Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sumatra’s Rubber Agroforests: Advent, Rise and Fall of a Sustainable Cropping System

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until the end of the nineteenth century primary forests covered nearly all the island of Sumatra. The first valorisation of this natural resource was hunting and gathering activities, followed by and later associated with swidden cultivation of upland rice. The industrial revolution in Europe and North America in the 1950s created increasing demand for rubber. Answering this new market opportunity, farmers introduced rubber seedlings in their swiddens amidst the upland rice. By doing so, they invented a new cropping system, i.e. rubber agroforests. Thanks to the continuously increasing demand for rubber by the developing industry, rubber agroforests spread over Sumatra’s eastern peneplains until the 1990s. Forest conversion to rubber agroforests conserves a high level of forest biodiversity and the agroforests act as a buffer zone around national parks. But with growing demographic pressure, market integration and household monetary needs, agroforests are increasingly endangered. New cropping systems have appeared and challenge agroforests’ dominance in the landscape. Since the mid-twentieth century, rubber monospecific plantations have been competing for land, with an undoubtedly higher profitability than agroforests. More recently, oil palm plantations have spread over the island, quickly becoming the new challenger to rubber agroforestry. Nevertheless, the international community shows more and more interest in forest and biodiversity conservation. Forest cover in Jambi province has nearly disappeared over the past 30 years. The only way to save the remnants of forests and agroforests seems to be the creation of market incentives through conservation programs such as reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelsen A (ed) (2008) Moving ahead with REDD; issues, options and implications. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley R, Russel D, Shallow B (2006) The policy terrain in protected area landscapes: challenges for agroforestry in integrated landscape conservation. Biodivers Conserv 15(2):663–689. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-2100-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptative management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1251–1262. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beukema H, Danielsen F, Vincent G, Hardiwinoto S, Andel J (2007) Plant and bird diversity in rubber agroforests in the lowlands of Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 70(3):217–242. doi:10.1007/s10457-007-9037-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson A (2000) The hesitant boom: Indonesia’s oil palm sub-sector in an era of economic crisis and political change. In: CIFOR (ed) Occasional paper 29, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Chambon B (2001) De l’innovation technique dans les sociétés paysannes: la diffusion de la monoculture clonale d’hévéa à Kalimantan Ouest (Indonésie). Doctoral diss., Université Montpellier I, Montpellier, France

  • Colfer CJP, Resosudarmo IAP (eds) (2002) Which way forward? People, forests, and policymaking in Indonesia. Resources for the future. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (Singapore), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham A, Belcher B, Campbell B (eds) (2005) Carving out a future: forests, livelihoods and the international woodcarving trade. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Foresta H (2008) Forêts et foresteries dans les regions tropicales. In: Hallé F, Lieutaghi P (eds) Aux origins des plantes, vol 2. Editions Fayard, Paris, pp 138–155

    Google Scholar 

  • De Koninck R (2005) L’Asie du Sud-Est, 2nd edn. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove MR (1994) Transition from native forest rubbers to Hevea brasiliensis (Euphorbiaceae) among tribal smallholders in Borneo. Econ Bot 48(4):382–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekadinata A, Vincent G (2004) Assessing landcover dynamics in Bungo district, Jambi, using multitemporal satellite imagery. SAU Working Document, vol 12, pp 1–29

  • FAO (2008) FAOSTAT online statistical service. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed December 2008

  • Gadgil M, Olsson P, Berkes F, Folke C (2003) Exploring the role of local ecological knowledge for ecosystem management: three case studies. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouyon A (1995) Paysannerie et hévéaculture dans les plaines orientales de Sumatra: quel avenir pour un système agroforestier. Doctoral diss., Institut National d’Agronomie Paris-Grignon, Paris

  • Gouyon A, De Foresta H, Levang P (1993) Does jungle rubber deserve its name? An analysis of rubber agroforestry systems in southeast Sumatra. Agrofor Syst 22(3):181–206. doi:10.1007/BF00705233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley PA (1999) Tropical agroforestry. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi L et al (2002) Jungle rubber: a traditional agroforestry system under pressure. ICRAF, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Fèvre G (1927) L’épopée du caoutchouc. Stock, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Levang P (1991) Les agroforêts indonésiennes, contribution de l’agro-économiste. In: IRD (ed) Communication à l’atelier agroforesterie. IRD, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Levang P (1997) La terre d’en face: la transmigration en Indonésie. Editions de l’ORSTOM, Montpellier

  • Levang P, Gouyon A (1993) De la retouche à la rupture: l’introduction de l’hévéa dans les systèmes de riziculture sur brûlis à Sumatra. Séminaire sur “Innovations et sociétés”. IRD, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Levang P, Sitorus S (2006) Rubber smallholders versus acacia growers: socio-economic survey of the Rambang Dangku sub-district (South Sumatra). IRD-CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Levang P, Michon G, de Foresta H (1997) Agriculture forestière ou agroforesterie? Bois Forets Tropiques 251(1):29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G (2005) Domesticating forests: how farmers manage forest resources. IRD, CIFOR, ICRAF, Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G, Bompard J-M (1987) Agroforesteries indonésiennes: contributions paysannes à la conservation des forêts naturelles et de leurs ressources. Rev Ecol (Terre Vie) 42(1):3–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G, De Foresta H (1997) Agroforests: pre-domestication of forest trees or true domestication of forest ecosystems? Neth J Agric Sci 45(4):451–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G, Mary F, Bompard J-M (1986) Multistoried agroforestry garden system in west Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 4:315–338. doi:10.1007/BF00048106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michon G, De Foresta H, Levang P (1995) Stratégies agroforestières paysannes et développement durable: les agroforêts à damar de Sumatra. Natures Sci Soc 3(3):207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurrochmat DR (2005) The impacts of regional autonomy on political dynamics, socio-economics and forest degradation: case of Jambi, Indonesia. Doctoral thesis, Goettingen University, Germany

  • Penot E (2001) Stratégies paysannes et évolution des savoirs: l’hévéaculture agroforestière indonésienne. Doctoral diss., Université Montpellier I, Montpellier, France

  • Rasnovi S (2006) Ekologi regenerasi tumbuhan berkayu pada system agroforest karet. Doctoral thesis, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Ruf F, Lançon F (eds) (2004) From slash and burn to replanting: green revolutions in the Indonesian uplands. The World Bank, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Perez M et al (2004) Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecol Soc 9(2):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandker M, Suwarno A, Campbell BM (2007) Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 13(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiollay J-M (1995) The role of traditional agroforests in the conservation of rain forest bird diversity in Sumatra. Conserv Biol 9(2):335–353. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9020335.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomich TP, Thomas DE, Van Noordwijk M (2004) Environmental services and land use change: bridging the gap between policy and research in Southeast Asia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(1):229–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the project Integrating Livelihoods and Multiple Biodiversity Values in Landscape Mosaics, a joint research project of the Center for International Forestry Research and the World Agroforestry Centre, with support from the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurène Feintrenie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feintrenie, L., Levang, P. Sumatra’s Rubber Agroforests: Advent, Rise and Fall of a Sustainable Cropping System. Small-scale Forestry 8, 323–335 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9086-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9086-2

Keywords

Navigation