Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 252–272 | Cite as

Understanding the long-term implications of retailer returns in business-to-business relationships

  • Lauren Skinner Beitelspacher
  • Thomas L. Baker
  • Adam Rapp
  • Dhruv Grewal
Original Empirical Research

Abstract

Providing end consumers with the ability to return products is an important part of a retailer’s service offering. While research in reverse logistics has explored the movement of returned merchandise upstream, little research examines the relational implications of returned merchandise in the business-to-business (B2B) context. This research explores the relational implications, as well as the impact on the supplier salesperson’s behaviors, of retailer returns. Using a comprehensive dataset which includes longitudinal archival returns data, as well as two waves of retailer surveys reporting on salesperson behaviors, our research investigates how retail returns impact salesperson responses in the following time period, retailer perceptions of the relationship in the following time period, and returns in the following time period. Consistent with a reciprocal exchange perspective, results suggest that when salespeople respond to returns by engaging in relationship building behaviors, these behaviors are noted by the retailer, which in turn results in fewer returns in a future time period.

Keywords

B2B relationships Sales Retail Returns Relationship marketing Social exchange Learning and performance orientations 

References

*Denotes references only appearing in Table 1

  1. Aggarwal, P., & Zhang, M. (2006). The moderating effect of relationship norm salience on consumers’ loss aversion. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., Mathieu, J. E., & Bolander, W. (2010). Why are some salespeople better at adapting to organizational change. Journal of Marketing, 74(3), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. *Ahsan, K., & Rahman, S. (2016). An investigation into critical service determinants of customer to business (C2B) type product returns in retail firms. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 46, 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. *Alptekinoğlu, A., & Grasas, A. (2014). When to carry eccentric products? Optimal retail assortment under consumer returns. Production and Operations Management, 23(5), 877–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1984). A model of the Distributor’s perspective of distributor-manufacturer working relationships. Journal of Marketing, 48(4), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anthony, C. I., & Cowley, E. (2012). The labor of lies: how lying for material rewards polarizes consumers’ outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arya, A., & Mittendorf, B. (2004). "Using return policies to elicit retailer information." RAND Journal of Economics, 35(3), 617–630.Google Scholar
  9. Arya, A., & Mittendorf, B. (2013). The changing face of distribution channels: partial forward integration and strategic investments. Production and Operations Management, 22(5), 1077–1088.Google Scholar
  10. Ballinger, G. A., & Rockmann, K. W. (2010). Chutes versus ladders: anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bechwati, N. N., & Siegal, W. S. (2005). The impact of Prechoice process on product returns. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bercovitz, J., Jap, S. D., & Nickerson, J. A. (2006). The Antecedents and performance implications of cooperative exchange norms. Organization Science, 17(6), 724–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. *Bernon, M., Upperton, J., Bastl, M., & Cullen, J. (2013). An exploration of supply chain integration in the retail product returns process. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 43(7), 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. *Bernon, M. J., Cullen, J., & Gorst, J. (2016). Online retail returns management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 46(6/7), 584–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: the perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 400–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bower, A. B., Maxham, J. G., & III. (2012). Return shipping policies of online retailers: normative assumptions and the long-term consequences of fee and free returns. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, Antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chai, J., Zhao, G., & Babin, B. (2012). An empirical study on the impact of two types of goal orientation and salesperson perceived obsolescence on adaptive selling. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 32(2), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chakrabarty, S., Brown, G., & Widing II, R. E. (2013). Distinguishing between the roles of customer-oriented selling and adaptive selling in managing dysfunctional conflict in buyer–Seller relationships. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 33, 245–260 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Daugherty, P. J., Autry, C. W., & Ellinger, A. E. (2001). Reverse logistics: the relationship between resource commitment and program performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dwyer, R. F., Schurr, P. H., & Sejo, O. (1987). Developing buyer-Seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Oxford: Charles C Thomas Publsiher.Google Scholar
  29. Franke, G. R., & Park, J.-E. (2006). Salesperson adaptive selling behavior and customer orientation: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1999). A meta-analysis of satisfaction in Marketing Channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenberg, M. S. (1980). A theory of indebtedness. In Social exchange: advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. *Gurnani, H., Sharma, A., & Grewal, D. (2010). Optimal returns policy under demand uncertainty. Journal of Retailing, 86(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Handfield, R. B., & Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harmeling, C. M., Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., Arnold, M. J., & Samaha, S. A. (2015). Transformational relationship events. Journal of Marketing, 79, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. *Harris, L. C. (2008). Fraudulent return proclivity: an empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, E. G., Mowen, J. C., & Brown, T. J. (2005). Re-examining salesperson goal orientations; personal influencers, customer orientation, and work satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heide, J. B. (1994). Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Yi, L. (2008). The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees’ commitment to a change: a multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Horvath, P. A., Autry, C. W., & Wilcox, W. E. (2005). Liquidity implications of reverse logistics for retailers: a Markov chain approach. Journal of Retailing, 81(3), 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hughes, D. W., & Ahearne, M. (2010). Energizing the Reseller’s sales force: the power of brand identification. Journal of Marketing, 74, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hughes, D. E., Le Bon, J., & Rapp, A. (2013). Gaining and leveraging customer-based competitive intelligence: the pivotal role of social capital and salesperson adaptive selling skills. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Innis, D. E., & La Londe, B. J. (1994). Customer service: the key to customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and market share. Journal of Business Logistics, 15(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  43. Isern, J., & Pung, C. (2007). Harnessing energy to drive organizational change. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 16–19.Google Scholar
  44. *Iyer, G., & Miguel Villas-Boas, J. (2003). A bargaining theory of distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. *Janakiraman, N., Syrdal, H. A., & Freling, R. (2016). The effect of return policy leniency on consumer purchase and return decisions: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Retailing, 92(2), 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaramillo, F., Ladik, D. M., Marshall, G. W., & Mulki, J. P. (2007). A meta-analysis of the relationship between sales orientation-customer orientation (SOCO) and salesperson job performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 22(4/5), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jasmand, C., Blazevic, V., & de Ruyter, K. (2012). Generating sales while providing service: a study of customer service representatives’ ambidextrous behavior. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones, E., Dixon, A. L., Chonko, L. B., & Cannon, J. P. (2005). Key accounts and team selling: a review, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25(2), 182–198.Google Scholar
  49. *Kandel, E. (1996). The right to return. Journal of Law and Economics, 39(1), 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kidwell, B., Hardesty, D. M., Murtha, B. R., & Sheng, S. (2011). Emotional intelligence in marketing exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim, J., & Wansink, B. (2012). How Retailers’ recommendation and return policies Alter product evaluations. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 528–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. *Kim, S. K., McFarland, R. G., Kwon, S., Son, S., & Griffith, D. A. (2011). Understanding governance decisions in a partially Integrated Channel: a contingent alignment framework. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(June), 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. King, T., Dennis, C., & Wright, L. T. (2008). Myopia, customer returns and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1/2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kohli, A. K., & Zaltman, G. (1988). Measuring multiple buying influences. Industrial Marketing Management, 17(3), 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kohli, A. K., Shervani, T. A., & Challagalla, G. N. (1998). Learning and performance orientation of salespeople: the role of supervisors. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. *Krishnan, H., Kapuscinski, R., & Butz, D. (2004). Coordinating contracts for decentralized supply chains with retailer promotional effort. Management Science, 50(1), 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kumar, K., & van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in Interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lam, S. K., Kraus, F., & Ahearne, M. (2010). The diffusion of market orientation throughout the organization: a social learning theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74(3), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. O. (2000). Interimistic relational exchange: conceptualization and propositional development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lambe, C. J., Wittmann, M. C., & Spekman, R. E. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business-to-business relational exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(3), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McFarland, R. G., Challagalla, G. N., & Shervani, T. A. (2006). Influence tactics for effective adaptive selling. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 121–144.Google Scholar
  64. *Minnema, A., Bijmolt, T., Gensler, S., & Wiesel, T. (2016). To keep or not to keep: effects of online customer reviews on product returns. Journal of Retailing, 92(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moberg, C. R., & Speh, T. (2003). Evaluating the relationship between questionable business practices and the strength of supply chain relationships. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Molm, L. D., Quist, T. M., & Wiseley, P. A. (1994). Imbalanced structures, unfair strategies: power and justice in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (2003). In the eye of the beholder: procedural justice in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. National Retail Federation (2015). Consumer Returns in the Retail Industry. www.nrf.com.
