Advertisement

Plant Biotechnology Reports

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 169–177 | Cite as

Development of a “deconstructed” vector based on the genome of grapevine virus A

  • D. A. GritsenkoEmail author
  • R. T. Kenzhebekova
  • N. D. Deryabina
  • N. N. Galiakparov
Original Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

The development of new vectors based on plant viruses creates more efficient vectors driving high expression levels of heterologous proteins. Currently, deconstructed vectors are more suitable for the expression of target genes. We attempted to develop a deconstructed vector based on the genome of grapevine virus A (GVA) by replacing the coat protein gene of GVA to the coat protein gene (aCP) of ACLSV (apple chlorotic leaf spot virus). This is the first work on creation of deconstructed vector based on GVA genome. The heterologous gene was placed under the control of the CP subgenomic promoter of GVA and fused with ORF5. The 2A self-cleaving sequence was inserted between the target protein and the protein encoded by ORF5 to enable the expression of separate proteins. The transient expression of coat protein of ACLSV from this vector was assessed in both transgenic plants carrying the CP of GVA and in non-transgenic plants. The level of aCP expression in transgenic plants was higher than the expression level in non-transgenic plants. Transgenic plants were developed in this study to increase target protein yield, because GVA cannot move between cells in its non-encapsidated form. The developed vector based on the grapevine virus A genome can be used in transient expression of different heterologous proteins utilizing magnifection method or via co-agroinfiltration with native genome of GVA.

Keywords

GVA ORFs Deconstructed vector CP ACLSV Agroinfiltration Magnifection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Scientific Grant from Ministry of science and education of Republic of Kazakhstan. Number of Grant is AP05132367.

References

  1. Burow MD, Chlan CA, Sen P, Lisca A, Murai N (1990) High-frequency generation of transgenic tobacco plants after modified leaf disk cocultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol Rep 8:124–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chevalier S, Greif C, Bass E, Walter B (1993) Investigations on the aetiology of Kober stem grooving. In: Extended abstracts, XIth ICVG meeting, Nyon, pp 49–49Google Scholar
  3. Chiba M, Reed JC, Prokhnevsky AI, Chapman EJ, Mawassi M, Koonin EV, Carrington JC, Dolja VV (2006) Diverse suppressors of RNA silencing enhance agroinfection by a viral replicon. Virology 346:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conti M, Milne RG, Luisoni E, Boccardo G (1980) A closterovirus from a stem-pitting affected grapevine. Phytopathology 79:394–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engelbrecht D, Kasdorf G (1987) Association of a Closterovirus with grapevine leafroll disease. S Afr J Enol Vitic 8:23–29Google Scholar
  6. Fisher D, Guiltinan M (1995) Rapid, efficient production of homozygous transgenic tobacco plants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens: a seed-to-seed protocol. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galiakparov N, Tanne E, Sela I, Gafny R (1999) Infectious RNA transcripts from grapevine virus A cDNA clone. Virus Genes 19:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galiakparov N, Goszczynski DE, Che X, Batuman O, Bar-Joseph M, Mawassi M (2003a) Two classes of subgenomic RNA of Grapevine virus A produced by internal controller elements. Virology 312:434–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galiakparov N, Tanne E, Sela I, Gafny R (2003b) Functional analysis of the grapevine virus A genome. Virology 306:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garau R, Prota V, Boscia D, Fiori M, Prota U (1995) Pseudococcus affinis, new vector of grapevine trichoviruses A and B. Vitis 34:67–68Google Scholar
  11. Ghag SB, Adki VS, Ganapathi TR, Bapat VA (2017) Heterologous protein production in plant systems. GM Crops Food.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2016.1244599 Google Scholar
  12. Gleba Y, Klimyuk V, Marillonnet S (2007) Viral vectors for the expression of proteins in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleba YY, Tusé DA, Giritch A (2014) Plant viral vectors for delivery by Agrobacterium. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 375:155–192Google Scholar
  14. Gritsenko DA, Galiakparov NN (2018) Insertion of 2A ‘self-cleaving’ peptides between ORF4 and ORF5 of grapevine virus A genome for vector development. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci 19:1034–1040Google Scholar
  15. Gritsenko DA, Kenzhebekova RT, Deryabina ND, Galiakparov NN (2016) Development of T\A vector for direct cloning of PCR products. Eurasian J Appl Biotechnol 4:43–45Google Scholar
  16. Harlow E, Lane D (1988) Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  17. Haviv S, Galiakparov N, Goszczynski DE, Batuman O, Czosnek H, Mawassi M (2006) Engineering the genome of Grapevine virus A into a vector for expression of proteins in herbaceous plants. J Virol Methods 132:227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haviv S, Iddan Y, Goszczynski DE, Mawassi M (2012) The ORF5 of Grapevine virus A is involved in symptoms expression in Nicotiana benthamiana plants. Ann Appl Biol 160:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kopytina DA, Galiakparov NN (2014) Study the ability of the grapevine virus A to infect Nicotiana Benthamiana with agrobacterial infiltration. Vestnik Kaz-nu 1:195–199Google Scholar
  20. Lacks S, Greenberg B (1977) Complementary specificity of restriction endonucleases of Diplococcus pneumoniae with respect to DNA methylation. J Mol Biol 114:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewandowski DJ, Dawson WO (1998) Deletion of internal sequences results in tobacco mosaic virus defective RNAs that accumulate to high levels without interfering with replication of the helper virus. Virology 251:427–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martelli G, Minafra A, Sardarelli P (1997) Grapevine virus A: nucleotide sequence, genome organization, and relationship in the Trichovirus genus. Arch Virol 142:1929–1932Google Scholar
  23. Peyret H, Lomonossoff GP (2015) When plant virology met Agrobacterium: the rise of the deconstructed clones. Plant Biotechnol J 13:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rubinson E, Galiakparov N, Radian S, Sela I, Tanne E, Gafny R (1997) Serological detection of grapevine virus A using antiserum to a nonstructural protein, the putative movement protein. Phytopathology 87:1041–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saunders K, Lomonossoff GP (2013) Exploiting plant virus-derived components to achieve in planta expression and for templates for synthetic biology applications. N Phytol 200:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shamloul M, Trusa J, Mett V, Yusibov V (2014) Optimization and utilization of Agrobacterium-mediated transient protein production in Nicotiana. J Vis Exp 19:86Google Scholar
  27. Tamari F, Hinkley CS, Ramprashad N (2013) A comparison of DNA extraction methods using Petunia hybrida tissues. J Biomol Tech 24:113–118Google Scholar
  28. Tanne E, Ben-Dov Y, Raccah B (1989) Transmission of the corky-bark disease by the mealybug Planococcus ficus. Phytoparasitica 17:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wise AA, Liu Z, Binns AN (2006) Three methods for the introduction of foreign DNA into Agrobacterium. Methods Mol Biol 343:43–53Google Scholar
  30. Zhou ZSh, Dell’Orco M, Saldarelli P, Turturo C, Minafra A, Martelli GP (2006) Identification of an RNA-silencing suppressor in the genome of Grapevine virus A. J Gen Virol 87:2387–2395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Plant Biology and BiotechnologyAlmatyKazakhstan
  2. 2.Al-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations