Usability and acceptance evaluation of ACESO: a Web-based breast cancer survivorship tool
The specific objective of this research is to design and develop a personalized Web application to support breast cancer survivors after treatment, as they deal with post-treatment challenges, such as comorbidities and side effects of treatment.
A mixed-methods approach, utilizing a combination of think-aloud analysis, personal interviews, and surveys, was adopted for user acceptance and usability testing among a group of breast cancer survivors. User feedback was gathered on their perceived value of the application, and any user-interface issues that may hinder the overall usability were identified.
The application’s portability and capability of organizing their entire breast cancer-related medical history as well as tracking various quality of life indicators were perceived to be valuable features. The application had an overall high usability; however, certain sections of the application were not as intuitive to locate. Visual elements of the website were appreciated; however, overall experience would benefit from incorporating more sociable elements that exhibit positive re-enforcement within the end user and provide a friendlier experience.
The results of the study showcase the need for more personalized tools and resources to support survivors in self-management. It also demonstrates the ability to integrate breast cancer survivorship care plans from diverse providers and paves the way to add further value-added features in consumer health applications, such as personal decision support.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Using a personal decision support-based tool can serve as a training tool and resource, providing these patients with pertinent information about the various aspects of their long-term health, while educating them about any related side effects and symptoms. It is hoped that making such tools more accessible could help in engaging survivors to play an active role in managing their health and encourage shared decision-making with their providers.
KeywordsBreast cancer Survivorship Patient engagement Self-management Patient reported outcomes
AK conceptualized, designed, and developed the intervention, contributed to data collection, analysis, and wrote sections of the manuscript. PN contributed to the study design, interpretation, and analysis of results and wrote sections of the manuscript.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.American Cancer Society. How Common Is Breast Cancer? https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html. Accessed July 26, 2017.
- 9.Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncolo Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):5091–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fann JR, Thomas-Rich AM, Katon WJ, Cowley D, Pepping M, McGregor BA, et al. Major depression after breast cancer: a review of epidemiology and treatment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(2):112–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.10.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, Lipkus IM, Lobach D, Snyder DC, Sloane R, et al. Main outcomes of the FRESH START trial: a sequentially tailored, diet and exercise mailed print intervention among breast and prostate cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(19):2709–18. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.10.7094.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.NCI Community Cancer Centers Program. Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Plan. 08 2008.Google Scholar
- 35.Royce, W. Managing the development of large software systems. In: Proc. Westcon, pp. 328–339. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos (1970).Google Scholar
- 36.Davis F. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. 1986.Google Scholar
- 37.Dillon A. User acceptance of information technology. https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/BookChapters/Dillon-acceptance.htm. Published June 30, 2005. Accessed 26 July 2017.
- 38.Ozok AA, Gurses AP, Wu H, Nelson M, Moen D, Wei J. Usability and user acceptance for personal health records: a perspective from healthcare citizens. In: Online communities and social computing. Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 690–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Kim E, Wang M, Lau C, Kim Y. Application and evaluation of personal health information management system. Proceedings of the 26th annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. 2004.Google Scholar
- 45.Miller SM, Hudson SV, Hui S-KA, et al. Development and preliminary testing of PROGRESS: a web-based education program for prostate cancer survivors transitioning from active treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(3):541–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0431-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 47.Nambisan P. Online public health preparedness training programs: an evaluation of user experience with the technological environment. Online J Public Health Inform. 2010;2(3) https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v2i3.3012.
- 49.Brennan PF, Kwiatkowski K. How do lay people manage health information in the home? In: Marques E, editor. Proceedings, 8th international congress in nursing informatics 2003. New York: Elsevier; 2003.Google Scholar
- 53.Travers M. Qualitative research through case studies. SAGE; 2001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209724.
- 54.Wiley: Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective tests, 2nd Edition - Jeffrey Rubin, Dana Chisnell, Jared Spool. http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470185481.html. Accessed July 31, 2017.
- 55.Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Kreps GL, Menon U, McCance K, Parsons SK, et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: a comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(3):342–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 57.Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(3) https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e15.