Advertisement

Comparison of Microbubble and Air Layer Injection with Porous Media for Drag Reduction on a Self-propelled Barge Ship Model

  • Yanuar
  • Kurniawan T. Waskito
  • Sigit Y. Pratama
  • Bagus D. Candra
  • Bilmantasya A. Rahmat
Research Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Ship resistance issues are related to fuel economy, speed, and cost efficiency. Air lubrication is a promising technique for lowering hull frictional resistance as it is supposed to modify the energy in the turbulent boundary layer and thereby reduce hull friction. In this paper, the objective is to identify the optimum type of air lubrication using microbubble drag reduction (MBDR) and air layer drag reduction (ALDR) techniques to reduce the resistance of a 56-m Indonesian self-propelled barge (SPB). A model with the following dimensions was constructed: length L = 2000 mm, breadth B = 521.60 mm, and draft T = 52.50 mm. The ship model was towed using standard towing tank experimental parameters. The speed was varied over the Froude number range 0.11–0.31. The air layer flow rate was varied at 80, 85, and 90 standard liters per minute (SLPM) and the microbubble injection coefficient over the range 0.20–0.60. The results show that the ship model using the air layer had the highest drag reduction up to a maximum of 90%. Based on the characteristics of the SPB, which operates at low speed, the optimum air lubrication type to reduce resistance in this instance is ALDR.

Keywords

Self-propelled barge Ship resistance Air lubrication Microbubble drag reduction Air layer drag reduction 

References

  1. Butuzov AA (1967) Artificial cavitation flow behind a slender wedge on the lower surface of a horizontal wall. Fluid Dyn 6(2):56–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015141 Google Scholar
  2. Butuzov A, Sverchkov A, Poustoshny A, Chalov S (1999) State of art in investigations and development for the ship on the air cavities. International Workshop on Ship Hydrodynamics, 1–14Google Scholar
  3. Ceccio SL, Makiharju SA (2012) Air lubrication drag reduction on Great Lakes ships. Great Lakes Marit Res Inst 4(4):412–422.  https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0107 Google Scholar
  4. Elbing BR, Perlin M, Winkel ES (2008) Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction. J Fluid Mech 612:201–236.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008003029 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Harvald S (1983) Resistance and propulsion of ships. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Jang J, Choi SH, Ahn S-M, Kim B, Seo JS (2014) Experimental investigation of frictional resistance reduction. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 6(2):363–379.  https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kodama Y, Kakugawa A, Takahashi T, Kawashima H (2000) Experimental study on microbubbles and their applicability to ships for skin friction reduction. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21(5):582–588.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00048-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Latorre R (1997) Ship hull drag reduction using bottom air injection. Ocean Eng 24(2):161–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(96)00005-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Madavan NK, Deutsch S, Merkle CL (1985) Measurements of local skin friction in a microbubble modified turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 156:237–256.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085002075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Makiharju SA, Perlin M, Ceccio SL (2012) On the energy economics of air lubrication drag reduction. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 4(4):412–422.  https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCormick ME, Bhattacharyya R (1973) Drag reduction of a submersible hull by electrolysis. Nav Eng J 85(2):11–16.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1973.tb04788.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mizokami S, Kawakita C, Kodan Y, Takano S, Higasa S, Shigenaga R (2010) Experimental study of air lubrication method and verification of effects on actual hull by means of sea trial. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Tech Rev 47(3):41–47 https://mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e473/e473041.pdf Google Scholar
  13. Sayyadi H, Nematollahi M (2013) Determination of optimum injection flow rate to achieve maximum. Sci Iran 20(3):535–541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2013.05.001 Google Scholar
  14. Yanuar, Gunawan, Sunaryo, Jamaludin A (2012) Micro-bubble drag reduction on a high speed vessel model. J Mar Sci Appl 11(3):301–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-012-1136-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yanuar, Ibadurrahman, Waskito KT, Karim S, Ichsan M (2017) Interference resistance of pentamaran ship model with asymmetric outrigger configurations. J Mar Sci Appl 16(1):42–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1401-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanuar
    • 1
  • Kurniawan T. Waskito
    • 1
  • Sigit Y. Pratama
    • 2
  • Bagus D. Candra
    • 2
  • Bilmantasya A. Rahmat
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Undergraduate Student of Mechanical engineeringUniversity of IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations