Skip to main content
Log in

Should the annulus be fixed in aortic valve-sparing root replacement with remodeling?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

If the aortic root dilates after native aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction with remodeling, aortic regurgitation may recur. However, it has not been demonstrated clearly that the aortic root dilates after remodeling.

Methods

This study enrolled 15 patients who underwent an aortic valve-sparing operation with remodeling (2002–2014) but without any ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ) fixation. Technically, special care was taken to pass the sutures through the fibrous annulus. The diameter of the aortic root (VAJ, neosinus of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction), degree of aortic regurgitation, and effective height of the aortic valve were measured in the patients. All patients had postoperative follow-up, and the median follow-up period was 7.3 (IQR: 3.1–8.3) years.

Results

The mean preoperative diameters of the VAJ, sinus of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction were 23.5 ± 2.3 (20–27) mm, 51.1 ± 7.2 (43–60) mm, and 42.4 ± 9.4 (29–58) mm, respectively. The postoperative diameters of the VAJ changed from 21.6 ± 2.6 (early) to 21.8 ± 2.9 mm (late) (p = 0.75). The diameters of the sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction changed from 26.5 ± 3.0 (early) to 28.5 ± 4.2 mm (late) (p = 0.0013), and 22.4 ± 3.0 (early) to 24.3 ± 3.3 mm (late) (p = 0.0003), respectively. The effective height of the aortic valve changed from 9.7 ± 1.3 (early) to 8.9 ± 2.0 mm (late) (p = 0.08). The degree of aortic regurgitation (grade: 0–4) changed from 0.3 ± 0.5 (early) to 1.2 ± 0.8 (late) (p = 01558).

Conclusions

Significant VAJ dilation and changes in aortic valve configuration after our remodeling procedure were not observed. Therefore, fixation of the annulus with remodeling may not be needed for cases without preoperative dilation of the annulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarsam MA, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic valve annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:435–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-spring operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103:617–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. David TE, Feindel CM, Webb GD, Colman JM, Armstrong S, Maganti M. Long-term results of aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:347–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahnavardi M, Yan TD, Bannon PG, Wilson MK. Aortic valve-sparing operations in aortic root aneurysms: remodeling or reimplantation. ? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:189–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Itoh T, Ohtsubo S, Furukawa K, Norita H. Aortic root endoscopy in valve sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:141–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Furukawa K, Ohteki H, Cao ZL, Narita Y, Okazaki Y, Ohtsubo S, et al. Evaluation of native valve sparing aortic root reconstruction with direct imaging—reimplantation or remodeling ? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1636–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohtsubo S, Itoh T, Natsuaki M, Furukawa K, Yoshikai M, Suda H, et al. Successful valve-sparing in aortic root reconstruction under endoscopic guidance. Eur J Cardio thorac Surg 2000;17:420–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schäfers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:436–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leyh RG, Schmidtke C, Sievers HH, Yacoub MH. Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after different types of valve-preserving surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:2153–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erasmi A, Sievers HH, Scharfschwerdt M, Eckel T, Misfeld M. In vitro hydrodynamics, cusp-bending deformation, and aortic root distensibility for different types of aortic valve-spring operations: remodeling, sinus prosthesis, and reimplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:1044–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Oliveria NC, David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Eriksson MJ, Rakowski H, et al. Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:789–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura M, Kazui T, Morishita K, Tanaka T, Komatsu S. Late evaluation by CT scanning in replacement of thoracic aorta with Dacron grafts presealed collagen. Jpn J Artif Organs. 1996;25:463–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grande KJ, Cochran RP, Reinhall PG, Kunzelman KS. Mechanisms of aortic valve incompetence: Finite element modeling of aortic root dilatation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1851–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marom G, Haj-Ali R, Rosenfeld M, Schäfers HJ, Raanami E. Aortic root numeric model: annulus diameter prediction of effective height and coaptation in post-aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:406–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maselli D, Weltert L, Scaffa R, De Paulis R. How to achieve an aortic root remodeling by performing an aortic root reimplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:e136–e7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maselli D, Weltert L, Scaffa R, Nardella S, Wolf LG, De Paulis R. Differences in aortic cusp coaptation between the reimplantation and the remodeling techniques of aortic valve-sparing surgery: An in vitro porcine model study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:615–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. David TE, Feindel CM, David CM, Manlhiot C. A quarter of a century of experience with aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:872–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lansac E, Centa ID, Sleilaty G, Crozat A, Bouchot O, Hacini R, et al. An aortic ring: From physiologic reconstruction of the root to a standardized approach for aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:S28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wuliya M, Sleilaty G, Centa ID, Khelil N, Berrebi A, Czitrom D, et al. An expansible aortic ring to preserve aortic root dynamics after aortic valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:482–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Tohru Sakuragi M.D. and Megumi Hara, M.D. for their invaluable help with the statistics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kojiro Furukawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furukawa, K., Kamohara, K., Yunoki, J. et al. Should the annulus be fixed in aortic valve-sparing root replacement with remodeling?. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 65, 200–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-017-0751-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-017-0751-7

Keywords

Navigation