Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 529–543 | Cite as

Participation in crowdfunding among users of collaborative platforms: the role of innovativeness and social capital

  • Cayetano Medina-MolinaEmail author
  • Manuel Rey-Moreno
  • J. Augusto Felício
  • Inmaculada Romano Paguillo
Original Paper

Abstract

This work aims to elucidate the profile of participants in crowdfunding initiatives among users of collaborative platforms, considering them as agents with a high likelihood of taking part in these initiatives due to being users of digital services. This delimitation is performed by investigating the link between two intrinsic factors (innovativeness and social capital) and participation in crowdfunding initiatives. After the analysis of a sample generated by the Sociological Research Centre (CIS) of 422 users of collaborative platforms, it is found that the two intrinsic factors analyzed are linked with participation in crowdfunding initiatives. Moreover, differentiation in participation among users of collaborative platforms corresponds to the adoption of new services (higher for crowdfunding participants) and bridging social capital (lower for crowdfunding participants). The results obtained suggest incorporation of crowdfunding projects in vertical thematic financial platforms to take advantage of the effect of social capital and innovative capacity to increase participation and maintain diversity of effective financing formulas.

Keywords

Multi-sided platform Crowdfunding Intrinsic factors Innovativeness Social capital 

JEL Classification

M13 M31 O33 

Notes

References

  1. Ahlers GK, Cumming D, Günther C, Schweizer D (2015) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract 39(4):955–980Google Scholar
  2. Akgün AE, Keskin H, Kırcovali SY (2018) Organizational wisdom practices and firm product innovation. Rev Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0243-2 Google Scholar
  3. Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2014) Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd. J Bus Ventur 29(5):585–609Google Scholar
  4. Bi S, Liu Z, Usman K (2017) The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. J Bus Res 71:10–18Google Scholar
  5. Bouncken RB, Reuschl AJ (2018) Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-025-y Google Scholar
  6. Butticè V, Colombo MG, Wright M (2017) Serial crowdfunding, social capital, and project success. Entrep Theory Pract 41(2):183–207.  https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12271 Google Scholar
  7. Cennamo C, Santaló J (2015) How to avoid platform traps. MIT Sloan Rev 57(1):12–15Google Scholar
  8. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2015) Actitudes y Comportamientos Innovadores en la Sociedad Española. http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/2_bancodatos/estudios/listaEstudiosYear.jsp?year=2015. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
  9. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2018) Memoria de actividades 2017. http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/-Archivos/Memorias/MEMORIA_CIS_2017.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
  10. Chen Y, Zhang W, Yan X, Jin J (2018) The life-cycle influence mechanism of the determinants of financing performance: an empirical study of a Chinese crowdfunding platform. Rev Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0295-y Google Scholar
  11. Cho M, Kim G (2017) A cross-cultural comparative analysis of crowdfunding projects in the United States and South Korea. Comput Hum Behav 72:312–320Google Scholar
  12. Clauss T, Breitenecker RJ, Kraus S, Brem A, Richter C (2017) Directing the wisdom of the crowd: the importance of social interaction among founders and the crowd during crowdfunding campaigns. Econ Innov New Technol 8:1–21Google Scholar
  13. Dapp TF (2017) Fintech: the digital transformation in the financial sector. In: Osburg T, Lohrmann C (eds) Sustainability in a digital world. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–199Google Scholar
  14. Davis BC, Hmieleski KM, Webb JW, Coombs JE (2017) Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: the influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. J Bus Ventur 32(1):90–106Google Scholar
  15. European Commission (2017) Crowdfunding. Reshaping the crowd’s engagement in cultureGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans DS, Schmalensee R (2016) Matchmakers: the new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press, WatertownGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng Y, Ye HJ, Yu Y, Yang C, Cui T (2018) Gamification artifacts and crowdsourcing participation: examining the mediating role of intrinsic motivations. Comput Hum Behav 81:124–136Google Scholar
  18. Ferreira JJM, Fernandes CI, Kraus S (2018) Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Rev Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0242-3 Google Scholar
  19. García-Villaverde PM, Rodrigo-Alarcón J, Parra-Requena G, Ruiz-Ortega MJ (2018) Technological dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: the heterogeneous effects of social capital. J Bus Res 83:51–64Google Scholar
