Skip to main content
Log in

Valuation of lake and marsh wetlands ecosystem services in China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands are highly productive natural ecosystems, providing valuable goods and services. There is growing interest in transferring ecosystem service value from the existing wetlands studied to other wetlands ecosystems at a large geographic scale. The benefit transfer method uses the known values from wetlands to predict the value of other wetland sites. This methodology requires only limited time and resources. The present study calculated the value of the ecological services provided by lake and marsh wetlands in China in terms of biodiversity indices, water quality indices and economic indices. Basic data on wetlands were obtained through remote sensing images. The results show that: 1) The total ecosystem service value of the lake and marsh wetlands in 2008 was calculated to be 8.1841 × 1010 United States Dollars (USD), with the marsh and lake wetlands contributing 5.6329 × 1010 and 2.5512 × 1010 USD, respectively. Values of marsh ecosystem service were concentrated in Heilongjiang Province (2.5516 × 1010 USD), Qinghai Province (1.2014 × 1010 USD), and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (1.1884 × 1010 USD). The value of the lakes were concentrated in Tibet Autonomous Region (6.223 × 109 USD), Heilongjiang (5.810 × 109 USD), and Qinghai (5.500 × 109 USD). 2) Waste treatment and climate regulation services contributed to 26.29% and 24.74% respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the marsh wetlands. Hydrological regulation and waste treatment contributed to 41.39% and 32.75%, respectively, of the total ecosystem service value of the lake wetlands. 3) The total ecological service value of the lake and marsh wetlands was 54.64% of the total service value of natural grassland ecosystems and 30.34% of the total service value of forests ecosystems in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya G, 2000. Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 63–74. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00168-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Xiao R, Zhang K et al., 2013. Soil organic carbon as affected by land use in young and old reclaimed regions of a coastal estuary wetland, China. Soil Use and Management, 29(1): 57–64. doi: 10.1111/sum.12021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber E B, 2000. Valuing the environment as input: Application to mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 47–61. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00167-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodegom P V, Bakker C, Gon H D, 2004. Identifying key issues in environmental wetland research using scaling and uncertainty analysis. Regional Environmental Change, 4(2–3): 100–106. doi: 10.1007/s10113-004-0069-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedfeldt P T, Watzin M C, Richardson B C, 2000. Using GIS to identify functionally significant wetlands in the northeastern United States. Environmental Management, 26(1): 13–24. doi: 10.1007/s002670010067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S, 2010. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modeling & Software, 25(12): 1582–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Zhongxin, Zhang Shixin, 2000. Study on ecosystem benefit of china. Chinese Science Bulletin, 45(1): 17–22. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R D et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253–260. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Lijuan, 2004. Evaluation on functions of Poyang Lake ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 23(4): 47–51. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, 1997. Introduction: What are ecosystem services? In: Daily G C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystem. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshet T, Baron M G, Shechter M, 2007. Exploring benefit transfer: Disamenities of waste transfer stations. Environmental & Resource Economics, 37(3): 521–547. doi: 10.1007/s10640-006-9047-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency, 2010. Scaling up ecosystem benefits—A contribution to the economics of ecosystem and biodiversity (TEEB) study. In: European Environment Agency Report No. 4. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/scaling-up-ecosystem-benefits-a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber S, Costanza R, Childers D L et al., 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience, 56(2): 121–133. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farely J, 2008. The role of prices in conserving critical natural capital. Conservation Biology, 22(6): 1399–1408. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01090.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennessy M S, Jacobs A D, Kentula M E, 2004. Review of rapid methods for assessing wetland conditions. In: US Environmental Production Agency Report No. EPA/620/R-04/009. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nheerl/download_files/publications/rapidmethodreview.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnoff D, Tschirhart J, 2008. Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(2): 91–114. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua, Chen Liding et al., 2001. Scheme of ecological regionalization in China. Ecological Acta, 21(1): 1–6. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Bojie, Zhou Guoyi, Bai Yongfei et al., 2009. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in china. Advances in Earth Science, 24(6): 571–576. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascoigne W R, Hoag D, Koontz L et al., 2011. Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecological Economic, 70(10): 1715–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghermandi A, Bergh J M, Brander L M et al., 2008. The Economic Value of Wetland Conservation and Creation: A Meta-analysis. FEEM Working Paper No. 79.2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot R, Brande L, Ploeg S et al., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystem and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L B, Bai J H, Gao H F et al., 2012. Soil organic carbon content and storage of raised field wetlands in different functional zones of a typical shallow freshwater lake, China. Soil Research, 50(8): 664–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R J, Rosenberger R S, 2010. Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(3): 479–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00592.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lars H, Koppen K V, Groot R D et al., 2006. Spatial scale, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2): 209–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Wenhua, 2008. Ecosystem Service Valuation: Theory, Method and Application. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 37–51. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Costanza R, Troy A et al., 2010. Valuing New Jersey’s ecosystem services and natural capital: A spatially explicit benefit transfer. Environment Management, 45(6): 1271–1285. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Xiaohui, Lu Xianguo, Jiangming et al., 2008. Research on the valuation of wetland ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(11): 5625–5631. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke M B, Florax R M, Vermaat J E et al., 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environmental & Resources Economics, 33(2): 223–250. doi: 10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke M, Brauer I, Gerdes H et al., 2011. Using meta-analysis and GIS for value transfer and scaling up: Valuing climate change induced losses of European wetlands. Environment Resource Economic, 52(3): 395–413. doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2008. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics, 2000. China Statistical Yearbook 2000. Beijing: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics, 2008. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (United States), Committee on Characterization of Wetlands, 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu Z G, Gong P, Cheng X et al., 2009. Geographical characteristics of China’s wetlands derived from remotely sensed data. Science in China Series D: Earth Science, 52(6): 723–738. doi: 10.1007/s11430-009-0075-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu Z G, Zhang H Y, Wang X W et al., 2012. Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(22): 2813–2823. doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5093-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojea E, Ruiz-Benito P, Markandya A et al., 2012. Wood provisioning in Mediterranean forests: A bottom-up spatial valuation approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 20: 78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Zhiyun, Zhao Tongqian, Wang Xiaoke et al., 2004. Ecosystem services analyses and valuation of china terrestrial surface water system. Acta Ecological Sinica, 24(10): 2091–2099. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger R S, Loomis J B, 2003. Benefit transfer. In: Champ P A (ed.). A Primer on Non-market Valuation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 445–482.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf S G, Wilson M A, Boumans R J et al., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393–408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Water Resources of the P. R. C., 2000. Statistical Bulletin of Chinese Water Conservancy 2000. Availabe at: http://www.cws.net.cn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan Bentai, Xu Haigen, Ding Hui etal., 2007. Methodology of comprehensive biodiversity assessment. Biodiversity Science, 15(1): 97–106. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Sumin, Dou Hongshen, 1998. Chinese Lakes. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • William J M, James G G, 2000. The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 25–33. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00165-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William J M, James G G, 2007. Wetlands (4th edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsom M A, Carpenter S R, 1999. Economics valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications, 9(3): 772–783. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0772:EVOFES]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward R T, Wui Y S, 2001. The economic value of wetland services: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 37(2): 257–270. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Gaodi Zhang Yili, Lu Chunxia etal., 2001. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(1): 47–53. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X etal., 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5): 911–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao Weihao, Su Chunhua, Chen Bin, 2009. Progress of wetlands ecosystem service evaluation. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 16(3): 245–249. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Xiaofei, Zhang Yuxia, Zhao Hongmei etal., 2010. Freezethaw effects on sorption/desorption of dissolved organic carbon in wetland soils. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(3): 209–217. doi: 10.1007/S11769-010-0209-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Xinxiao, Lu Shaowei, Ji Fang etal., 2005. The assessment of the forest ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecological Sinica, 25(8): 2096–2102. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Ping, Ma Tao, 2011. A comment on studies on evaluation of services value of wetland ecosystem in China. Wetland Science, 9(2): 203–208. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Kuiyi, 1999. Chinese Marsh. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Ling, Wang Erda, 2011. An empirical study of meta-regression benefit transfer of natural resources. Resources Science, 33(1): 31–40. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke etal., 2003. Ecosystem services and their valuation of terrestrial surface water system in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(4): 443–452. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Tongqian, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua etal., 2004. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in china. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(4): 480–491. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demin Zhou.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Forestry Public Interest Research Program (No. 201204201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41171415)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhou, D., Niu, Z. et al. Valuation of lake and marsh wetlands ecosystem services in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 24, 269–278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z

Keywords

Navigation