  71. *O’Brien, M. O., Hill, D. J., & Autry, C. W. (2009). Customer behavioral legitimacy in retail returns episodes: effects on retail salesperson role conflict. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. *Padmanabhan, V., & Png, I. P. L. (1997). Manufacturer’s return policies and retail competition. Marketing Science, 16(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Palmatier, R. W. (2008). Relationship marketing. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  74. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the Effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., & Grewal, D. (2007). A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of Interorganizational relationship performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. *Pasternack, B. A. (1985). Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Science, 4(2), 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, M. J. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation Nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pelser, J., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., Grewal, D., Cox, D., & van Beuningen, J. (2015). B2B channel partner programs: disentangling indebtedness from gratitude. Journal of Retailing, 91(4), 660–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Perrault, W., & Russ, F. (1976). Physical distribution Service in Industrial Purchase Decisions. Journal of Marketing, 40, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Petersen, A. J., & Kumar, V. (2009). Are product returns a necessary evil? Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Piron, F., & Young, M. (2000). Retail borrowing: insights and implications on returning used merchandise. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 28(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. *Powers, T. L., & Jack, E. P. (2013). The influence of cognitive dissonance on retail product returns. Psychology and Marketing, 30(8), 724–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Forbes, L. P. (2008). The sales force technology-performance chain: the role of adaptive selling and effort. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 28(4), 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Baker, T. L. (2011). Conceptualizing salesperson competitive intelligence: an Individual-Level Perspective. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L., Grewal, D., & Hughes, D. (2013). Understanding social media effects across Seller, retailer, and consumer interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2d ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Richey, R. G., Genchev, S. E., & Daugherty, P. J. (2005). The role of resource commitment and innovation in reverse logistics performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35(4), 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Romàn, S., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of adaptive selling confidence and behavior: a dyadic analysis of salespeople and their customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Spiro, R. L., & Weitz, B. A. (1990). Adaptive selling: conceptualization, measurement, and Nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Strebel, P. (1996). Why do employees resist change? Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 11–20.Google Scholar
  91. Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Kumar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
  94. Tsay, A. (2001). Managing Retail Channel overstock: markdown money and return policies. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 457–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. *Tsay, A. (2002). Risk sensitivity in distribution channel partnerships: implications for manufacturer return policies. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wan, L. C., Hui, M. K., Wyer, R. S., & Jr. (2011). The role of relationship norms in responses to service failures. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 260–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. *Wang, H. (2004). Do return policies intensify retail competition? Marketing Science, 23(4), 611–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. *Wang, X. (2009). Retail return policy, endowment effect, and consumption propensity: an experimental study. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. *Wang, H., Wang, W., & Kobaccy, K. A. H. (2007). Analysis and Design of Returns Policies from a Supplier’s perspective. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(3), 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wang, S., Beatty, S. E., & Liu, J. (2012). Employees’ decision making in the face of customers’ fuzzy return requests. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Weitz, B. A., Sujan, H., & Sujan, M. (1986). Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior: a framework for improving selling Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Weitz, B. A., Castleberry, S. B., Tanner, J. F., & Jr. (2009). Selling: building partnerships (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  105. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  106. Yi, H.-t., Dubinsky, A. J., & Lim, C. U. (2013). Manufacturer support for a partially Integrated Channel in South Korea: power-dependence vs. marketing Effectiveness perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 30(2), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yue, X., & Raghunathan, S. (2007). The impacts of the full returns policy on a supply chain with information asymmetry. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 630–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Skinner Beitelspacher
    • 1
  • Thomas L. Baker
    • 2
  • Adam Rapp
    • 3
  • Dhruv Grewal
    • 1
  1. 1.Malloy HallBabson CollegeBabson ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  3. 3.Ohio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations