Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Remediating Effects of Peat, Sawdust, and Gypsum in Alkaline Bauxite Residue Based on Orthogonal Experiments

  • Aluminum: Recycling and Environmental Footprint
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An optimization study has been carried out on remediation of alkaline bauxite residue (ABR) using peat, sawdust, and gypsum. The results for the tolerance index (TI) and analysis of variance revealed that the order of effective amendments for ABR revegetation was gypsum > peat > sawdust. Gypsum and peat were statistically inferred to have significant influences on the TI of Atriplex canescens due to their capability to reduce pH, paste extract aluminum, and exchangeable sodium percentage. Peat treatment increased the richness of the rhizosphere-associated microbial community, which may benefit plant–microbe interactions and contribute to Atriplex growth promotion. The optimum operating condition identified by the orthogonal experimental design was the combination of 14% peat, 15% gypsum, and 8% sawdust. Application of the gypsum and peat combination holds great potential to enhance ABR remediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Wang and D.Y. Liu, Materials 5, 1800 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Xue, Y. Wu, Y. Li, X. Kong, F. Zhu, H. William, X. Li, Y. Ye, and J. Cent, South Univ. 26, 268 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Zhu, S. Xue, W. Hartley, L. Huang, C. Wu, and X. Li, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 2856 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Eastham, T. Morald, and P. Aylmore, Water Air Soil Pollut. 176, 5 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Courtney, T. Harrington, and K.A. Byrne, Ecol. Eng. 58, 63 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Chauhan and A. Ganguly, Ecol. Eng. 37, 504 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.B. Wehr, I. Fulton, and N.W. Menzies, Environ. Manag. 37, 297 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Gautam, D. Pandey, and M. Agrawal, Int. J. Phytoremediat. 19, 555 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B.E.H. Jones and R.J. Haynes, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 271 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T.C. Santini and N.C. Banning, Hydrometallurgy 164, 38 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.B. Goloran, I.R. Phillips, Z.H. Xu, L.M. Condron, and C.R. Chen, Soil Use Manag. 30, 198 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.G. Courtney and J.P. Timpson, Plant Soil 266, 187 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N.W. Menzies, I.M. Fulton, and W.J. Morrell, J. Environ. Qual. 33, 1877 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M.J. Gherardi and Z. Rengel, Plant Soil 257, 85 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.G. Courtney and J.P. Timpson, Water Air Soil Pollut. 164, 91 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.A. Ojekanmi and S.X. Chang, J. Environ. Qual. 43, 1566 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Liu, J. Yang, and B. Xiao, Int. J. Miner. Process. 93, 220 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W.L. Daniels, G.K. Evanylo, S.M. Nagle and J.M. Schmidt, in Proceedings 18th National Meeting of the American Society for Surface Mining and Reclamation 3 (2001)

  19. M.E. Voorhees, Reclam. Reveg. Res. 5, 483 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Gräfe and C. Klauber, Hydrometallurgy 108, 46 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H.I. Gomes, W.M. Mayes, M. Rogerson, D.I. Stewart, and I.T. Burked, J. Clean. Prod. 112, 3571 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Shi, Y. Qu, and H. Li, Ecol. Eng. 98, 166 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J.W.C. Wong and G.E. Ho, Waste Manag. Res. 11, 249 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.M.N. Alla, A.H.A. Khedr, M.M. Serag, A.Z. Abu-Alnaga, and R.M. Nada, Acta Physiol. Plant. 33, 547 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D.J. Walker and S. Lutts, Emir. J. Food. Agric. 26, 1081 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Qiu, F. Zhou, Y. Wang, X. Peng, and C. Hua, Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 61, 238 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M.M.N. Alla, A.A. Khedr, M.M. Serag, A.Z. Abu-Alnaga, and R.M. Nada, Plant Growth Regul. 67, 281 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H.J. Woodard, L. Hossner, and J. Bush, J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part A 43, 1157 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A.V. Geramita, J.M. Geramita, and J.S. Wallis, Linear Multilinear Algebr. 3, 281 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D.A. Wilkins, New Phytol. 80, 623 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Fierer, J.A. Jackson, R. Vilgalys, and R.B. Jackson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4117 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Courtney and T. Harrington, Land Degrad. Dev. 23, 144 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R.D. Fuller, E.D.P. Nelson, and C.J. Richardson, J. Environ. Qual. 11, 533 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A.I. Pogue and W.J. Lukiw, Front. Neurol. 5, 262 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Schmitt, T. Watanabe, and S. Jansen, AoB Plants 8, plw065 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. S. Singh, D.K. Tripathi, S. Singh, S. Sharma, N.K. Dubey, D.K. Chauhan, and M. Vaculík, Environ. Exp. Bot. 137, 177 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Courtney and L. Kirwan, Ecol. Eng. 42, 279 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R. Courtney, E. Di Carlo, and O. Schmidt, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 1, 1 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. CHALCO (Aluminum Corporation of China Limited)., & BGRIMM (Beijing General Research Institute of Mining & Metallurgy). China Invention Patent, No. 200510018271.0, 2005

  40. J. Fortin and A. Karam, Int. J. Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 12, 105 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. C. Thiyagarajan, R.W. Bell, J. Anderson, and I.R. Phillips, Soil Res. 50, 416 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Courtney and G. Mullen, Water Air Soil Pollut. 197, 15 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R.M. Niemi, M. Vepsäläinen, K. Wallenius, K. Erkomaa, S. Kukkonen, A. Palojärvi, and M. Vestberg, Eur. J. Soil Biol. 44, 419 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. M. Vepsäläinen, K. Erkomaa, S. Kukkonen, M. Vestberg, K. Wallenius, and R.M. Niemi, Plant Soil 264, 273 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. B.E.H. Jones, R.J. Haynes, and I.R. Phillips, J. Environ. Manag. 91, 2281 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Xue, F. Zhu, X. Kong, C. Wu, L. Huang, N. Huang, and W. Hartley, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 1120 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. O.M. Finkel, G. Castrillo, S. Herrera Paredes, I. Salas González, and J.L. Dangl, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 38, 155 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Goswami, J.N. Thakker, and P.C. Dhandhukia, Cogent Food Agric. 2, 1127500 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. Schmalenberger, O. O’Sullivan, J. Gahan, P.D. Cotter, and R. Courtney, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 7110 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Courtney, J.A. Harris, and M. Pawlett, Restor. Ecol. 22, 798 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. M. Benzarti, K. Ben Rejeb, A. Debez, and C. Abdelly, Crop Improv. (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2013), pp. 441–457

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Education Department of Henan (15A180049) and Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology (2014BZ07). The authors extend their appreciation to China Aluminium Limited for providing alkaline bauxite residue.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Shi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, B., Liu, X., Deng, H. et al. Analysis of Remediating Effects of Peat, Sawdust, and Gypsum in Alkaline Bauxite Residue Based on Orthogonal Experiments. JOM 71, 2952–2958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03593-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03593-7

Navigation