Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

When and how often to externally commercialize technologies? a critical review of outbound open innovation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1990s, external technology commercialization (ETC) has become increasingly relevant in business management practice and the academic literature. Frequently, ETC is praised as highly important and is often even considered an important competence of a progressive firm. To date, research has mainly focused on the opportunities and advantages of ETC, while risks and costs tend to be ignored or downplayed. This paper aims to review ETC critically. We stress that ETC might not only cause operating costs but also requires additional human resources. From a strategic perspective, we propose that ETC may result in the loss of competitive advantages through the disclosure of internal knowledge (or areas the firm is working in) or through the suboptimal allocation of R&D resources, and thereby affects a firm’s performance negatively. Finally, we propose specific implications for management and research on when and how often companies should practice ETC, and illustrate related practical experience by a case study. We thereby propose an inversely U-shaped relationship between ETC’s intensity and the firm’s profit contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arzubiaga U, Maseda A, Iturralde T (2017) Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management. Rev Manag Sci. (forthcoming)

  • Bianchi M, Chiaroni D, Chiesa V, Frattini F (2011) Organizing for external technology commercialization: evidence from a multiple case study in the pharmaceutical industry. R&D Manag 41:120–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkenmeier B (2003) External deployment of technologies. Technology and Innovation Management on the move. Tschirky Verlag Industrielle Organisation, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken RB, Plüschke BD, Pesch R, Kraus S (2016) Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies. Rev Manag Sci 10:381–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman B, Valentini G (2016) Open Innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strateg Manag J 37:1034–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Dowling M, Helm R (2011) Licencing as a commercialisation strategy under different institutional contexts: a comparative empirical analysis of German and Chinese biotechnology firms. Int J Bus Glob 7:131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C, Huizingh E (2014) When is open innovation beneficial? the role of strategic orientation. J Prod Innov Manag 31:1235–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2003a) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard University Press, Boston and Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2003b) The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 44:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2007) Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2011) Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Brunswicker S (2014) A fad or a phenomenon? the adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Res Technol Manage 57:16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Crowther A (2006) Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Manag 36:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Garman A (2009) How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. Harvard Bus Rev 87:68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG, Edgett SJ (2010) Developing a product innovation and technology strategy for your business. Res Technol Manag 53:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander L, Gann D (2010) How open is innovation? Res Policy 39:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling M, Helm R (2006) Product development success through cooperation: a study of entrepreneurial firms. Technovation 26:483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling M, Helm R (2008) Licensing as a commercialisation strategy: an empirical analysis of german biotechnology firms. Manag Innov Entrep 4:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling M, Hüsig S (2002) Technologiestrategie. In: Specht D, Möhrle MG (eds) Gabler Lexikon Technologie Management—Management von Innovationen und neuen Technologien im Unternehmen. Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler GmbH, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M, Lyles M, Tsang E (2008) Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: current themes and future prospects. J Manag Stud 45:677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H (2009) Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faems D, de Visser M, Andries P, Van Looy B (2010) Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 27:785–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford D (1985) The management and marketing of technology. In: Lamb R, Shrivastava P (eds) Advances in strategic management. JAI Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosfuri A (2006) The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strateg Manag J 27:1141–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frishammar J, Ericsson K, Patel P (2015) The dark side of knowledge transfer: exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects. Technovation 41–42:75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltanalyse, 4th edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gleave S, Feess E (2016) Fixed fee licensing for cost-reducing technologies: Should innovators reveal their private information? Rev Manag Sci 10:778–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O (2000) Corporate innovation systems: a comparative study of multi-technology corporations in Japan, Sweden and the USA. Chalmers University, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm R, Kloyer M (2004) Controlling contractual exchange risks in R&D interfirm cooperation: an empirical Study. Res Policy 33:1103–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizingh E (2011) Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung K, Chou C (2013) The impact of open innovation on firm performance: the moderating effects of internal F&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation 33:368–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüsig S (2006) Institutionalisierte Vorentwicklung für radikale Innovationen—Dargestellt am Beispiel der Mannesmann Pilotentwicklung und der LKW-Mauttechnik. Duisburg: WiKu-Verlag—Verlag für Wissenschaft und Kultur

  • ideaCONNECTION (2017). http://www.ideaconnection.com. Accessed 10th July 2017

  • Inauen M, Schenker-Wicki A (2011) The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance. Eur J Innov Manag 14:496–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INNOCENTIVE (2017). http://www.innocentive.com. Accessed 10th July 2017

  • Kale P, Dyer J, Singh H (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strateg Manag J 23:747–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H-S, Choi S-Y (2014) Technological alliance portfolio configuration and firm performance. Rev Manag Sci 8:541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline D (2003) Sharing the corporate crown jewels. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 44:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloyer M, Helm R, Burr W (2007) Compensation preferences of R&D-suppliers: some empirical results. Int J Technol Manag 40:371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koruna S (2004) External technology commercialization—policy guidelines. Int J Technol Manag 27:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanxess AG Firm Website (2017). http://www.lanxess.com/en/corporate/home/. Accessed 5th July 2017

  • Latham G, Locke E (2006) Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting. Org Dyn 35:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for Innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K, Salter A (2014) The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration. Res Policy 43:867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U (2006) Leveraging knowledge assets: success factors of external technology commercialization. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U (2007) Understanding the determinants of external technology commercialization. In: Ernst H, Gemünden HG (eds) Open innovation between and within organizations. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft Special Issue 4:21–45

  • Lichtenthaler U (2009) Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences. R&D Manag 39:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U (2010) Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: finding the right ‘job’ for your technology. Technovation 30:429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U (2015) A note on outbound open innovation and firm performance. R&D Manag 45:606–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U, Ernst H (2007) External technology commercialization in large firms: results of a quantitative benchmarking study. R&D Manag 37:383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manag 34:375–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell R (1992) Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Manag 22:221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scapens RW (2004) Doing case study research. In: Humphrey C, Lee B (eds) The real life guide to accounting research. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 257–279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stüer C, Hüsig S, Biala S (2010) How to create and sustain an open and radical innovation capability in the fuzzy front end? the case of vodafone R&D Germany and selected ongoing radical innovation projects. Int J Prod Dev 11:196–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TOP 100 Award Website (2013). Top 100 German most innovative small and medium-sized firms 2013, http://www.top100-germany.com. Accessed 16th September 2016

  • Trott P, Hartmann D (2009) Why “Open Innovation” is old wine in new Bottles. Int J Technol Manag 13:715–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschirky H, Koruna S, Lichtenthaler E (2004) Technology marketing: A firm’s core competence? Int J Technol Manag 27:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel E (1986) Lead users. A source of novel product concepts. Manag Sci 32:791–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Manag 36:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1994) Revolution der Produktentwicklung: Spitzenleistungen in Schnelligkeit, Effizienz und Qualität durch dynamische Teams. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O (1973) Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations. Am Econ Rev 63:316–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (2009) Case study research—design and methods, vol 5. Applied social research methods series. Thousand Oaks, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook C, Allen J (2013) Profit from the core: a return to growth in turbulent times. Harvard Business Press, Boston and Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of Strategic Industrial Marketing, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Roland Helm & Herbert Endres

  2. Chair of Innovation Research and Technology Management, Chemnitz University of Technology, Thüringer Weg 7, 09111, Chemnitz, Germany

    Stefan Hüsig

Authors
  1. Roland Helm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Herbert Endres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Hüsig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Helm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helm, R., Endres, H. & Hüsig, S. When and how often to externally commercialize technologies? a critical review of outbound open innovation. Rev Manag Sci 13, 327–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0248-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0248-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation