Invasive interactions: can Argentine ants indirectly increase the reproductive output of a weed?
- 377 Downloads
The direct and indirect interactions of invasive ants with plants, insect herbivores, and Hemiptera are complex. While ant and Hemiptera interactions with native plants have been well studied, the effects of invasive ant–scale insect mutualisms on the reproductive output of invasive weeds have not. The study system consisted of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile), boneseed (Chrysanthemoides monilifera monilifera), and sap-sucking scale insects (Hemiptera: Saissetia oleae and Parasaissetia nigra), all of which are invasive in New Zealand. We examined the direct and indirect effects of Argentine ants on scale insects and other invertebrates (especially herbivores) and on plant reproductive output. Argentine ants spent one-third of their time specifically associated with scale insects in tending behaviours. The invertebrate community was significantly different between uninfested and infested plants, with fewer predators and herbivores on ant-infested plants. Herbivore damage was significantly reduced on plants with Argentine ants, but sooty mould colonisation was greater where ants were present. Herbivore damage increased when ants were excluded from plants. Boneseed plants infested with Argentine ants produced significantly more fruits than plants without ants. The increase in reproductive output in the presence of ants may be due to increased pollination as the result of pollinators being forced to relocate frequently to avoid attack by ants, resulting in an increase in pollen transfer and higher fruit/seed set. The consequences of Argentine ant invasion can be varied; not only does their invasion have consequences for maintaining biodiversity, ant invasion may also affect weed and pest management strategies.
KeywordsLinepithema humile Boneseed Indirect effects Mutualism Scale insect
We thank the Auckland City Council for permission to work in Te Whau Point reserve. We also thank Jo Rees for data checking, Rosa Henderson for identifying the scale insects, and Stephen Thorpe for identifying other invertebrates. Greg Arnold and Guy Forrester helped with statistical design and analyses. Richard Toft, Shaun Forgie and two anonymous reviewers improved earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was funded by the University of Auckland summer student scholarship programme (to L. Phillips, H. Nathan, J. Galbraith, S. Knight) and the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (C09X0211) and complies with New Zealand laws.
- Briden K (2008) Current status and management of boneseed in New Zealand. Plant Prot Q 23(1):20–22Google Scholar
- Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2005) Change in marine communities. An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- Green OR (1990) Entomologist sets new record at Mt Smart for Iridomyrmex humilis established in New Zealand. Weta 13:14–16Google Scholar
- Harris R, Ward D, Sutherland MA (2002) A survey of the current distribution of Argentine ants, Linepithema humile, in native habitats in New Zealand, and assessment of future risk of establishment. Landcare Research Contract Report LC0102/105 to Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Biosecurity Authority. http://argentineants.landcareresearch.co.nz/documents/Harris_etal_2002_MAF_report.pdf Accessed 20/3/12
- Hodgson CJ, Henderson RC (2000) Coccidae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Fauna of New Zealand 41. Manaaki Whenua Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Meyer GA (2000) Effects of insect feeding on growth and fitness of goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Recent Res Develop Entomol 3:29–41Google Scholar
- Schoener TW (1993) On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communities. In: Kawanabe H, Cohen JE, Iwasaki K (eds) Mutualism and community organization: behavioral, theoretical, and food web approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 365–411Google Scholar
- Stanley MC, Ward DF (2012) Impacts of Argentine ants on invertebrate communities with below-ground consequences. Biodivers Conserv (in press)Google Scholar
- Stanley MC, Ward DF, Harris RJ, Arnold G, Toft R, Rees J (2008) Optimising pitfall sampling for the detection of Argentine ants, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiol 51:461–472Google Scholar
- Ward DF, Harris R (2005) Invasibility of native habitats by Argentine ants, Linepithema humile, in New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 29:215–219Google Scholar
- Ward DF, Harris RJ, Stanley MC (2005) Human-mediated range expansion of Argentine ants Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in New Zealand. Sociobiology 45:401–408Google Scholar
- Ward DF, Green C, Harris RJ, Hartley S, Lester PJ, Stanley MC, Suckling DM, Toft RJ (2010) Twenty years of Argentine ants in New Zealand: past research and future priorities for applied management. NZ Entomol 33:67–78Google Scholar
- Weiss PW, Adair PB, Edwards MA, Winkler MA, Downey PO (2008) Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera (l.) T. Norl. and subsp. rotundata (DC.) T. Norl Plant Prot Q 23:3–14Google Scholar