Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 744–766 | Cite as

Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities

  • S. Arunachalam
  • Sridhar N. Ramaswami
  • Pol Herrmann
  • Doug Walker
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

Drawing from the marketing capabilities and innovation literatures, we identify aprocess by which a firm’s entrepreneurial orientation impacts profits and show that it is dependent on marketing capabilities. Using a half-longitudinal design we integrate survey data with performance metrics over two time periods, from a sample of 190 firms. While the effect of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) on innovation is enhanced by architectural marketing capabilities, the effect of innovation outcomes on profits is enhanced by specialized marketing capabilities. Ultimately, the pathway from EO to performance, mediated by innovation, is positively significant at higher levels of both marketing capabilities. The results uncovered using Bayesian conditional process modeling, are robust to alternate model specifications, endogeneity tests, and provide insights into the capabilities-based understanding of entrepreneurism-marketing interface. We discuss resource allocation implications for managers as they attempt to maximize profits through innovation.

Keywords

Marketing capabilities Innovation Pathway to profitability Moderated mediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate constructive comments from Professors Kersi Antia, Hari Sridhar, and Stephen Kim, and research assistance from Pallavi Jha. The authors also thank comments from doctoral students David Correll, Linlin Chai, and Inmyung Choi. Finally, the authors thank Shanti and Jackie for copy editing a previous version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability - rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61–83.Google Scholar
  4. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepeneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources & sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. The CMO Survey. (2013). In Search of Marketing Excellence: Ten Differences Between High Performing and Low Performing Companies. Retrieved June 15, 2016 from https://cmosurvey.org/2013/01/in-search-of-marketing-excellence-ten-differences-between-high-performing-and-low-performing-companies/
  10. Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(2), 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Comstock, B., Gulati, R., & Liguori, S. (2010). Unleashing the power of marketing. Harvard Business Review, 88(10), 90–98.Google Scholar
  12. Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: a multiple measures-based study. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cui, A. S., & O'Connor, G. (2012). Alliance portfolio resource diversity and firm innovation. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 516–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovations: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–591.Google Scholar
  18. Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dotzel, T., Shankar, V., & Berry, L. L. (2013). Service innovativeness and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science, 18(4), 547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576.Google Scholar
  23. Fang, E., Palmatier, R. W., & Grewal, R. (2011). Effects of customer and innovation asset configuration strategies on firm performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 587–602.Google Scholar
  24. Fang, E. E., Lee, J., Palmatier, R., & Han, S. (2016). If it takes a village to foster innovation, success depends on the neighbors: the effects of global and ego networks on new product launches. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feng, H., Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2017). Firm capabilities and growth: the moderating role of market conditions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foxall, G. (1984). Marketing's domain. European Journal of Marketing, 18(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garen, J. (1984). The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica, 52(5), 1199–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The chief marketing officer matters! Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grewal, R., Chandrashekaran, M., Johnson, J. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2013). Environments, unobserved heterogeneity, and the effect of market orientation on outcomes for high-tech firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 206–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30–45.Google Scholar
  32. Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayes, A. F. (2016). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated-mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Manuscript in review. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/public/pmm2016.
  34. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 627–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.Google Scholar
  37. Joshi, M. P., Das, S. R., & Mouri, N. (2015). Antecedents of Innovativeness in Technology-Based Services: Peering into the Black Box of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Decision Sciences, 46(2), 367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.Google Scholar
  39. Knight, G. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kozlenkova, I. V., Samaha, S. A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014). Resource-based theory in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kushwaha, T., & Shankar, V. (2013). Are multichannel customers really more valuable? The moderating role of product category characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment & industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marinova, D. (2004). Actualizing innovation effort: the impact of market knowledge diffusion in a dynamic system of competition. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 1–20.Google Scholar
  46. Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J. T., & Özsomer, A. (2002). The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2003). Trading off between value creation and value appropriation: The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morgan, N. A. (2012). Marketing and business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 102–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User's Guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  53. O'Dwyer, M., Gilmore, A., & Carson, D. (2009). Innovative marketing in SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1/2), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Patel, P. C., Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation-as-experimentation and firm performance: The enabling role of absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1739–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Payne, M.. (2015). Why big companies need to become more entrepreneurial to survive? Retrieved June 15, 2016 from https://www.cio.com/article/3015451/leadership-management/why-big-companies-need-to-become-more-entrepreneurial-to-survive.html
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Priem, R. L., Butler, J. E., & Li, S. (2013). Toward reimagining strategy research: retrospection & prospection on the 2011 AMR decade award. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ramachandran, K., & Ramnarayan, S. (1993). Entrepreneurial orientation and networking: some indian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(6), 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramaswami, S. N., & Arunachalam, S. (2016). Divided attitudinal loyalty and customer value: role of dealers in an indirect channel. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(6), 770–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma, N. (2014). Innovators versus non-innovators among SMEs in India. World SME News – WASME, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  65. Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: japan and the united states. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sorescu, A. B., & Spanjol, J. (2008). Innovation's effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 114–132.Google Scholar
  68. Sorescu, A. B., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2003). Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 82–102.Google Scholar
  69. Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2011). When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 797–810.Google Scholar
  70. Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1999). Marketing, business processes, and shareholder value: An organizationally embedded view of marketing activities and the discipline of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63(special issue), 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L. D., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2008). Exploring an inverted u-shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in chinese ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  74. Venkataramany, S., & Fox, D. (2009). Globalization of entrepreneurship: overwhelming institutional response in favor of SMEs in India. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 8(3), 131–140.Google Scholar
  75. Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. (2009). Understanding the marketing department's influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vorhies, D. W., Morgan, R. E., & Autry, C. W. (2009). Product-market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1310–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., Parida, V., & Kreiser, P. M. (2013). Nonlinear effects of entrepreneurial orientation on small firm performance: the moderating role of resource orchestration capabilities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(2), 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., Parida, V., & Kreiser, P. M. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, L., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis using Bayesian methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Webb, J. W., Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Kistruck, G. M., & Tihanyi, L. (2011). Where is the opportunity without the customer? An integration of marketing activities, the entrepreneurship process, and institutional theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4), 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weerawardena, J. (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(1), 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2018
corrected publication February/2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Arunachalam
    • 1
  • Sridhar N. Ramaswami
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pol Herrmann
    • 2
    • 4
  • Doug Walker
    • 5
  1. 1.Indian School of BusinessHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Ivy College of Business, Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Indian School of BusinessHyderabadIndia
  4. 4.Tecnológico de MonterreyEGADE Business SchoolSan Pedro Garza GarcíaMexico
  5. 5.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations