162(3):725–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC, Donovan MK, Cramer KL, Lam VV (2014) Status and trends of Caribbean coral reefs: 1970–2012. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, p 306

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns GM, Leeworthy VR, Bell FW, Bonn MA (2003) Socioeconomic study of reefs in Southeast Florida. Final report, 349 p

  • Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, McDaniels TL (2001) A framework to guide thinking and analysis regarding climate change policies. Risk Anal 21(6):989–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, McDaniels TL, Ridge-Cooney VL (1996) Using values in planning wastewater facilities for metropolitan Seattle. Water Resour Bull 32(2):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss RS, Kingsley JY (2010) Volunteer health and emotional wellbeing in marine protected areas. Ocean Coast Manag 53:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Moberg E (2012) Multi-criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels T, Longstaff H, Dowlatabadi H (2006) A value-based framework for risk management decisions involving multiple scales: a salmon aquaculture example. Environ Sci Pol 9:423–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkhofer MW, Keeney RL (1987) A multiattribute analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. Risk Anal 7(2):173–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver LM, Lehrter JC, Fisher WS (2011) Relating landscape development intensity to coral reef condition in the watersheds of St. Croix, US Virgin Islands. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 427:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Principe P, Bradley P, Yee S, Fisher W, Johnson E, Allen P, Campbell D. (2012) Quantifying coral reef ecosystem services. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park. EPA/600/R-11/206, 147 p

  • Ramos-Scharrón CE, Torres-Pulliza D, Hernández-Delgado EA (2015) Watershed- and island wide-scale land cover changes in Puerto Rico (1930s–2004) and their potential effects on coral reef ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 506-507:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager TP, Satterstrom FK, Linkov I, Tuler SP, Kay R (2007) Typological review of environmental performance metrics (with illustrative examples for oil spill response). Integr Environ Assess Manag 3(3):310–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TB, Nemeth RS, Blondeau J, Calnan JM, Kadison E, Herzlieb S (2008) Assessing coral reef health across onshore to offshore stress gradients. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1983–1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TB, Brandt ME, Calnan JM, Nemeth RS, Blondeau J, Kadison E, Taylor M, Rothenberger JP (2013) Convergent mortality responses of Caribbean coral species to seawater warming. Ecosphere 4(7):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding MD, Ravilious C, Green EP (2001) World atlas of coral reefs. University of California Press, Berkeley 432 p

    Google Scholar 

  • USCRTF (2016) Handbook on coral reef impacts: avoidance, minimization, compensatory mitigation and restoration. United States Coral Reef Task Force, Coral Injury and Mitigation Working Group 152 p

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2012) Best management practices for marinas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Pollution Prevention Team, 20 p

  • UVICES (2002) Virgin Islands environmental protection handbook 2002. University of the Virgin Islands Cooperative Extension Service 302 p

  • von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan KRT, Miller J, Sanchez O, Patterson M (2007) Impact of the 2005 coral bleaching event on Porites porites and Colpophyllia natans at Tektite Reef, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 26:689–693

  • Wilkinson C (2008) Status of the coral reefs of the world: 2008. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre, Townsville 296 p

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (2010) Climate, carbon and coral reefs. World Meteorological Organization/Convention on Biological Diversity, Geneva. WMO-No. 1063, 32 p

  • Woody K, Atkinson A, Clark R, Jeffrey C, Lundgren I, Miller J, Monaco M, Muller E, Patterson M, Rogers C, Smith T, Spitzak T, Waara R, Whelan K, Witcher B, Wright A (2008) Coral bleaching in the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2005 and 2006. In: Wilkinson C, Souter D (eds) Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre, Townsville, pp 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI (2011) Reefs at risk revisited. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. 130 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Region 2 personnel and CRPP task leaders for their valuable contributions and assistance in understanding coral reef protection initiatives and objectives: Kathleen Anderson, Sergio Bosques, Peter Brandt, Jim Casey, Moses Chang, Evelyn Huertas, Jaime Lopez, John Martin, Pedro Modesto, Douglas Pabst, David Pohle, Carl Soderberg, and Donna Somboonlakana. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the ORISE participant research program through an interagency agreement between the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Energy. John F. Carriger was an ORISE participant at the U.S. EPA during the tenure of this study. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Carriger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carriger, J.F., Fisher, W.S., LoBue, C.T. et al. Identifying and structuring objectives for a coral reef protection plan at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. J Coast Conserv 22, 263–281 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0571-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0571-z

Keywords

Navigation