Abstract
The authors should be commended on their methodological development of stochastic processes for slope and aspect. Their development of basic distribution theory needed to study these two processes, and the sufficient conditions that ensure independence and non-informative induced priors, provide a thorough contribution to the collection of work on gradient processes. The fully model-based approach for inference for slope and aspect enables the propagation of uncertainty to environmental process models of interest that would use these variables as explanatory variables in a regression. I greatly appreciate the opportunity to comment on this exciting work and offer some additional model considerations and applications. Specifically, I reaffirm the importance of scalability of the methodology to large datasets, offering a few considerations with regard to model specification. Next, I discuss the unique challenges of using the predictive distributions of the slope and aspect processes as input variables in spatial regression models. Finally, I offer possible applications and extensions of this work that might provide innovative insights into environmental processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee S, Gelfand AE, Finley AO, Sang H (2008) Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 70(4):825–848
Cressie N, Johannesson G (2008) Fixed rank kriging for very large spatial data sets. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 70(1):209–226
Datta A, Banerjee S, Finley AO, Gelfand AE (2016) Hierarchical nearest-neighbor Gaussian process models for large geostatistical datasets. J Am Stat Assoc 111:800–812
Hanks EM, Schliep EM, Hooten MB, Hoeting JA (2015) Restricted spatial regression in practice: geostatistical models, confounding, and robustness under model misspecification. Environmetrics 26(4):243–254
Hodges JS, Reich BJ (2010) Adding spatially-correlated errors can mess up the fixed effect you love. Am Stat 64(4):325–334
Hughes J, Haran M (2013) Dimension reduction and alleviation of confounding for spatial generalized linear mixed models. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 75(1):139–159
Kaufman CG, Schervish MJ, Nychka DW (2008) Covariance tapering for likelihood-based estimation in large spatial data sets. J Am Stat Assoc 103(484):1545–1555
Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N (2009) Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 71(2):319–392
Siegel E (2017) The terrifying physics of how wildfires spread so fast. Starts With a bang. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/09/06/the-terrifying-physics-of-how-wildfires-spread-so-fast/#2e41e1ce7791. Accessed 5 Sept 2018
Acknowledgements
This research is supported in part by a US National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology Program Grant EF-1638550.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This comment refers to the invited paper available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-018-0619-x.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schliep, E.M. Comments on: Process modeling for slope and aspect with application to elevation data maps. TEST 27, 778–782 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-018-0620-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-018-0620-4