Abstract
Innovation can provide sustainable competitive advantages to service companies that consider the absorption of external knowledge a key strategic issue. Using the four dimensions of absorptive capacity, this study examined the impact of absorptive capacity on innovation in service delivery processes and explored how this innovation influences business performance. Structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) were applied to a sample of 134 companies drawn from the Colombian tourism sector. The results of the SEM indicate that innovation in service delivery processes is positively influenced by two of the four dimensions of absorptive capacity: knowledge transformation and knowledge exploitation. Also, innovation in service delivery processes encourages outstanding performance and mediates the relationship between absorptive capacity and business performance. These findings are supported by the results of the fsQCA. Furthermore, although the SEM results indicate that knowledge exploitation has the greatest direct influence on innovation, the fsQCA results suggest that knowledge assimilation and transformation are necessary conditions for companies to outperform competitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abecassis-Moedas C, Mahmoud-Jouini SB (2008) Absorptive capacity and source-recipient complementarity in designing new products: an empirically derived framework. J Prod Innov Manage 25:473–490
Aldebert B, Dang RJ, Longhi C (2011) Innovation in the tourism industry: the case of tourism. Tour Manage 32:1204–1213
Ali M, Kan KAS, Sarstedt M (2016) Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance. J Bus Res 69:5317–5323
Arshad AM, Su Q (2015) Interlinking service delivery innovation and service quality: a conceptual framework. J Appl Bus Res 31:1807
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16:74–94
Berry LL, Parish JT, Cadwallader S, Shankar V, Dotzel T (2006) Creating new markets through service innovation. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 47:56–63
Bruni DS, Verona G (2009) Dynamic marketing capabilities in science-based firms: an exploratory investigation of the pharmaceutical industry. Brit J Manage 20:S101–S117
Camisón C, Monfort-Mir VM (2012) Measuring innovation in tourism from the Schumpeterian and the dynamic-capabilities perspectives. Tour Manage 33:776–789
Cepeda-Carrion G, Cegarra-Navarro JG, Jiménez-Jiménez D (2012) The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: context and information systems capability as catalysts. Brit J Manage 23:110–129
Chesbrough H, Crowther AK (2006) Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Manage 36:229–236
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 99:569–596
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152
Elbaz AM, Agag GM, Alkathiri NA (2018) How ability, motivation and opportunity influence travel agents performance: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. J knowl Manag 22:119–141
Elliot T (2013) Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~sgsa/docs/fsQCA_thomas_elliot.pdf. Accessed July 2016
Engelman RM, Fracasso EM, Schnidt S, Zen AC (2017) Intellectual capital, absorptive capacity and product innovation. Manag Decis 55:474–490
Escribano A, Fosfuri A, Tribó JA (2009) Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Res Policy 38:96–105
Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad Manage J 54:393–420
Flatten T, Adams D, Brettel M (2015) Fostering absorptive capacity through leadership: a cross-cultural analysis. J World Bus 50:519–534
Forés B, Camisón C (2016) Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? J Bus Res 69:831–848
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50
Fosfuri A, Tribó JA (2008) Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega 36:173–187
Fraj E, Matute J, Melero I (2015) Environmental strategies and organizational competitiveness in the hotel industry: the role of learning and innovation as determinants of environmental success. Tour Manage 46:30–42
Fritsch M, Meschede M (2001) Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Rev Ind Organ 19:335–350
Govindarajan V, Kopalle PK (2006) Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strateg Manage J 27:189–199
Grissemann U, Plank A, Brunner-Sperdin A (2013) Enhancing business performance of hotels: the role of innovation and customer orientation. Int J Hosp Manag 33:347–356
Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Practice 19:137–149
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Haro-Domínguez MC, Arias-Aranda D, Llorens-Montes FJ, Ruiz-Moreno A (2007) The impact of absorptive capacity on technological acquisitions engineering consulting companies. Technovation 27:417–425
Harrington SJ, Guimaraes T (2005) Corporate culture, absorptive capacity and IT success. Inf Organ 15:39–63
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mark 20:277–320
Henseler J, Dijkstra TK, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Diamantopoulos A, Straub DW, Calantone RJ (2014) Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organ Res Methods 17:182–209
Hjalager AM (2002) Repairing innovation defectiveness in tourism. Tour Manage 23:465–474
Hjalager AM (2010) A review of innovation research in tourism. Tour Manage 31:1–12
Jansen J, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2005) Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Acad Manage J 48:999–1015
Koçoglu I, Akgün AE, Keskin H (2015) The differential relationship between absorptive capacity and product innovativeness: a theoretically derived framework. Int Bus Res 8:108–120
Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3:383–397
Kostopoulos K, Papalexandris A, Papachroni M, Ioannou G (2011) Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. J Bus Res 64:1335–1343
Kraus S, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Schüssler M (2018) Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research—the rise of a method. Int Entrep Manag J 14:15–33
Lichtenthaler U (2009) Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Acad Manage J 52:822–846
Liu X, Shen M, Ding W, Zhao X (2017) Tie strength, absorptive capacity and innovation performance in Chinese manufacturing industries. Nankai Bus Rev Int 8:475–494
Martinez-Roman JA, Tamayo JA, Gamero J, Romero JE (2015) Innovativeness and business performances in tourism SMEs. Ann Tour Res 54:118–135
Milwood P, Zach F (2016) Innovative Tourism Destinations: Collaboration Culture and Absorptive Capacity. Tourism Travel and Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally
Murovec N, Prodan I (2009) Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: cross cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation 29:859–872
Najda-Janoszka M, Kopera S (2014) Exploring barriers to innovation in tourism industry—the case of southern region of Poland. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 110:190–201
Nieto M, Quevedo P (2005) Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation 25:1141–1157
Nieves J, Quintana A, Osorio J (2014) Knowledge-based resources and innovation in the hotel industry. Int J Hosp Manag 38:65–73
Oecd E (2005) Oslo manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data
Ordanini A, Parasuraman A, Rubera G (2014) When the recipe is more important than the ingredients a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. J Serv Res 17:134–149
Pérez-Cabañero A, Cruz-Ros S, González-Cruz T (2015) The contribution of dynamic marketing capabilities to service innovation and performance. Int J Bus Environ 7:61–78
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903
Ragin CC (2000) Fuzzy-set social science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ragin CC (2006) Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and courage. Polit Anal 14:291–310
Ragin CC (2008a) Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In: Benoit R, Ragin C (eds) Configurational comparative analysis. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, pp 87–121
Ragin CC (2008b) Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Reinartz W, Krafft M, Hoyer WD (2004) The customer relationship management process: its measurement and impact on performance. J Mark Res 41:293–305
Reinartz WJ, Haenlein M, Henseler J (2009) An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance based and variance-based SEM. Int J of Res Mark 26:332–344
Ritala P, Kraus S, Bouncken RB (2016) Introduction to coopetition and innovation: contemporary topics and future research opportunities. J Technol Manage 71:1–9
Robertson PL, Casali GL, Jacobson D (2012) Managing open incremental process innovation: absorptive capacity and distributed learning. Res Policy 41:822–832
Rodriguez I, Williams AM, Hall CM (2014) Tourism innovation policy: implementation and outcomes. Ann Tour Res 49:76–93
Roig-Tierno N, Kraus S, Cruz S (2018) The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship. Rev Manag Sci 12:379–383
Sorescu AB, Chandy RK, Prabhu JC (2007) Why some acquisitions do better than others: product capital as a driver of long-term stock returns. J Mark Res 44:57–72
Tho ND, Trang NTM (2015) Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings. J Bus Res 68:1332–1340
Thomas R, Wood E (2014) Innovation in tourism: re-conceptualising and measuring the absorptive capacity of the hotel sector. Tour Manage 45:39–48
Thomas R, Wood E (2015) The absorptive capacity of tourism organisations. Ann Tour Res 54:84–99
Vega-Jurado J, Gutiérrez-Gracia A, Fernández-de-Lucio I (2008) Analyzing the determinants of firm’s absorptive capacity: beyond R&D. R&d Manage 38:392–405
Verma R, Jayasimha KR (2014) Service delivery innovation architecture: an empirical study of antecedents and outcomes. IIMB Manag Rev 26(2):105–121
Walker RM (2004) Innovation and organizational performance: evidence and a research agenda. In: Advanced institute of management research working paper series, 002 London, June
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27:185–203
Zhou KZ, Li CB (2012) How knowledge affects radical innovation: knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strateg Manage J 33:1090–1102
Zou T, Ertug G, George G (2018) The capacity to innovate: a meta-analysis of absorptive capacity. Innovation 20:87–121
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cruz-Ros, S., Guerrero-Sánchez, D.L. & Miquel-Romero, MJ. Absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation and performance: findings from SEM and fsQCA. Rev Manag Sci 15, 235–249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0319-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0319-7