Despite its clinical utility, progressive reliance on imaging technology can lead to devaluing the physical examination in patients with chronic pain. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether chronic pain patients have a positive or negative perception of the physical examination.
After institutional ethics committee approval, 120 adult patients as a convenience sample who attended a chronic pain clinic were included. Participants completed a 10-item survey regarding their overall perception of the physical examination. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test analyses were conducted to explore associations between test items and patient ages, gender, employment, pain diagnosis, and duration of pain. All cross-tabulations of categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test for associations.
The majority of participants were male (51%), aged 50–70 (44%). The most common pain diagnosis was back pain (62%). Most patients (77%) indicated that the overall experience of being examined was highly positive. Patients believe in the value of the physical examination as a diagnostic tool (97%). Patients believe in the relational value of the physical examination (92%). Age, gender, employment, pain diagnosis, and duration of pain were not associated with a more positive perception of the physical examination.
Patients with chronic pain indicate that the physical examination is a highly positive aspect of their care. There are some negative aspects of been examined which physicians should be aware of. This study adds to our knowledge regarding the physical exam in chronic pain patients. It will inform practice and training.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Fitzgerald FT (1990) Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review. West J Med 152:377–382
Verghese A, Horwitz RI (2009) In praise of the physical examination [serial online]. BMJ 339:b5448
Oboler SK, Prochazka AV, Gonzales R et al (2002) Public expectations and attitudes for annual physical examinations and testing. Ann Intern Med 136:652–659
Kravitz RL, Cope DW, Bhrany V, Leake B (1994) Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits. J Gen Intern Med 9:75–81
Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE et al (1989) The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care 27:1027–1035
Kravitz RL, Bell RA, Azari R et al (2002) Request fulfillment in office practice: antecedents and relationship to outcomes. Med Care 40:38–51
Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ (2000) Patients’ perceptions of omitted examinations and tests: a qualitative analysis. J Gen Intern Med 15:38–45
Lillrank A (2003) Back pain and the resolution of diagnostic uncertainty in illness narratives. Soc Sci Med 57(6):1045–1054
Kenny DT (2004) Constructions of chronic pain in doctor-patient relationships: bridging the communication chasm. Patient Educ Couns 52(3):297–305
Crofford LJ (2015) Psychological aspects of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 29(1):147–155
Atkinson S, Macnaughton J, Saunders C, Evans M (2010) Cool intimacies of care for contemporary clinical practice. Lancet 376:1732–1733
Pohl G, Seemann H, Zojer N et al (2007) “Laying on of hands” improves well-being in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 15:143–151
Kadakia KC, Hui D, Chisholm GB et al (2014) Cancer patients' perceptions regarding the value of the physical examination: a survey study. Cancer 120(14):2215–2221
McNaughton DT, Hush JM, Beath AP et al (2018) No moderating impact of a medically unexplained etiology on the relationship between psychological profile and chronic pain. J Psychosom Res 115:87–93
Battalio SL, Glette M, Alschuler KN, Jensen MP (2018) Anxiety, depression, and function in individuals with chronic physical conditions: a longitudinal analysis. Rehabil Psychol 63(4):532–541
Elkiss ML, Jerome JA (2012) Touch—more than a basic science. J Am Osteopath Assoc 112:514–517
Howe CQ, Robinson JP, Sullivan MD (2015) Psychiatric and psychological perspectives on chronic pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 26(2):283–300
Phillips LA, Carroll LJ, Voaklander DC et al (2012) Pain coping in injured workers with chronic pain: what’s unique about workers? Disabil Rehabil 34(21):1774–1782
The Institutional Research and Ethics Committee of the University Hospitals Limerick, Ireland, approved all study procedures.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Hashim, M.M., Edgeworth, D.M., Saunders, J.A. et al. Patient’s perceptions of physical examination in the setting of chronic pain. Ir J Med Sci 190, 313–316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02250-2
- Chronic pain
- Patient satisfaction
- Physical examination