Advertisement

Applied Geophysics

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 529–542 | Cite as

Properties of an improved Gabor wavelet transform and its applications to seismic signal processing and interpretation

  • Zhan-Huai Ji
  • Sheng-Gang Yan
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical study of the complete transform of improved Gabor wavelets (IGWs), and discusses its application to the processing and interpretation of seismic signals. The complete Gabor wavelet transform has the following properties. First, unlike the conventional transform, the improved Gabor wavelet transform (IGWT) maps time domain signals to the time-frequency domain instead of the time-scale domain. Second, the IGW’s dominant frequency is fixed, so the transform can perform signal frequency division, where the dominant frequency components of the extracted sub-band signal carry essentially the same information as the corresponding components of the original signal, and the subband signal bandwidth can be regulated effectively by the transform’s resolution factor. Third, a time-frequency filter consisting of an IGWT and its inverse transform can accurately locate target areas in the time-frequency field and perform filtering in a given time-frequency range. The complete IGW transform’s properties are investigated using simulation experiments and test cases, showing positive results for seismic signal processing and interpretation, such as enhancing seismic signal resolution, permitting signal frequency division, and allowing small faults to be identified.

Keywords

Seismic signal inverse transform Gabor wavelet transform faults resolutions instantaneous phase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arivazhagan, S., Ganesan, L., and Priyal, S. P., 2006, Texture classification using Gabor wavelets based rotation invariant features: Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 1976–1982.Google Scholar
  2. Bastiaans, M. J., 1980, Gabor’s expansion of a signal into Gaussian elementary signals: Proceedings of the IEEE, 68(4), 538–539.Google Scholar
  3. Braga, I. L. S., and Moraes, F. S., 2013, High-resolution gathers by inverse Q filtering in the wavelet domain: Geophysics, 78(2), 53–61.Google Scholar
  4. Cai, H. P., He, Z. H., Gao, G., and Huang, D. J., 2013, Seismic data matching pursuit using hybrid optimization algorithm and its application: Journal of Jiaotong University, 44(2), 687–694.Google Scholar
  5. Chakraborty, A., and Okaya, D., 1995, Frequency-time decomposition of seismic data using wavelet-based methods: Geophysics, 60(6), 1906–1916.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, L., and Song, H. B., 2008, Extraction of seismic time-frequency attribute based on Morlet wavelet match tracing algorithm: Oil Geophysical Prospecting(in Chinese), 43(6), 673–679.Google Scholar
  7. Christos, Y., Jedrzej, M., Konstantinos, R., and Ioannis, A., 2014, Multicomponent decomposition of a timevarying acoustic Doppler signal generated by a passing railway vehicle using complex shifted Morlet wavelets: Transportation Research Part C, 44, 34–51.Google Scholar
  8. Dutilleux, P., Grossmann, A., and Kronland-Martinet, R., 1988, Application of the wavelet transform to the analysis, transformation and synthesis of musical sounds: Preprint of the 85th A.E.S. Convention, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  9. Farge, M., 1992, Wavelet transform and their applications to turbulence: Ann, Rev. Fluid Mech., 24, 395–457.Google Scholar
  10. Feichtinger, H. G., and Strohmer, T., 1998, Gabor analysis and algorithms: Theory and applications: Birkhäuser, Boston, 267–294.Google Scholar
  11. Gabor, D., 1946, Theory of Communication: J. I. E. E. E., 93, 429–441.Google Scholar
  12. Goupillaud, P., Grossmann, A., and Morlet, J., 1984, Cycleoctave and related transforms in seismic signal analysis: Geoexploration, 23, 85–102.Google Scholar
  13. Gröchenig, K., 2001, Foundations of time-frequency analysis: Brikhäuser, Boston, 245–300.Google Scholar
  14. Grossmann, A., and Morlet, J., 1985, Decomposition of function into wavelets of constant shape, and related transforms, In Mathematics+Physics, In Streit, L., Ed., Lectures on Recent Results, Singapore: World Scientific., Vo.1, 135–165.Google Scholar
  15. Grossmann, A., Kronland-Martinet, R., and Morlet, J., 1989, Reading and understanding continues wavelet transforms, In: Wavelets, Time-frequency Methods and Phase Space. 1st Int. Wavelets Conf., Marseille, 2–20.Google Scholar
