Skip to main content
Log in

Ethernet based time synchronization for Raspberry Pi network improving network model verification for distributed active turbulent flow control

  • Published:
Control Theory and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Friction drag primarily determines the total drag of transport systems. A promising approach to reduce drag at high Reynolds numbers (> 104) are active transversal surface waves in combination with passive methods like a riblet surface. For the application in transportation systems with large surfaces such as airplanes, ships or trains, a large scale distributed real-time actuator and sensor network is required. This network is responsible for providing connections between a global flow control and distributed actuators and sensors. For the development of this network we established at first a small scale network model based on Simulink and TrueTime. To determine timescales for network events on different package sizes we set up a Raspberry Pi based testbed as a physical representation of our first model. These timescales are reduced to time differences between the deterministic network events to verify the behavior of our model. Experimental results were improved by synchronizing the testbed with sufficient precision. With this approach we assure a link between the large scale model and the later constructed microcontroller based real-time actuator and sensor network for distributed active turbulent flow control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DFG. GEPRIS, 2014: http://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/202175528.

  2. M. Dueck, M. Kaparaki, S. Srivastava, et al. Development of areal time actuation control in a network-simulation framework for active drag reduction in turbulent flow. International Automatic Control Conference (CACS), New York: IEEE, 2013, 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Dueck, M. Schloesser, M. Kaparaki, et al. Raspberry Pibased testbed verifying truetime network model parameters for application in distributed active turbulent flow control. Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference. New York: IEEE, 2014:1970–1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Cervin, D. Henriksson, B. Lincoln, et al. How does control timing affect performance? Analysis and simulation of timing using jitterbug and truetime. IEEE Control Systems Magazine,2003, 23(3): 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. IEEE Standard for A Smart Transducer Interface for Sensorsand Actuators–Network Capable Application Processor (NCAP)Information Model. New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000.

  6. C. Ionete, D. Sendrescu, D. Popescu, et al. Ethernet for networked control an experimental test bench. Proceedings of the 49thAnnual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, Piscataway: IEEE, 2010: 3556–3559.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cervin, D. Henriksson, M. Ohlin. TrueTime 2.0 Beta–Reference Manual. Sweden: Department of Automatic Control,Lund University, 2010.

  8. R. Lehrbaum. Using the PC architecture in embedded applications. Proceedings of WESCON. New York: IEEE, 1993:610–620.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Schloesser, A. Schnitzer, Y. Hong, et al. iNODE: intelligent network operating device for neurological and neurophysiological research. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.New York: Springer, 2009: 1710–1713.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. The Raspberry Pi Foundation. FAQs of Raspberry PI. 2014:http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs.

  11. S. Banerjee, D. Sethia, T. Mittal, et al. Secure sensor node withRaspberry PI. International Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies. New York: IEEE,2013: 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Network Time Foundation. The Network Time Protocol. 2014:http://www.ntp.org/.

  13. IEEE Std 1588-2008: Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems. New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2008.

  14. H. Gränicher. Messung beendet- was nun?: Einführung und Nachschlagewerk für die Planung und Auswertung von Messungen. Stuttgart: vdf, Hochsch.-Verlag an der ETH Zürich, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Dueck.

Additional information

This work was supported by German Research Foundation (DFG) (No. 1779-WA3076/1-1).

Marcel DUECK received the B.Sc. in Scientific Programming from Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Aachen, Germany, and a degree as mathematical technical software developer (MaTSE) from the Chamber of Commerce (IHK, Aachen) in 2010. In 2012, he received the M.Sc. in Technomathematics “Integration of mobile iOS devices in instrumentation applications” from Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Aachen, Germany. He is a Ph.D. candidate at the RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, and working as Research Associate in the Central Institute of Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, Systems of Electronics, Forschungszentrum J ülich, Germany. His research interest covers distributed large scale real-time actuator and sensor networks and iterative learning control algorithms.

Mario SCHLOESSER received the Diploma in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Aachen, Germany, in 2006. He has sevenyears of R&D experience as Development Engineer in the Central Institute of Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, Systems of Electronics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany. Since 2014, he is appointed as Head of the Digital Hardware Systems Department. His current research interests include the miniaturization of distributed sensor and actuator networks, high speed communication protocols and embedded DAQ systems.

Stefan van WAASEN received his Diplomaas well as Doctor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Duisburg University, Germanyin 1994 and 1999, respectively. He has 13years experience in industrial development of semiconductor based wireless and wireline communication products. Since 2010, he is Director of the Central Institute of Engineering, Electronic and Analytics: ElectronicSystems at Forschungszentrum Jülich. Since 2014, he is also Professor for Measurement and Sensor Systems at University of Duisburg-Essen at the Faculty of Engineering. His current reasearch interests are complex detector systems and high integration strategies.

Michael SCHIEK received the Diploma degreein Physics in 1994 and the Ph.D. degree in 1998 both from the RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. Since 1998, hehas been Scientific Assistant at the Research Centre Jülich, Central Institute ZEA-2 Electronic Systems, Germany, where he is heading of the team “Modelling and Algorithms”.His current research interests include nonlinear time series analysis and distributed sensor-actuator networks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dueck, M., Schloesser, M., van Waasen, S. et al. Ethernet based time synchronization for Raspberry Pi network improving network model verification for distributed active turbulent flow control. Control Theory Technol. 13, 204–210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-015-4143-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-015-4143-1

Keywords

Navigation