  20. Gedda D, Nilsson B, Såthén Z, Solberg Søilen K (2016) Crowdfunding: finding the optimal platform for funders and entrepreneurs. Technol Innov Manag Rev 6(3):31–40Google Scholar
  21. Heinze KL, Heinze JE (2018) Individual innovation adoption and the role of organizational culture. Rev Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0300-5 Google Scholar
  22. Helm R, Landschulze S (2009) Optimal stimulation level theory, exploratory consumer behaviour and product adoption: an analysis of underlying structures across product categories. Rev Manag Sci 3:41–73Google Scholar
  23. Herzberg F (1968) One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harvard Bus Rev 46:53–62Google Scholar
  24. Kang L, Jiang Q, Tan C-H (2016) Remarkable advocates: an investigation of geographic distance and social capital for crowdfunding. Inf Manag 54(3):336–348Google Scholar
  25. Klimas P, Czakon W (2018) Organizational innovativeness and coopetition: a study of video game developers. Rev Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0269-5 Google Scholar
  26. Kraus S, Meier F, Niemand T (2016a) Experimental methods in entrepreneurship research: the status quo. Int J Entrep Behav Res 22(6):958–983Google Scholar
  27. Kraus S, Richter C, Brem A, Cheng CF, Chang ML (2016b) Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. J Innov Knowl 1(1):13–23Google Scholar
  28. Liang H, Wang M-M, Wang J-J, Xue Y (2018) How intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives affect task effort in crowdsourcing contests: a mediated moderation model. Comput Hum Behav 81:168–176Google Scholar
  29. Martínez-Román JA, Romero I (2017) Determinants of innovativeness in SMEs: disentangling core innovation and technology adoption capabilities. Rev Manag Sci 11:543–596Google Scholar
  30. McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategies, emergent views and next steps. Strateg Manag J 38(1):141–160Google Scholar
  31. Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 29(1):1–16Google Scholar
  32. Niemand T, Angerer M, Thies F, Kraus S, Hebenstreit R (2018) Equity crowdfunding across borders: a conjoint experiment. Int J Entrep Behav Res 24(4):911–932Google Scholar
  33. Nucciarelli A, Li F, Fernandes KJ, Goumagias N, Cabras I, Devlin S, Kudenko D, Cowling P (2017) From value chains to technological platforms: the effects of crowdfunding in the digital game industry. J Bus Res 78:341–352Google Scholar
  34. Ordanini A, Miceli L, Pizzetti M, Parasuraman A (2011) Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. J Serv Manag 22(4):443–470Google Scholar
  35. Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy—and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Qin Z, Deng X (2016) Government and family Guanxi in Chinese private firms: perceptions and preference. Rev Manag Sci 10(1):35–60Google Scholar
  37. Rey-Moreno M, Medina-Molina C (2016) Social capital in E-services adoption. Psychol Mark 33(12):1151–1158Google Scholar
  38. Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029Google Scholar
  39. Rogers E (1995) Diffusion of innovation. Free, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Roig-Tierno N, Kraus S, Cruz S (2018) The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci 12(2):379–383Google Scholar
  41. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78Google Scholar
  42. Shibchurn J, Yan X (2015) Information disclosure on social networking sites: an intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Comput Hum Behav 44:103–117Google Scholar
  43. Skirnevskiy V, Bendig D, Brettel M (2017) The influence of internal social capital on serial creators’ success in crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract 41(2):209–236Google Scholar
  44. Taüscher K (2018) When is business model innovation an effective platform strategy? Academy of management annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  45. Thies F, Huber A, Bock C, Benlian A, Kraus S (2018) Following the crowd—does crowdfunding affect venture capitalists’ selection of entrepreneurial ventures? J Small Bus Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12447) (in print) Google Scholar
  46. Turi AN, Domingo-Ferrer J, Sánchez D, Osmani D (2017) A co-utility approach to the mesh economy: the crowd-based business model. Rev Manag Sci 11:411–442Google Scholar
  47. Vilnai-Yavetz I, Levina O (2018) Motivating social sharing of e-business content: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, or crowding-out effect? Comput Hum Behav 79:181–191Google Scholar
  48. Zhang Y, Sun Y, Kim Y (2017) The influence of individual differences on consumer’s selection of online sources for health information. Comput Hum Behav 67:303–312Google Scholar
  49. Zhao Y, Zhu Q (2014) Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: current status and future direction. Inf Syst Front 16(3):417–434Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro Universitario San IsidoroSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Facultad Turismo y FinanzasUniversidad SevillaSevilleSpain
  3. 3.School of Economics and ManagementUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations