Lactate determination in pleural and abdominal effusions: a quick diagnostic marker of exudate—a pilot study
- 200 Downloads
Pleural or abdominal effusions are frequent findings in ICU and Internal Medicine patients. Diagnostic gold standard to distinguish between transudate and exudate is represented by “Light’s Criteria,” but, unfortunately, the chemical–physical examination for their calculation is not a rapid test. Pursuing an acid–base assessment of the fluid by a blood-gas analyzer, an increase of lactate beyond the normal serum range is reported in the exudative effusions. The advantages of this test are that it is a very fast bed-side test, executable directly by the physician. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the increase in lactate in pleural and abdominal effusions might be used as a criterion for the differential diagnosis of the nature of the fluid. Sixty-nine patients with pleural or abdominal effusions and clinical indication for thoracentesis or paracentesis were enrolled. Acid–base assessment with lactate, total protein, and LDH dosage on the serum, and acid–base assessment with lactate, total protein, and LDH dosage, cytology, and bacterial culture on the fluid were performed to each patient. Fluid–blood lactate difference (ΔLacFB) and fluid–blood lactate ratio (LacFB ratio) were calculated. A statistical analysis was carried out for fluid lactate (LacF), ΔLacFB, and LacFB ratio, performing ROC curves to find the cut-off values with best sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) predicting an exudate diagnosis: LacF: cut-off value: 2.4 mmol/L; AU-ROC 0.854 95% CI 0.756–0.952; Sn 0.77; Sp 0.84. ΔLacFB: cut-off value: 0.95 mmol/L; Au-ROC 0.876 95% CI 0.785–0.966; Sn 0.80; Sp 0.92. LacFB ratio: cut-off value: 2 mmol/L; Au-ROC 0.730 95% CI 0.609–0.851; Sn 0.74; Sp 0.65. Lactate dosage by blood-gas analyzer on pleural and abdominal effusions seems to be a promising tool to predict a diagnosis of exudate.
KeywordsLactate Delta lactate Lactate ratio Pleural effusion Abdominal effusion Light’s criteria Exudate Transudate Diagnostic marker Thoracentesis Paracentesis Infection Sepsis Pneumonia Bacterial peritonitis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 12.Sahn SA (1985) Pathogenesis and clinical features of diseases associated with a low pleural fluid glucose. In: Chretien J, Bignon J, Hirsch A (eds) The pleura in health and disease. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 267–285Google Scholar
- 20.Ortega L, Heredia JL, Armengol R et al (1991) The differential diagnosis between pleural exudates and transudates: the value of cholesterol. Med Clin (Barc) 96:367–370Google Scholar
- 30.Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent J-L, Moreno R (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines committee including the pediatric subgroup: surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 41:N2CrossRefGoogle Scholar