Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling effects of constituents and dispersoids on tensile ductility of aluminum alloy

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modeling effects of constituents and dispersoids on the tensile ductility of aluminum alloy were studied. The results show that the tensile ductility decreases with the increase of the volume fraction and size of constituents. Thus, purification can improve the tensile ductility by decreasing the volume fraction of constituents (normally compositions of Fe and Si) and the first-class microcracks. The model also indicates that the tensile ductility decreases with the increase in the volume fraction of dispersoids. Decreasing the volume fraction of dispersoids along the grain boundaries by proper heat-treatment and improving the cohesion strength between dispersoids and matrix can also improve the tensile ductility by decreasing the volume fraction of the second-class microcracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LUDTKA G M, LAUGHLIN D E. The influence of microstructure and strength on the fracture mode and toughness of 7XXX series aluminum alloys[J]. Metall Trans A, 1982, 13(2): 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DESHPANDE N U, GOKHALE A M, DENZER D K, et al. Relationship between fracture toughness, fracture path, and microstructure of 7050 aluminum alloy: Part I. Quantitative characterization[J]. Metall Trans A, 1998, 29(5): 1191–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. HORNBOGEN E, GRÄF M. Fracture toughness of precipitation hardened alloys containing narrow soft zones at grain boundaries[J]. Acta Metall, 1977, 25(4): 877–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. JATA K V, STARKE E A. Fatigue crack growth and fracture toughness behavior of an Al-Li-Cu alloy[J]. Metall Trans A, 1986, 17(5): 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LIU Gang, ZHANG Guo-jun, DING Xiang-dong, et al. A model for fracture toughness of high strength aluminum alloys containing second particles of various sized scales[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2002, 12(3): 706–713. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. HORNBOGEN E, STARKE E A. Theory assisted design of high strength low alloy aluminum[J]. Acta Metall Mater, 1993, 41(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. GOKHALE A M, DESHPANDE N U, DENZER D K, et al. Relationship between fracture toughness, fracture path, and microstructure of 7050 aluminum alloy: Part II. Multiple micromechanisms-based fracture toughness model[J]. Metall Trans A, 1998, 29(6): 1203–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LIU G, ZHANG G J, DING X D, et al. The influence of multiscale-sized second-phase particles on ductility of aged aluminum alloys[J]. Metall Trans A, 2004, 35(10): 1725–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ROVEN H J. A model for fracture toughness prediction in aluminum alloys exhibiting the slip band decohesion mechanism[J]. Scripta Metall Mater, 1992, 26(5): 1383–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. LIU G, SUN J, NAN C W, et al. Experimental and multiscale modeling of the coupled influence of constituents and precipitates on the ductile fracture of heat-treatable aluminum alloys[J]. Acta Mater, 2005, 53(10): 3459–3468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LIU G, ZHANG G J, DING X D, et al. Dependence of fracture toughness on multiscale second phase particles in high strength Al alloys[J]. Mater Sci Tech, 2003, 19(7): 887–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. LIU Gang, ZHANG Guo-jun, DING Xiang-dong, et al. Model for tensile ductility of high strength Al alloys containing second particles of various sized scales[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2002, 12(1): 1–10. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. HUTCHINSON J W. Singular behavior at the end of a tensile crack in a hardening material[J]. J Mech Phys Solids, 1968, 16(1): 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. RICE J R, ROSENGREN G F. Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening material[J]. J Mech Phys Solids, 1968, 16(1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. KANNINEN M F, POPELAR C H. Advanced Fracture Mechanics[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985: 300.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. DOWLING N E. J-integral estimates for cracks in infinite bodies[J]. Eng Fract Mech, 1987, 26(2): 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. WALSH J A, JATA K V, STARKE E A. The influence of Mn dispersoid content and stress state on ductile fracture of 2134 type Al alloys[J]. Acta Metall, 1989, 37(9): 2861–2871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DUMONT D, DESCHAMPS A, BRECHET Y. On the relationship between microstructure, strength and toughness in AA7050 aluminum alloy[J]. Mater Sci Eng A, 2003, A356: 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Min PhD  (宋 晞).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project (2005CB623704) supported by National Key Fundamental Research and Development Program of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, M., Chen, Kh. & Qi, Xw. Modeling effects of constituents and dispersoids on tensile ductility of aluminum alloy. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 14, 456–459 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-007-0089-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-007-0089-x

Key words

Navigation