  16. Gryllias, K. C., and Antoniadis, I. A., 2013, Estimation of the instantaneous rotation speed using complex shifted Morlet wavelets: Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 38, 78–95.Google Scholar
  17. He, P., Li, P., and Sun, H. Q., 2011, Feature extraction of acoustic signals based on complex Morlet wavelet: Procedia Engineering, 15, 464–468.Google Scholar
  18. Huang, Y., Xu, D., and Wen, X. K., 2013, Optimization of wavelets in multi-wavelet decomposition and reconstruction method: Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 52(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  19. Ji, Z. H., Yan, S. G., and Bao, J. Q., An improved Gabor wavelet and its complete transforms: IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, Conference Proceedings, Sept. 19-22, 2015, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China, 782–787.Google Scholar
  20. Ji, Z. H., Yan, S. G., and Zhang, L. Y., 2016, Detecting subtle faults using instantaneous phase of sub-band seismic data: SPG/SEG Beijing 2016 International Geophysical Conference, Conference Proceedings, 20-22, Apr. 2016, Beijing, China, 135–138.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, D. L., and Parks, T. W., 2000, A high resolution dataadaptive time-frequency representation [J]. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 38(12), 2127–2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kulesh, M., Holschneider, M., and Diallo, M. S., 2008, Geophysical wavelet library: Applications of the continuous wavelet transform to the polarization and dispersion analysis of signals: Computers & Geosciences, 34, 1732–1752.Google Scholar
  23. Liu, E., Queen, J. H., et al., 2003, Observation and analysis of frequency-dependent anisotropy from a multicomponent VSP at Bluebell-Altamont field, Utah: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 54(3-4), 319–333.Google Scholar
  24. Liu, H. Y., Huang, W. G., et al., 2014, Adaptive spectral kurtosis filtering based on Morlet wavelet and its application for signal transients detection: Signal Processing, 96, 118–124.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, W. Y., and Tang, B. P., 2011, A hybrid time-frequency method based on improved Morlet wavelet and auto terms window: Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 7575–7581.Google Scholar
  26. Mansinha, L., Stockwell, R. G., et al., 1997, Local S-spectrum analysis of 1-D and 2-D data. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 103(3), 329–336.Google Scholar
  27. Morlet, J., Arens, G., Fourgeau, E., and Giard, D., 1982, Wave propagation and sampling theory-Part II: Sampling theory and complex waves: Geophysics, 47(2), 222–236.Google Scholar
  28. Qin, Q. Q., and Yang, Z. K., 1998, Practical wavelet analysia: Xidian University Press, Xi’an, China.Google Scholar
  29. Shen, L. L., Bai, L., and Fairhurst, M., 2007, Gabor wavelets and General Discriminant Analysis for face identification and verification: Image and Vision Computing, 25, 553–563.Google Scholar
  30. Simonovski, I., and Boltežar, M., 2003, The norms and variances of the Gabor, Morlet and general harmonic wavelet functions: Journal of Sound and Vibration, 64, 545–557.Google Scholar
  31. Stockwell, R. G., Mansinha, L., and Lowe, R. P., 1996, Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform: IEEE Trans. Signal Process, 44(4), 998–001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taner, M. T., Koehler, F., and Sheriff, R. E., 1979, Complex seismic trace analysis: Geophysics, 44(6), 1041–1063.Google Scholar
  33. Yang, L. H., Dai, D. Q., et al., 2003, A wavelet tour of Signal processing (Second edition), in Mallat, S., Ed., Signal Process: China Machine Press, 62–65.Google Scholar
  34. Zhang, F. C., and Li, C. H., 2013, Amplitude-preserved AVF and isofrequency section construction based on seismic matching pursuit: Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum (in Chinese), 52(3), 234–239.Google Scholar
  35. Zuñga, A. G., Florindo, J. B., and Bruno, O. M., 2014, Gabor wavelets combined with volumetric fractal dimension applied to texture analysis: Pattern Recognition Letters, 36,135–143.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editorial Office of Applied Geophysics and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Marine Science and TechnologyNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of ScienceXi’an University of Science and TechnologyXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations