Internal and Emergency Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 333–341 | Cite as

Mild troponin elevation in patients admitted to the emergency department with atrial fibrillation: 30-day post-discharge prognostic significance

  • João AugustoEmail author
  • Miguel Borges Santos
  • David Roque
  • Daniel Faria
  • Joana Urzal
  • José Morais
  • Victor Gil
  • Carlos Morais


Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often undergo troponin (Tn) testing in the emergency department (ED), but the clinical significance of mildly elevated values remains unclear. We evaluated short-term 30-day post-discharge outcomes in AF patients according to troponin levels. Out of 2181 AF patients evaluated in the ED (June 2014 to June 2015), we included consecutive admitted patients. Patients were grouped into those with normal Tn values (≤ 0.05 ng/mL), mild elevations (> 0.05–0.5 ng/mL, 10× URL) and marked elevations (> 0.5 ng/mL). Outcomes included acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization, all-cause mortality and combined end point; the secondary outcome was ischemic stroke. A total of 348 patients (90.9%) had Tn testing, which was associated with longer in-hospital stay (median 2.04 vs. 0.74 days in unmeasured Tn, p = 0.014); 37.1% did not have clinical suspicion of ACS. Mild Tn elevation occurred in 19.0% and 6.3% had markedly elevated values. Compared to normal values, mild elevations had higher absolute incidence, without statistical significance, of ACS (1.5 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.202), revascularization (1.5 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.202), all-cause mortality (12.1 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.200), combined end point (13.3 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.084) or ischemic stroke (4.5 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.394). Tn testing is routine in admitted AF patients, even without suspicion of ACS, and is associated with prolonged stay. Mild Tn elevation is associated with a nonsignificant trend toward higher adverse events. Larger-scale studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Tn testing for prognosis in admitted AF patients, as this prolongs stay and has unclear impact on patient management.


Troponin I Atrial fibrillation Emergency department Prognosis 



This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived by the institutional ethics committee.


  1. 1.
    Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA et al (1994) The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects. Am J Cardiol 74:236–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marini C, De Santis F, Sacco S et al (2005) Contribution of atrial fibrillation to incidence and outcome of ischemic stroke: results from a population-based study. Stroke 36:1115–1119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McDonald AJ, Pelletier AJ, Ellinor PT et al (2008) Increasing US emergency department visit rates and subsequent hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation from 1993 to 2004. Ann Emerg Med 51:58–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atzema CL, Austin PC, Miller E et al (2013) A population-based description of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department, 2002 to 2010. Ann Emerg Med 62:570–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrett TW, Self WH, Jenkins CA et al (2013) Predictors of regional variations in hospitalizations following emergency department visits for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 112:1410–1416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thygesen K, Alpert J, Jaffe A et al (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33:2551–2567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mehta NJ, Khan IA, Gupta V et al (2004) Cardiac troponin I predicts myocardial dysfunction and adverse outcome in septic shock. Int J Cardiol 95:13–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naidech AM, Kreiter KT, Janjua N et al (2005) Cardiac troponin elevation, cardiovascular morbidity, and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Circulation 112:2851–2856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Latini R, Masson S, Anand IS et al (2007) Prognostic value of very low plasma concentrations of troponin T in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Circulation 116:1242–1249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parwani AS, Boldt LH, Huemer M et al (2013) Atrial fibrillation-induced cardiac troponin I release. Int J Cardiol 168:2734–2737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van den Bos EJ, Constantinescu A, van Domburg RT et al (2011) Minor elevations in troponin I are associated with mortality and adverse cardiac events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 32:611–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conti A, Mariannini Y, Viviani G et al (2013) Abnormal troponin level as short-term predictor of poor outcome in acute atrial fibrillation. Am J Emerg Med 31:699–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hijazi Z, Oldgren J, Andersson U et al (2014) Importance of persistent elevation of cardiac biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY substudy. Heart 100:1193–1200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta K, Pillarisetti J, Biria M et al (2014) Clinical utility and prognostic significance of measuring troponin I levels in patients presenting to the emergency room with atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol 37:343–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP et al (2016) 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent st-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37:267–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daniels LB, Laughlin GA, Clopton P et al (2008) Minimally elevated cardiac troponin T and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide predict mortality in older adults: results from the Rancho Bernardo study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:450–459CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Camm J, Lip G, Caterina R et al (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 33:2719–2747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    January C, Wann L, Alpert J et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:2246–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S et al (2013) ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949–3003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137:263–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ziad H, Johan L, John A et al (2016) The ABC (age, biomarkers, clinical history) stroke risk score: a biomarker-based risk score for predicting stroke in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 37:1582–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIMI 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CardiologyHospital Professor Fernando FonsecaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations