Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K., Langer, T., Ma, Y., & Neslin, S. A. (2014). Consumer response to uncertain promotions: an empirical analysis of conditional rebates. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(1), 94–106.
Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). When does duration matter in judgment and decision making? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129, 508–529.
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 234–248.
Blattberg, R. C., Kim, B.-D., & Neslin, S. A. (2008). Database marketing: analyzing and managing customers. New York: Springer.
Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2013). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 1–19, doi: 10.3758/s13428–013–0365–7
Cryder, C.E., Mullen, E.E., & Loewenstein, G. (2008, November). Wanting versus choosing: A disconnect between what moves us and what we prefer. Paper presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making Preconference: Using Human Nature to Improve Human Life, Chicago, IL.
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics, revised and updated edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F., Dunford, R., Hudson, S., Wilson, K., & Boyle, K. (1993). Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: tests of validity and reliability. In J. Hausman (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 91–159). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dhar, S. K., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., & Soman, D. (1999). Modeling the effects of advertised price claims: tensile versus precise claims? Marketing Science, 18(2), 154–177.
Erev, I., & Rapoport, A. (1998). Coordination, “magic”, and reinforcement learning in a market entry game. Games and economic behavior, 23(2), 146–175.
Feinman, J. P., Blashek, R. D., & McCabe, R. J. (1986). Sweepstakes, prize promotions, games and contests. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fetherstonhaugh, D., Slovic, P., Johnson, S., & Friedrich, J. (1997). Insensitivity to the value of human life: a study of psychophysical numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 283–300.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45–55.
Goldsmith, K., & Amir, O. (2010). Can uncertainty improve promotion? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1070–1077.
Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., & Moran, E. (2001). The evaluability hypothesis revisited: joint and separate evaluation preference reversal as a function of attribute importance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 216–233.
Hönekopp, J. (2003). Precision of probability information and prominence of outcomes: a description and evaluation of decision under uncertainty. Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Processes, 90, 124–138.
Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: an explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 247–257.
Hsee, C. K. (1998). Less is better: when low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 107–121.
Hsee, C. K. (2000). Attribute evaluability: its implications for joint-separate evaluation reversals and beyond. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 543–565). New York: Russell Sage.
Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 680–695.
Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). General evaluability theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 343–355.
Hsee, C. K., Blount, S., Loewenstein, G., & Bazerman, M. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: a review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 576–590.
Hsee, C. K., Rottenstreich, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2005). When is more better? on the relationship between magnitude and subjective value. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 234–237.
Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Li, N., & Shen, L. (2009). Wealth, warmth, and well-being: whether happiness is relative or absolute depends on whether it is about money, acquisition, or consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 396–409.
Jiang, Y., Cho, A., & Adaval, T. (2009). The unique consequences of feeling lucky: implications for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 171–184.
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405.
Kalra, A., & Shi, M. (2010). Consumer value-maximizing sweepstakes and contests. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 287–300.
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 106–116.
List, J. (2002). Preference reversals of a different kind: the “more is less” phenomenon. American Economic Review, 92, 1636–1643.
Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 560–572.
Madzharov, A. V., & Block, L. (2010). Effects of product unit image on consumption of snack foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 398–409.
Mogelefsky, D. (2000). Million dollar madness. Incentive, 174(2), 18–25.
Morewedge, C. K., Kassam, K. S., Hsee, C. K., & Caruso, E. M. (2009). Duration sensitivity depends on stimulus familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138, 177–186.
Odell, P. (2009). Spending up by a nose. (accessed September 13, 2011) [available at http://promomagazine.com/contests/marketing_spending_nose/].
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. (1994). Consumer knowledge assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 71–82.
Pezdek, K. (1977). Cross-modality semantic integration of sentence and picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3(5), 515.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
Rapoport, A., Seale, D. A., Erev, I., & Sundali, J. A. (1998). Equilibrium play in large group market entry games. Management Science, 44(1), 119–141.
Rottenstreich, Y., & Kivetz, R. (2006). Decision making without likelihood judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 74–88.
Sasson, R. Y. (1971). Interfering images at sentence retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 56.
Shapira, Z., & Venezia, I. (1992). Size and frequency of prizes as determinants of the demand for lotteries. Organizational Behavior and Decision Making Processes, 52, 307–318.
Path to Purchase Institute and Shopper Marketing (2013). Type of digital marketing content used for digital shopper marketing programs according to US CPG executives, march 2013 (% of respondants) [chart], Digital Shopper Marketers Survey 2013. As cited by emarketer. Retrieved March 14th 2014.
Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & McClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277–288.
Sundali, J. A., Rapoport, A., & Seale, D. A. (1995). Coordination in market entry games with symmetric players. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), 203–218.
Teichmann, M. H., Gedenk, K., & Knaf, M. (2005). Consumers’ preferences for online vs. offline sweepstakes and contests: the impact of promotion attributes on consumers’ entry decisions. Marketing Journal of Research and Management, 1, 76–90.
Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2014). The “visual preference heuristic”: the influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 993–1015.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Ward, J. C., & Hill, R. P. (1991). Designing effective promotional games: opportunities and problems. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 69–81.
Wildfire (2012a). Facebook users’ rate of sharing facebook marketing campaigns worldwide, by type, April 2012 [Chart]. Earned Media Study. As cited by emarketer. Retrieved March 27th 2014.
Wildfire (2012b). Earned Media Click Rate for Facebook Marketing Campaigns Worldwide, by Type, April 2012 [Chart]. Earned Media Study. As cited by emarketer. Retrieved March 27th 2014.
Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., Byram, S., Fischoff, B., & Welsch, G. (2000). A new scale for assessing perceptions of chance. Medical Decision Making, 20(3), 298–307.
Yan, D., & Muthukrishnan, A. V. (2014). Killing hope with good intentions: the effects of consolation prizes on preference for lottery promotions. Journal of Marketing Research: In-Press.
Yeung, C. W. M., & Soman, D. (2005). Attribute evaluability and the range effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 363–369.
Yeung, C. W. M., & Soman, D. (2007). The duration heuristic. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 315–326.
Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2004). “Is 28% good or bad?” evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions. Medical Decision Making, 24, 142–148.