Skip to main content
Log in

A design approach for the development of flexible production machines

Focus on improving the changeover process of format-flexible packaging machines

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rising demand for individualised products is one of the most important trends in today’s market. This is having a big impact on the manufacturing industry since it means that the flexibility of production machines must be increased. Packaging machines are greatly affected by the rising demand for format-flexibility because of decreasing batch sizes, the high number of format changes and the resulting lack of productivity. In the past, packaging machines as well as other production machines were developed with a focus on large-scale production. Hence, offering format-flexible packaging machines is a new challenge for manufacturers. Improvements in format-flexibility have to take place within the development process of the manufacture of packaging machines. This paper presents an overall concept which integrates four design modules into a generalised development process. These four design modules support developers in creating a solution regarding format flexibility which is, from a technical and economic point of view optimised for the demands of the users of packaging machines. The approach is focused on the special requirements of packaging machines, but it can be adapted for other types of production machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neugebauer R (2012) Werkzeugmaschinen. Springer Vieweg, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudolf H (2006) Wissensbasierte Montageplanung in der Digitalen Fabrik am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie. Herbert Utz, München

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jäger S (2004) Absatzsysteme für Mass Customization. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Roland Berger (2012) Mastering product complexity 2012. http://www.rolandberger.us/media/pdf/Roland_Berger_Mastering-Product-Complexity_20121107

  5. Jonas K (2005) Packaging Machinery and Equipment. U.S. Commercial Service Germany

  6. Dumoulin E (2012) Changes and perspectives in food studies. Int J Food Stud IJFS 1:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Römisch P, Weiß M (2014) Projektierungspraxis Verarbeitungsanlagen. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Sethi A, Sethi S (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 2:289–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiendahl H-P, ElMaraghy HA, Nyhuis P, Zäh MF, Wiendahl H–H, Duffie N, Brieke M (2007) Changeable manufacturing—classification, design and operation. Ann CIRP 56/2:783–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abele E, Liebeck T, Wörn A (2006) measuring flexibility in investment decisions for manufacturing systems. Ann CIRP 55/1:433–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Slack N (1983) Flexibility as a manufacturing objective. Int J Operat Prod Manag 3:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zäh M, Möller N, Vogl W (2005) Symbiosis of Changeable and Virtual Production. CARV 05 International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production, pp. 3–10

  13. Wiendahl H-P (2009) Veränderungsfähigkeit von Produktionsunternehmen - Ein morphologischer Ansatz. ZWF 104:32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bleisch G, Langowski H-C, Majschak J-P (2014) Lexikon Verpackungstechnik. B. Behr’s, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shingo S (1985) A Revolution in manufacturing: the SMED system. Productivity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. McIntosh R, Culley S, Mileham A, Owen G (2001) Improving Changeover Performance. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sekine K, Arai K (1992) Kaizen for quick changeover—going beyond SMED. Productivity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mileham A, Culley S, Owen G, McIntosh R (1999) Rapid changeover—pre-requisite for responsive manufacture. Int J Operations Prod Manag 19:785–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Gouberger D, van Landeghem H (2002) Rules for integrating fast changeover capabilities into new equipment design. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf 18:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reik M, McIntosh R, Culley S, Mileham A, Owen G (2006) A formal design for changeover methodology. Part 1: theory and background. J Eng Manuf 220:1225–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reik M, McIntosh R, Culley S, Mileham A, Owen G (2006) A formal design for changeover methodology. Part 2: methodology and case study. J Eng Manuf 220:1237–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Owen G, Matthews J, McIntosh R, Culley S (2011) Design for changeover (DFC): enabling flexible and highly responsive manufacturing. In: Fogliatto F, da Silveira G (2011) Mass customization. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. VDI-Gesellschaft (1993) VDI 2221: Systematic approach to the development and design of technical systems and products. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. VDI-Gesellschaft (2004) VDI 2206: Design methodology for mechatronic systems. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  25. Götz G, Rohrhirsch M, Gebbe C, Richter C, Reinhart G (2017) Economical comparison of packaging machines: a new approach based on an economic evaluation model. Appl Mech Mater 856:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gausemeier J, Fink A, Schlake O (1998) Scenario management. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 59:111–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gausemeier J, Plass C (2014) Zukunftsorientierte Unternehmensgestaltung. Carl Hanser, München, p 48

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Schack R (2008) Methodik zur bewertungsorientierten Skalierung der Digitalen Fabrik. Utz, München, p 126

    Google Scholar 

  29. Götze M (2008) Investitionsrechnung. Springer, Berlin, p 375

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Klemke T (2014) Planung der systemischen Wandlungsfähigkeit von Fabriken. TEWISS, Garbsen, p 67

    Google Scholar 

  31. Götz G, Stich P, Backhaus J, Reinhart G (2016) Design Approach for the Development of Format-Flexible Packaging Machines. International Conference on Mechatronics and Computational Mechanics 2016, Singapore

  32. Schuh G, Klappert S (2011) Technologiemanagement. Springer, Berlin, p 230

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Götz G, Fink J, Richter C, Reinhart G (2016) Increasing the format-flexibility of packaging machines: experimental study on laser beam sealing and cutting. Appl Mech Mater 856:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Götz G, Stich P, Thunig S, Glasschröder J, Reinhart G (2015) Improving resource and energy efficiency of packaging machines: contribution of an increasing format flexibility. Appl Mech Mater 805:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology for the funding of the project Green Factory Bavaria within the program “Zukunftsinitiative Aufbruch Bayern”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Kiefer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Götz, G., Kiefer, L., Richter, C. et al. A design approach for the development of flexible production machines. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 12, 331–340 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0804-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0804-5

Keywords

Navigation