Multi-objective truss optimisation is a research topic that has been less investigated in the literature compared to the single-objective cases. This paper investigates the comparative performance of fourteen new and established multi-objective metaheuristics when solving truss optimisation problems. The optimisers include multi-objective ant lion optimiser, multi-objective dragonfly algorithm, multi-objective grasshopper optimisation algorithm, multi-objective grey wolf optimiser, multi-objective multi-verse optimisation, multi-objective water cycle algorithm, multi-objective Salp swarm algorithm, success history-based adaptive multi-objective differential evolution, success history–based adaptive multi-objective differential evolution with whale optimisation, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II, hybridisation of real-code population-based incremental learning and differential evolution, differential evolution for multi-objective optimisation, multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, and unrestricted population size evolutionary multi-objective optimisation algorithm. The design problem is assigned to minimise structural mass and compliance subject to stress constraints. Eight classical trusses found in the literature are used for setting up the design test problems. Various optimisers are then implemented to tackle the problems. A comprehensive comparative study is given to critically analyse the performance of all algorithms in this problem area. The results provide new insights to the pros and cons of evolutionary multi-objective optimisation algorithms when addressing multiple, often conflicting objective in truss optimisation. The results and findings of this work assist with not only solving truss optimisation problem better but also designing customised algorithms for such problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and materials
The test data, test problems’ details, and optimisation parameters settings can be found in https://github.com/Natee-Panagant/Comparative-study-of-truss-sizing-optimisation-problems-in-MATLAB/.
All the implemented MATLAB codes are available in https://github.com/Natee-Panagant/Comparative-study-of-truss-sizing-optimisation-problems-in-MATLAB/.
Pholdee N, Bureerat S, Jaroenapibal P, Radpukdee T (2017) Many-objective optimisation of trusses through meta-heuristics. In: Advances in neural networks—ISNN 2017, Cham, pp 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59072-1_18
Yildiz AR, Abderazek H, Mirjalili S (2019) A comparative study of recent non-traditional methods for mechanical design optimization. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x
Xia L, Xia Q, Huang X, Xie YM (2018) Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: a comprehensive review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25(2):437–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9203-2
Patel VK, Raja BD (2020) Comparative performance of recent advanced optimization algorithms for minimum energy requirement solutions in water pump switching network. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09429-x
Rao RV, Saroj A, Ocloń P, Taler J (2020) Design optimization of heat exchangers with advanced optimization techniques: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 27(2):517–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09318-y
Greiner D, Periaux J, Emperador JM, Galván B, Winter G (2017) Game theory based evolutionary algorithms: a review with Nash applications in structural engineering optimization problems. Arch Comput Methods Eng 24(4):703–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9187-y
Tang Z, Hu X, Périaux J (2019) Multi-level hybridized optimization methods coupling local search deterministic and global search evolutionary algorithms. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09336-w
Abualigah L, Shehab M, Alshinwan M, Mirjalili S, Elaziz MA (2020) Ant lion optimizer: a comprehensive survey of its variants and applications. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09420-6
Noilublao N, Bureerat S (2011) Simultaneous topology, shape and sizing optimisation of a three-dimensional slender truss tower using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Comput Struct 89(23):2531–2538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.010
Ohsaki M (1995) Genetic algorithm for topology optimization of trusses. Comput Struct 57(2):219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)00617-C
Hajela P, Lee E (1995) Genetic algorithms in truss topological optimization. Int J Solids Struct 32(22):3341–3357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)00306-H
Chen G-S, Bruno RJ, Salama M (1991) Optimal placement of active/passive members in truss structures using simulated annealing. AIAA J 29(8):1327–1334. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10739
Schutte JF, Groenwold AA (2003) Sizing design of truss structures using particle swarms. Struct Multidisc Optim 25(4):261–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0316-5
Wu C-Y, Tseng K-Y (2010) Truss structure optimization using adaptive multi-population differential evolution. Struct Multidisc Optim 42(4):575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0507-9
Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK, Bureerat S (2017) Topology, shape, and size optimization of truss structures using modified teaching-learning based optimization. Adv Comput Des 2(4):313–331
Sonmez M (2011) Artificial Bee Colony algorithm for optimization of truss structures. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):2406–2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.09.003
Kaveh A, Ahmadi B (2014) Sizing, geometry and topology optimization of trusses using force method and supervised charged system search. Struct Eng Mech 50(3): 365–382
Lieu QX, Do DTT, Lee J (2018) An adaptive hybrid evolutionary firefly algorithm for shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints. Comput Struct 195:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.06.016
Kaveh A, Dadras A, Montazeran AH (2018) Chaotic enhanced colliding bodies algorithms for size optimization of truss structures. Acta Mech 229(7):2883–2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-018-2149-8
Yancang L, Zhen Y (2019) Application of improved bat algorithm in truss optimization. KSCE J Civ Eng 23(6):2636–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-2119-2
Gandomi AH, Talatahari S, Tadbiri F, Alavi AH (2013) Krill herd algorithm for optimum design of truss structures. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 5(5):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2013.057191
Kaveh A, Khayatazad M (2013) Ray optimization for size and shape optimization of truss structures. Comput Struct 117:82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.010
Tejani GG, Pholdee N, Bureerat S, Prayogo D, Gandomi AH (2019) Structural optimization using multi-objective modified adaptive symbiotic organisms search. Expert Syst Appl 125:425–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.068
Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Bureerat S, Patel VK, Savsani P (2019) Topology optimization of truss subjected to static and dynamic constraints by integrating simulated annealing into passing vehicle search algorithms. Eng Comput 35(2):499–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0612-8
Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2018) A comparative study of eighteen self-adaptive metaheuristic algorithms for truss sizing optimisation. KSCE J Civ Eng 22(8):2982–2993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0095-y
Greiner D, Hajela P (2012) Truss topology optimization for mass and reliability considerations—co-evolutionary multiobjective formulations. Struct Multidisc Optim 45(4):589–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0709-9
Techasen T, Wansasueb K, Panagant N, Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2019) Simultaneous topology, shape, and size optimization of trusses, taking account of uncertainties using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Eng Compu 35(2):721–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0629-z
Panagant N, Bureerat S, Tai K (2019) A novel self-adaptive hybrid multi-objective meta-heuristic for reliability design of trusses with simultaneous topology, shape and sizing optimisation design variables. Struct Multidisc Optim 60(5):1937–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02302-x
Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2012) Performance enhancement of multiobjective evolutionary optimisers for truss design using an approximate gradient. Comput Struct 106–107:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.04.015
Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2013) Hybridisation of real-code population-based incremental learning and differential evolution for multiobjective design of trusses. Inf Sci 223:136–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.008
Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2014) Hybrid real-code population-based incremental learning and approximate gradients for multi-objective truss design. Eng Optim 46(8):1032–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2013.823194
Tejani GG, Pholdee N, Bureerat S, Prayogo D (2018) Multiobjective adaptive symbiotic organisms search for truss optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 161:398–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.005
Kumar S, Tejani GG, Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2020) Multi-objective modified heat transfer search for truss optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01010-1
Mirjalili S, Jangir P, Saremi S (2017) Multi-objective ant lion optimizer: a multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems. Appl Intell 46(1):79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0825-8
Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1
Mirjalili SZ, Mirjalili S, Saremi S, Faris H, Aljarah I (2018) Grasshopper optimization algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Appl Intell 48(4):805–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1019-8
Mirjalili S, Saremi S, Mirjalili SM, dos Coelho LS (2016) Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: a novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization. Expert Syst Appl 47:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.039
Mirjalili S, Jangir P, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Trivedi IN (2017) Optimization of problems with multiple objectives using the multi-verse optimization algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 134:50–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.07.018
Sadollah A, Eskandar H, Kim JH (2015) Water cycle algorithm for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 27:279–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.042
Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp Swarm Algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.002
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
Robič T, Filipič B (2005) DEMO: differential evolution for multiobjective optimization. In: Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, pp 520–533
Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(6):712–731
Aittokoski T, Miettinen K (2010) Efficient evolutionary approach to approximate the Pareto-optimal set in multiobjective optimization, UPS-EMOA. Optim Methods Softw 25(6):841–858
Veldhuizen DAV, Lamont GB (2000) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evol Comput 8(2):125–147. https://doi.org/10.1162/106365600568158
Sierra MR, Coello Coello CA (2005) Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and ∈-dominance. In: Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, Berlin, pp 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_35
Sujin, Natee, and Nantiwat have financial support from the Thailand Research Fund (RTA6180010).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this paper.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Panagant, N., Pholdee, N., Bureerat, S. et al. A Comparative Study of Recent Multi-objective Metaheuristics for Solving Constrained Truss Optimisation Problems. Arch Computat Methods Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09531-8