Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic model calibration methodology based on multiple errors minimization method for the optimal parameter estimation of ASM1

  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A one-step model calibration methodology of the activated sludge model no. 1 (ASM1) of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is proposed. First, the key parameters among all parameters of the ASM1 model are selected by sensitivity analysis based on the effluent quality index. Second, multiple response surface methodology (MRSM) is conducted to find the optimal parameter values of the ASM1 model. Lastly, an MRSM analysis is conducted in order to determine the optimal parameter values. This study was conducted in order to develop a new systematic model calibration methodology that can greatly help the modeler to find the optimal solution by selecting the key parameters and optimizing the parameters. In two case studies of simple activated sludge process and a full-scale plant, the experimental results indicated that the calibrated models can improve the prediction quality of the ASM model and the efficiency of the modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Henze, W. Gujer, T. Mino and M. Loosdrecht, Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, IWA scientific and technical report No. 9, IWA, U.K. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Olsson and B. Newell, Wastewater treatment system — modeling, diagnosis and control, IWA, U.K. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Britta, Ph. D. Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium (2000).

  4. G. Sin, S.W. H. Van Hulle, D. J.W. DePauw, A.V. Griensven and P. A. Vanrolleghem, Water Res., 39, 2459 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P.A. Vanrolleghem, S. Henri, P. Britta, G. Philippe and T. Imre, Water Sci. Technol., 39, 195 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Wu, X. Jiang and A. Wheatley, Desalination, 249, 969 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K.V. Gernaey, M. C.M. Loosdrecht, M. Henze, M. Lind and S. B. Jorgensen, Environ. Model. Soft., 19, 763 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. U. Sarkar, D. Dasgupta, T. Bhattacharya, S. Pal and T. Chakroborty, Desalination, 252, 120 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Sin, G. Insel, D. S. Lee and P. A. Vanrolleghem, Water Sci. Technol., 50, 97 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Nopens, G. Sin, T. Jian and P. A. Vanrolleghem, Water Sci. Technol., 56, 135 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S.L. Kim, Ph. D. Thesis, Pukyong National University, Korea (2007).

  12. U. D. A. Sibel, Environ. Eng. Sci., 25, 1 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G.G. Vining and R. H. Myers, J. Quality Technol., 22, 38 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. K. J. Lin and W. Tu, J. Quality Technol., 27, 34 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. H. R. Pasandideh and S. T. A. Niaki, Appl. Math. Comput., 175, 366 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.B. Kwon, J. S. Lee, S. H. Lee, C. H. Jun and K. J. Kim, J. KORMS, 30, 95 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. H. Kim, A. S. Rao and C.K. Yoo, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 6363 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. R. Kim, Ph. D. Thesis, Pusan University, Korea (2006).

  19. P. A. Vanrolleghem, Systematic calibration protocol for actuated sludge models, BIOMATH Report, Ghent University, Belgium (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChangKyoo Yoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, J., Kim, M., Kim, M. et al. A systematic model calibration methodology based on multiple errors minimization method for the optimal parameter estimation of ASM1. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 291–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0178-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0178-2

Key words

Navigation