Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal: comment

Internal and Emergency Medicine (2021)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    Corazza GR, Lenti MV, Howdle PD (2020) Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal. Intern Emerg Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02580-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, Charlin B (2011) An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory. Med Educ Online. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.5890

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Klein G (2008) Naturalistic decision-making. Hum Fact 50:456–460. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E et al (2015) Insights into emergency physicians’ minds in the seconds before and into a patient encounter. Intern Emerg Med 10:865–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-015-1283-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yao DC, Wright SM (2000) National survey of internal medicine residency program directors regarding problem residents. JAMA 284:1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.9.1099

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Training and Research in Health Sciences Education (CFRPS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    Thierry Pelaccia

  2. Prehospital Emergency Care Service (SAMU 67), Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

    Thierry Pelaccia

Authors
  1. Thierry Pelaccia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Pelaccia.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pelaccia, T. Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal: comment. Intern Emerg Med (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02650-x

Download citation