Financial impact of inaccurate Adverse Event recording post Hip Fracture surgery: Addendum to 'Adverse event recording post hip fracture surgery'
- 37 Downloads
A study in 2011 by (Doody et al. Ir Med J 106(10):300–302, 2013) looked at comparing inpatient adverse events recorded prospectively at the point of care, with adverse events recorded by the national Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) System.
In the study, a single-centre University Hospital in Ireland treating acute hip fractures in an orthopaedic unit recorded 39 patients over a 2-month (August–September 2011) period, with 55 adverse events recorded prospectively in contrast to the HIPE record of 13 (23.6%) adverse events. With the recent change in the Irish hospital funding model from block grant to an ‘activity-based funding’ on the basis of case load and case complexity, the hospital financial allocation is dependent on accurate case complexity coding. A retrospective assessment of the financial implications of the two methods of adverse incident recording was carried out.
A total of €39,899 in ‘missed funding’ for 2 months was calculated when the ward-based, prospectively collected data was compared to the national HIPE data. Accurate data collection is paramount in facilitating activity-based funding, to improve patient care and ensure the appropriate allocation of resources.
KeywordsCost Data quality Financial Health policy Hip fracture HIPE
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Health Service Executive Ireland (2015) Irish Hip Fracture Database. Annual Report. Website accessed July 2017. https://www.noca.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/NOCA-IHFD-National-Report-2015-FINAL.pdf
- 2.Health Service Executive Ireland (2015) Activity Based Funding Programme. Implementation Plan 2015–2017Google Scholar
- 3.Health Service Executive Ireland (2015) Healthcare pricing office reportGoogle Scholar
- 4.von Friesendorff M et al (2016) Hip fracture, mortality risk, and cause of death over two decades. Osteoporos Int:1–9Google Scholar
- 6.Royal College of Physicians (2015) United Kingdom National Hip Fracture Data Base. Annual Report. National Health ServiceGoogle Scholar
- 7.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2011) The management of hip fracture in adults. Clinical guideline (CG124). 24/07/2016; Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124
- 8.Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (2016) Health Care Pricing Office. Available from: https://www.hiqa.ie/healthcare/health-information/data-collections/online-catalogue/hospital-patient-enquiry
- 11.Blunt I, Bardsley M (2012) Use of patient level costing to increase efficiency in NHS TrustsGoogle Scholar
- 12.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012) Hip fracture quality standard (QS16). 24/07/2016; Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs16
- 13.British Orthopaedic Association (2007) The Care of Patients with Fragility FractureGoogle Scholar