Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Application

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 48–59 | Cite as

Experimental study on hydrodynamics of L-type podded propulsor in straight-ahead motion and off-design conditions

  • Dagang Zhao
  • Chunyu Guo
  • Yumin Su
  • Pengfei Dou
  • Tao Jing
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Experimental tests were conducted to evaluate the hydrodynamic performance of an L-type podded propulsor in straight-ahead motion and off-design conditions using an open-water measuring instrument developed by the authors for podded propulsors, a ship model towing tank, and under water particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurement systems. Under the three types of conditions, the main parameters of an L-type podded propulsor were measured, including the propeller thrust and torque, as well as the thrust, side force, and moment of the whole pod unit. In addition, the flow field on the section between the propeller and the strut was analyzed. Experimental results demonstrate that the dynamic azimuthing rate and direction and the turning direction affect the forces on the propeller and the whole pod unit. Forces are asymmetrically distributed between the left and right azimuthing directions because of the effect of propeller rotation. The findings of this study provide a foundation for further research on L-type podded propulsors.

Keywords

L-type podded propulsor off-design condition flow field particle image velocimetry propeller hydrodynamic experimental test 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41176074, 51379043 and 51409063) and was conducted in response to the great support received from a basic research project entitled “Multihull Ship Technology Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defence”, which was conducted at Harbin Engineering University. The authors would like to extend their sincere gratitude to their colleagues in the towing tank laboratory.

References

  1. Cheng BH, Dean JS, Miller RW, Cave WL, 1989. Hydrodynamic evaluation of hull forms with pod propulsors. Naval Engineering Journal, 101, 197–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1989.tb02199.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chicherin IA, Lobatchev MP, Pustoshny AV, Sanchez CA, 2004. On a propulsion prediction procedure for ships with podded propulsors using RANS-code analysis. 1st International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion, Newcastle University, UK, 223–236.Google Scholar
  3. Han JM, Paik KJ, Choi SH, Song IH, Shin SC, 2000. Prediction of steady performance of podded propellers. Proceedings of Annual Spring Meeting of SNAK, Koje, Korea, 144–147.Google Scholar
  4. He W, Chen KQ, Li ZR, 2015. Experimental research on hydrodynamics of tandem type podded propulsors in azimuthing conditions. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology Sci. Tech. (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 43, 01, 107–111. DOI: 10.13245/j.hust.150122Google Scholar
  5. Islam MF, Akinturk A, Veitch B, Liu P, 2009. Performance characteristics of static and dynamic azimuthing podded propulsor. 1st International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, 482–492.Google Scholar
  6. Islam M.F, Veitch B, Liu PF, 2007. Experimental Research on Marine Podded Propulsors. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 4(2), 57–71. DOI: 10.3329/jname.v4i2.989.Google Scholar
  7. ITTC -Recommended Procedures, 2002. Propulsion Performance -Podded Propeller Tests and Extrapolation 7.5-02-03-01.3, Revision 00.Google Scholar
  8. Kawakita C, Hoshino T, Minamiura J, 1994. Prediction of hydrodynamic performance of hydrofoil, strut and pod configuration by a surface panel method. The Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineer, 87, 15–25.Google Scholar
  9. Ohashi K, Hino T, 2004. Numerical simulations of flows around a ship with podded propulsor. 1st International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion, Newcastle University, UK, 211–221.Google Scholar
  10. Palm M, Jurgens D, Bendl D, 2011. Boundary layer control of twin skeg hull form with reaction podded propulsion. 2nd International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  11. Reichel M, 2007. Manoeuvring forces on azimuthing podded propulsor model. Polish Maritime Research, 14, 3–8. DOI: 10.2478/v10012-007-0006-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sasaki N, 2008. The specialist committee on azimuthing podded propulsion–report and recommendations. Presentation at the 25th ITTC, Fukuoka, Japan, Sept.Google Scholar
  13. Shi YM, Zhang WB, Chen G, 2010. Hydrodynamic performance study of POD on single screw commercial vessel. Shipbuilding of China, 51, 36–44.Google Scholar
  14. Szantyr JA, 2001. A surface panel method for hydrodynamic analysis of pod propulsors. Faculty of Ocean Engineering and Ship Technology, 12, 209–228.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dagang Zhao
    • 1
  • Chunyu Guo
    • 1
  • Yumin Su
    • 1
  • Pengfei Dou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tao Jing
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Shipbuilding EngineeringHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.National Engineering Research Center of Shanghai ship Design TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations