Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 456–470 | Cite as

Brand related information as context: the impact of brand name characteristics on memory and choice

Original Empirical Research

Abstract

Consumer exposure to new brand names can occur in contexts with or without brand information being present. Whereas previous research has examined the effects of brand name characteristics (association set size and word frequency) on memory in the presence of brand information, this paper also assesses brand name effects in contexts without brand related information and extends it to brand consideration and choice. Two different processes are found to be operating as consumers retrieve brands and make a choice. Recall seems to benefit from a distinctiveness based route, which also guides consideration and choice. In contrast, implicit memory is influenced by familiarity, with corresponding consideration and choice effects. The implications are that firms’ choice of brand names and media needs to consider the combination of brand name characteristics that will lead to desired outcomes vis-à-vis distinctiveness or familiarity based processes.

Keywords

Brand names Memory and recall Implicit memory Brand associations Brand consideration Brand choice 

References

  1. Alba, J. W., Hutchinson, J. W., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1991). Memory and decision making. In T. S. Robertson & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 1–49). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Allenby, G. M., & Ginter, J. L. (1995). The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogart, L., & Tolley, B. S. (1988). The search for information in newspaper advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, (April/May): 9–19.Google Scholar
  4. Boush, D. M., & Kahle, L. (2001). Evaluating negative information in online consumer discussions: from qualitative analysis to signal detection. Journal of Euro-Marketing, 11(2), 89–105.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakravarti, A., & Janiszewski, C. (2003). The influence of macro-level motives on consideration set composition in novel purchase situations. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 244–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coates, J. F. (2004). Keeping up with the future II. Research Technology Management, 47(2), 7–8.Google Scholar
  8. Del Rio, B., Vazquez, R., & Iglesias, V. (2001). The role of the brand name in obtaining differential advantages. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(7), 452–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Desai, K. K., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). Descriptive characteristics of memory-based consideration sets: influence of usage occasion frequency and usage location familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duke, C. R., & Carlson, L. (1993). A conceptual approach to alternative memory measures for advertising effectiveness. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferraro, R., Bettman, J. R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2009). The power of strangers: the effect of incidental consumer brand encounters on brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Selective effects of interference on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregg, V. H. (1976). Word frequency, recognition, and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 183–216). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Grimes, A. (2008). Towards an integrated model of low attention advertising effects: a perceptual-conceptual framework. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heilman, C. M., Bowman, D., & Wright, G. P. (2000). The evolution of brand preferences and choice behaviors of consumers new to a market. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holden, S. J. S., & Vanhuele, M. (1999). Know the name, forget the exposure: brand familiarity versus memory of exposure context. Psychology and Marketing, 16(6), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiecker, P., & Cowles, D. (2001). Interpersonal communication and personal influence on the internet: a framework for examining online word-of-mouth. Journal of Euromarketing, 11(2), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirmani, A., & Zhu, R. (2007). Vigilant against manipulation: the effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klink, R. R. (2001). Creating meaningful new brand names: a study of semantics and sound symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2), 27–34.Google Scholar
  23. Klink, R. R. (2003). Creating meaningful brands: the relationship between brand name and brand mark. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klink, R. R., & Smith, D. C. (2001). Threats to the external validity of brand extension research. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohli, C., & Hemnes, T. M. (1995). A corporation by any other name....? Business Horizons, 38(6), 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krishnan, H. S., & Chakravarti, D. (1993). Varieties of brand memory induced by advertising: Determinants, measures, and relationships. In D. Aaker & A. Biel (Eds.), Brand equity and advertising: Advertising’s role in building strong brands (pp. 213–231). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Krishnan, H. S., & Shapiro, S. (1996). Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krishnan, H. S., & Chakravarti, D. (1999). Memory measures for pretesting advertisements: an integrative conceptual framework and a diagnostic template. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishnan, H. S., & Trappey, C. V. (1999). Nonconscious memory processes in marketing: a historical perspective and future directions. Psychology and Marketing, 16(6), 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, A. Y. (2002). Effects of implicit memory on memory-based versus stimulus-based brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(4), 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, Y. H., & Ang, K. S. (2003). Brand name suggestiveness: a chinese language perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(4), 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lurie, N. H., & Mason, C. H. (2007). Visual representation: implications for decision making. Journal of Marketing, 71, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lustig, C., & Hasher, L. (2001). Implicit memory is not immune to interference. Psychological Bulletin, 127(5), 618–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lutz, K. A., & Lutz, R. J. (1977). Effects of interactive imagery on learning: application to advertising. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynch, J. G., Marmorstein, H., & Weigold, M. F. (1988). Choices from sets including remembered brands: use of recalled attributes and prior overall evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McKechnie, S. A., & Zhou, J. (2003). Product placement in movies: a comparison of chinese and american consumers’ attitudes. International Journal of Advertising, 22(3), 349–374.Google Scholar
  38. Meyers-Levy, J. (1989). The influence of a brand name’s association set size and word frequency on brand memory. Journal of Consumer Research, Sept: 197–207.Google Scholar
  39. Myers, C. A. (2003). Managing brand equity: a look at the impact of attributes. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelson, D. L., & Xu, J. (1995). Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word frequency effects. Psychological Research, 57, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orth, U. R., & Marchi, R. D. (2007). Understanding the relationships between functional, symbolic, and experiential brand beliefs, product experiential attributes, and product schema: advertising-trial interactions revisited. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(3), 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. D., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 names. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Monograph Supplement. 76, 3.Google Scholar
  44. Pavia, T., & Costa, J. A. (1993). The winning number: consumer perceptions of alpha-numeric brand names. Journal of Marketing, 57, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2004). Neighborhood density, word frequency, and spelling sound regularity effects in naming: similarities and differences between skilled readers and the dual route cascaded computational model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 13–31.Google Scholar
  46. Roehm, M. M., Roehm, H. A., Jr., & Boone, D. S. (2004). Plugs versus placements: a comparison of alternatives for within-program brand exposure. Psychology and Marketing, 21(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: history and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shapiro, S., & Krishnan, H. S. (2001). Memory-based measures for assessing advertising effects: a comparison of explicit and implicit memory effects. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  49. Shapiro, S., MacInnis, D. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1997). The effects of incidental ad exposure on the formation of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sinn, F., Milberg, S. J., Epstein, L. D., & Goodstein, R. C. (2007). Compromising the compromise effect: brands matter. Marketing Letters, 18, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Vanden, B., Alder, G. B. K., & Oliver, L. (1987). Linguistic distinction among top brand names. Journal of Advertising Research, 27(4), 39–44.Google Scholar
  53. Ward, J. C., & Ostrom, A. L. (2003). The internet as information minefield: an analysis of the source and content of brand information yielded by net searches. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 907–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2007). The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies: levels of placement, explicit and implicit memory, and brand-choice behavior. Journal of Communication, 57, 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zinkhan, G. M., & Martin, C. R. (1987). New brand names and inferential beliefs: some insights on naming new products. Journal of Business Research, 15(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian School of BusinessHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Marketing Department, Kelley School of BusinessIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations